الفرد والمجتمع والدولة
- اللغة:
- الإنجليزية
- الحالة:
- عمل كامل
- التأليف:
- كتبه المؤلف بنفسه
- حالة النص:
- نص سليم
- الحجم:
- ~5,470 كلمة · 26 مقطعًا
استشهد بهذا العمل
- APAإيما غولدمان. (n.d.). الفرد والمجتمع والدولة. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ar/works/emma-goldman/the-individual-society-and-the-state
- MLAإيما غولدمان. "الفرد والمجتمع والدولة." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ar/works/emma-goldman/the-individual-society-and-the-state.
- Chicagoإيما غولدمان. الفرد والمجتمع والدولة. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ar/works/emma-goldman/the-individual-society-and-the-state.
عمّ يتحدث
المقالة المتأخرة التي تلخّص فيها غولدمان فلسفتها السياسية: الفرد مقياساً، والدولة تهديداً، والمجتمع نسيجاً.
السياق والتاريخ
من الثلاثينيات، بعد أن رأت الفاشية والستالينية معاً، ولذلك هي أدقّ تفريقاً من كتاباتها الأولى: التمييز بين المجتمع والدولة هو الذي يحمل الثقل كله. هذه مقالة قصيرة لا كتاب: وحجمها في الفهرس ليس عيباً في النسخة. وقد اتخذ كثير من عمل غولدمان هذه الصورة، في مجلتها «الأرض الأم» وفي الكراسات.
سياق تحريري، لا مصدر قابل للاقتباس: بخلاف مقاطع العمل نفسه، لا يمكن التحقق من هذه المعلومات في المدونة.
The minds of men are in confusion, for the very foundations of our civilization seem to be tottering. People are losing faith in the existing institutions, and the more intelligent realize that capitalist industrialism is defeating the very purpose it is supposed to serve. The world is at a loss for a way out. Parliamentarism and democracy are on the decline. Salvation is being sought in Fascism and other forms of “strong” government. The struggle of opposing ideas now going on in the world involves social problems urgently demanding a solution. The welfare of the individual and the fate of human society depend on the right answer to those questions The crisis, unemployment, war, disarmament, international relations, etc., are among those problems. The State, government with its functions and powers, is now the subject of vital interest to every thinking man. Political developments in all civilized countries have brought the questions home. Shall we have a strong government? Are democracy and parliamentary government to be preferred, or is Fascism of one kind or another, dictatorship - monarchical, bourgeois or proletarian - the solution of the ills and difficulties that beset society today? In other words, shall we cure the evils of democracy by more democracy, or shall we cut the Gordian knot of popular government with the sword of dictatorship? My answer is neither the one nor the other. I am against dictatorship and Fascism as I am opposed to parliamentary regimes and so-called political democracy. Nazism has been justly called an attack on civilization. This characterization applies with equal force to every form of dictatorship; indeed, to every kind of suppression and coercive authority. For what is civilization in the true sense? All progress has been essentially an enlargement of the liberties of the individual with a corresponding decrease of the authority wielded over him by external forces.…
عمّ يتحدث الفرد والمجتمع والدولة؟لخّص الفرد والمجتمع والدولة بإيجازما هي الأفكار الرئيسية في الفرد والمجتمع والدولة؟
→ العودة إلى إيما غولدمان