Al-Ghazali — Lettere a Nizam al-Din Fakhr al-Mulk
- Lingua:
- inglese
- Stato:
- Opera completa
- Autorialità:
- Scritta dall'autore
- Stato del testo:
- Testo pulito
- Estensione:
- ~8000 parole · 38 passi
Cita quest'opera
- APAAl-Ghazali. (n.d.). Al-Ghazali — Lettere a Nizam al-Din Fakhr al-Mulk. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/al-ghazali/al-ghazali-letters-to-nizamuddin-fakhrul-mulk
- MLAAl-Ghazali. "Al-Ghazali — Lettere a Nizam al-Din Fakhr al-Mulk." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/it/works/al-ghazali/al-ghazali-letters-to-nizamuddin-fakhrul-mulk.
- ChicagoAl-Ghazali. Al-Ghazali — Lettere a Nizam al-Din Fakhr al-Mulk. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/al-ghazali/al-ghazali-letters-to-nizamuddin-fakhrul-mulk.
Di che cosa tratta
Lettere al visir Fakhr al-Mulk, figlio di Niẓām al-Mulk.
Contesto e storia
Il gruppo di lettere più lungo dell'insieme. Fakhr al-Mulk è l'uomo che convinse al-Ghazālī a insegnare di nuovo dopo undici anni di ritiro, il che dà a questa corrispondenza un peso biografico che le altre non hanno. Proviene dal Faḍā'il al-anām, la raccolta della corrispondenza persiana di al-Ghazālī, e figura nel catalogo come pezzo a sé. **Non è nessuna delle sue opere maggiori**: per quelle si vedano L'alchimia della felicità e Le confessioni di al-Ghazālī, anch'esse qui. L'originale è persiano; questa è una traduzione inglese.
Contesto editoriale, non una fonte citabile: a differenza dei passi dell'opera, questi dati non si possono verificare sul corpus.
Be it known that the flattering titles conferred on men are a devilish invention and as such are improper for a pious Muslim to accept. Our Holy Prophet, praise and peace be upon him, said: "I, as well as the humble and men in this community who fear Allah hate titles and high-sounding appellations." It is very important, therefore, that one must know the real meaning lying hidden in the title "Amir". One who has the virtues of a true amir both outwardly and inwardly is an amir even if people do not call him as such, and the one who lacks these qualities is not an amir, even though the entire world may call him an amir. According to the strict letter of Islam, an amir is the one who rules with absolute authority over his lusts and passions. The forces under his command belong to the various categories as stipulated in the Holy Koran: ".... none knows the hosts of your Lord except He. ..." Koran, Chapter 74 verse 31. There are three chiefs responsible for the discipline and maintenance of these forces: *Lust, which misdirects one to unhealthy and immoral activities. *Anger, which incites to murder. *Greed, involving dishonesty and corruption. If these chiefs could be presented in material form, the first would assume the form of a pig, the second of a dog and the third that of a devil. Mankind is divided into two classes. The first consists of those who control these three chiefs and force them to surrender to their will. Such men are kings and amirs though they appear in rags to the naked eye. The second category consists of those persons who cannot but obey and surrender to the will of these three masters. They are obstinate fools who call the slaves of passions and lust as kings, amir, and viziers. They would mislead you to believe that light is darkness, a thorn a rose and a howling desert a garden.…
Di cosa tratta Al-Ghazali — Lettere a Nizam al-Din Fakhr al-Mulk?Riassumi Al-Ghazali — Lettere a Nizam al-Din Fakhr al-Mulk brevementeQuali sono le idee chiave di Al-Ghazali — Lettere a Nizam al-Din Fakhr al-Mulk?
← Torna a Al-Ghazali