Fenomenologia de l'esperit
- Idioma:
- anglès
- Traducció:
- J. B. Baillie
- Completesa:
- Obra completa
- Autoria:
- Escrita per l'autor
- Estat del text:
- Sense soroll d'escaneig detectat (mesura automàtica sobre tot el text, no revisada a mà)
- Extensió:
- ~300.000 paraules · 1.444 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
- APAHegel. (n.d.). The Phenomenology of Mind (Baillie) [Fenomenologia de l'esperit] (J. B. Baillie, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/georg-wilhelm-friedrich-hegel/the-phenomenology-of-mind-baillie
- MLAHegel. The Phenomenology of Mind (Baillie) [Fenomenologia de l'esperit]. Translated by J. B. Baillie. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/georg-wilhelm-friedrich-hegel/the-phenomenology-of-mind-baillie.
- ChicagoHegel. The Phenomenology of Mind (Baillie) [Fenomenologia de l'esperit]. Translated by J. B. Baillie. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/georg-wilhelm-friedrich-hegel/the-phenomenology-of-mind-baillie.
Referència de l'edició que reprodueix SigPhi: SigPhi n'és la reproducció digital, no l'editor. L'any de l'edició no consta a les metadades (per això «n.d.») i el traductor només hi surt quan consta.
De què tracta
El camí de la consciència des de la certesa sensible fins al saber absolut, passant per l'amo i el serf, la consciència dissortada i l'esperit que es reconeix a si mateix.
Context i història
Hegel el va enllestir a Jena el 1807, segons ell mateix amb la batalla a prop. Aquesta versió és la traducció de J. B. Baillie, la primera completa a l'anglès: tradueix Geist per «Mind», i això ja és una lectura —les traduccions posteriors diuen «Spirit», que obre el terme cap a l'històric i el col·lectiu en comptes de tancar-lo en la ment individual.
Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.
' Still less must this kind of contentment, which holds sfcience in contempt, take upon itself to claim that raving obscurantism of this sort is something higher than science. These apocalyptic utterances pretend to occupy the very centre and the deepest depths ; they look askance at all definiteness and preciseness {opo<;) of meaning ; and they deliberately hold back from conceptual thinking and the constraining necessities of thought, as being the sort of reflection which, they say, can only feel at home in the sphere of finitude. But just as there is a breadth which is emptiness, there is a depth which is empty too : as we may have an extension of substance which overflows into finite multiplicity without the power of keeping the manifold together, in the same way we may have an insubstantial intensity which, keeping itself in as mere force without actual expression, is no better than superficiality. The force of mind is only as great as its expression ; its depth only as deep as its power to expand and lose itself when spending and giving out its substance. Moreover, when this unreflective emotional knowledge makes a pretext of having immersed its own very self in the depths of the absolute Being, and of philosophising in all hohness and truth, it hides from itself the fact that instead of devotion to God, it rather, by this contempt for aU measurable precision and definiteness, simply confirms in its own case the fortuitous character of its content, and on the other endows God with its own caprice. When such minds commit themselves to the unrestrained ferment of sheer emotion, they think that, by putting ■oil over self-consciousness, and surrendering all