L'origen de la família, la propietat privada i l'estat
- Idioma:
- anglès
- Completesa:
- Obra completa
- Autoria:
- Escrita per l'autor
- Estat del text:
- Sense soroll d'escaneig detectat (mesura automàtica sobre tot el text, no revisada a mà)
- Extensió:
- ~68.800 paraules · 327 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
- APAFriedrich Engels. (n.d.). The origin of the family, private property, and the state [L'origen de la família, la propietat privada i l'estat]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/friedrich-engels/the-origin-of-the-family-private-property-and-the-state
- MLAFriedrich Engels. The origin of the family, private property, and the state [L'origen de la família, la propietat privada i l'estat]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/friedrich-engels/the-origin-of-the-family-private-property-and-the-state.
- ChicagoFriedrich Engels. The origin of the family, private property, and the state [L'origen de la família, la propietat privada i l'estat]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/friedrich-engels/the-origin-of-the-family-private-property-and-the-state.
Referència de l’edició reproduïda. SigPhi és la reproducció digital, no l’editor. S’hi inclouen l’any, l’editorial i el traductor quan consten; «n.d.» indica que no consta l’any. La responsabilitat d’un pròleg o d’una nota es determina segons el passatge citat.
De què tracta
«L'origen de la família, la propietat privada i l'estat» (1884).
Context i història
Escrit a partir dels quaderns que Marx havia deixat en morir sobre l'antropòleg Lewis Morgan. La tesi —que la família monogàmica i l'estat neixen amb la propietat i no són naturals— va donar al feminisme del segle XX un dels seus arguments centrals. L'etnografia en què es basa ha quedat antiquada; l'argument, no. Traducció anglesa. L'alemany original d'Engels no és al catàleg.
Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.
Although the latter may extend over thousands of years, we have no means of proving its existence by direct evidence. But once the descent of man from the Animal Kingdom is acknowledged, the acceptance of this stage of transition becomes inevitable. 2. Middle Stage: Commencing with the utilization of fish (including crabs, mollusks and other aquatic animals) and the use of fire. Both these things belong together, because fish becomes thoroughly palatable by the help of fire only. With this new kind of food, human beings became completely independent of climate and locality. Following the course of rivers and coastlines, they could spread over the greater part of the earth even in the savage state. The so-called palaeolithic implements of the early stone age, made of rough, unsharpened stones, belong almost entirely to this period. Their wide distribution over all the continents testifies to the extent of these wanderings. The unceasing bent for discovery, together with the possession of fire gained by friction, created new products in the lately occupied regions. Such were farinaceous roots and tubers, baked in hot ashes or in baking pits (ground ovens). When the first weapons, club and spear, were invented, venison was occasionally added to the bill of fare. Nations subsisting exclusively by hunting, such as we sometimes find mentioned in books, have never existed; for the proceeds of hunting are too uncertain. In consequence of continued precariousness of the sources of sustenance, cannibalism seems to arise at this stage. It continues in force for a long while. Even in our day, Australians and Polynesians still remain in this middle stage of savagery. 3. Higher Stage: Coming with the invention of bow and arrow, this stage makes venison a regular part of daily fare and hunting a normal occupation.…