SigPhiSigPhi

مقالات آرثر شوبنهاور: فن الأدب

آرثر شوبنهاور

اللغة:
الإنجليزية
الحالة:
عمل كامل
التأليف:
كتبه المؤلف بنفسه
حالة النص:
نص سليم
الحجم:
~34,900 كلمة · 166 مقطعًا
استشهد بهذا العمل
  • APAآرثر شوبنهاور. (n.d.). مقالات آرثر شوبنهاور: فن الأدب. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ar/works/schopenhauer/the-essays-of-arthur-schopenhauer-the-art-of-literature
  • MLAآرثر شوبنهاور. "مقالات آرثر شوبنهاور: فن الأدب." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ar/works/schopenhauer/the-essays-of-arthur-schopenhauer-the-art-of-literature.
  • Chicagoآرثر شوبنهاور. مقالات آرثر شوبنهاور: فن الأدب. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ar/works/schopenhauer/the-essays-of-arthur-schopenhauer-the-art-of-literature.

عمّ يتحدث

في الكتابة وفي القراءة: الأسلوب، والمؤلفون، والنقد، ولماذا تضرّ القراءة المفرطة.

السياق والتاريخ

«حين نقرأ، يفكّر شخص آخر بدلاً منّا.» ومقالة الأسلوب ما زالت من أفضل ما كُتب في أي لغة، وحملته على فلاسفة الجامعة ما زالت تلسع. ملاحظة بشأن الطبعة: «Essays of Schopenhauer» ليس كتاباً كتبه شوبنهاور بهذا الاسم. هو مختارات من فصول «باريرغا وباراليبومينا» (1851) صنعها المحرّر الإنجليزي، بعنوان من عنده. النص لشوبنهاور؛ والكتاب ليس كذلك. هذه ترجمة إنجليزية قديمة في الملك العام. والأصل الألماني في الفهرس أيضاً، وهو ما ينبغي الاستشهاد به.

سياق تحريري، لا مصدر قابل للاقتباس: بخلاف مقاطع العمل نفسه، لا يمكن التحقق من هذه المعلومات في المدونة.

كيف يبدأ
There are, first of all, two kinds of authors: those who write for the subject's sake, and those who write for writing's sake. While the one have had thoughts or experiences which seem to them worth communicating, the others want money; and so they write, for money. Their thinking is part of the business of writing. They may be recognized by the way in which they spin out their thoughts to the greatest possible length; then, too, by the very nature of their thoughts, which are only half-true, perverse, forced, vacillating; again, by the aversion they generally show to saying anything straight out, so that they may seem other than they are. Hence their writing is deficient in clearness and definiteness, and it is not long before they betray that their only object in writing at all is to cover paper. This sometimes happens with the best authors; now and then, for example, with Lessing in his _Dramaturgie_, and even in many of Jean Paul's romances. As soon as the reader perceives this, let him throw the book away; for time is precious. The truth is that when an author begins to write for the sake of covering paper, he is cheating the reader; because he writes under the pretext that he has something to say. Writing for money and reservation of copyright are, at bottom, the ruin of literature. No one writes anything that is worth writing, unless he writes entirely for the sake of his subject. What an inestimable boon it would be, if in every branch of literature there were only a few books, but those excellent! This can never happen, as long as money is to be made by writing. It seems as though the money lay under a curse; for every author degenerates as soon as he begins to put pen to paper in any way for the sake of gain. The best works of the greatest men all come from the time when they had to write for nothing or for very little.…

اقرأ العمل كاملًا ←

→ العودة إلى آرثر شوبنهاور