Reflexions sobre la Revolució Francesa
- Idioma:
- anglès
- Completesa:
- Obra completa
- Autoria:
- Escrita per l'autor
- Estat del text:
- Sense soroll d'escaneig detectat (mesura automàtica sobre tot el text, no revisada a mà)
- Extensió:
- ~130.000 paraules · 611 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
- APAEdmund Burke. (n.d.). Reflections on the Revolution in France [Reflexions sobre la Revolució Francesa]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/edmund-burke/reflections-on-the-revolution-in-france
- MLAEdmund Burke. Reflections on the Revolution in France [Reflexions sobre la Revolució Francesa]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/edmund-burke/reflections-on-the-revolution-in-france.
- ChicagoEdmund Burke. Reflections on the Revolution in France [Reflexions sobre la Revolució Francesa]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/edmund-burke/reflections-on-the-revolution-in-france.
Referència de l'edició que reprodueix SigPhi: SigPhi n'és la reproducció digital, no l'editor. L'any de l'edició no consta a les metadades (per això «n.d.») i el traductor només hi surt quan consta.
De què tracta
La critica de Burke a la Revolucio francesa, escrita el 1790, quan encara no havia arribat el Terror: el text fundacional del conservadorisme modern.
Context i història
Te forma de carta a un jove frances. L'argument de fons no es que la monarquia sigui sagrada, sino que una societat es un teixit d'habits, lleialtats i institucions que ningu no ha dissenyat i que ningu no pot refer de zero amb un pla racional sense destruir-la. D'aqui la seva desconfianca dels «drets de l'home» abstractes, oposats als drets concrets que una tradicio ha anat guanyant. Va vaticinar que la Revolucio acabaria en un general que ho manes tot. Paine hi va respondre amb «Els drets de l'home» i Wollstonecraft amb la «Vindicacio dels drets dels homes»; les tres obres son al corpus i val la pena llegir-les juntes.
Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.
satiated with the uniform round of its vapid dissipations. I should only stipulate that these new Mess-Johns in robes and coronets should keep some sort of hounds iii the democratic and levelling principles which are expected from their titled pulpits. The new evangelists will. I dare say, disappoint the hopes that are conceived of them. They will not become, literally as well as figuratively, polemic divines, nor be disposed so to drill their congregations that they may, as in former blessed times, preach their doctrines to regiments of dragoons, and corps of infantry and artillery. Such arrangements, however favourable to the cause of compulsory freedom, civil and religious, may not be equally conducive to the national tranquillity. These few restrictions I hope are no irreat stretches of intole ranee, no very violent exertions of despotism. Hut I may say of our preacher, " utinam nugxs tota ilia dedisset tempora scpvitiw." — All things in this his fulminating bull are not of so innoxious a tendency. His doctrines affect our constitution in its vital parts. He tells the Revolution Society, in this political sermon, that his majesty " is almost the only lawful king in the world, because the only one who owes his crown to the choice of his people?' As to the kings of the world, all of whom (except one) this archpontiff of the rights of men, with all the plenitude, and with more than the boldness of the papal deposing power in its meridian fervour of the twelfth century, puts into one sweeping clause of ban and anathema, and proclaims usurpers by circles of longitude and latitude, over the whole globe, it behoves them to consider how they admit into their territories these apostolic missionaries, who are to tell their subjects they are not lawful kings. That is their concern.…