SigPhiSigPhi

L'anarchia difesa dagli anarchici

Emma Goldman

Lingua:
inglese
Stato:
Opera completa
Autorialità:
Scritta dall'autore
Stato del testo:
Testo pulito
Estensione:
~1470 parole · 7 passi
Cita quest'opera
  • APAEmma Goldman. (n.d.). L'anarchia difesa dagli anarchici. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/emma-goldman/anarchy-defended-by-anarchists
  • MLAEmma Goldman. "L'anarchia difesa dagli anarchici." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/it/works/emma-goldman/anarchy-defended-by-anarchists.
  • ChicagoEmma Goldman. L'anarchia difesa dagli anarchici. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/emma-goldman/anarchy-defended-by-anarchists.

Di che cosa tratta

Un dialogo giornalistico giovanile (1896) in cui Goldman e Johann Most difendono l'anarchismo davanti al grande pubblico.

Contesto e storia

Un testo di gioventù e di divulgazione: interessa soprattutto per come si spiegava l'anarchismo ai lettori di un giornale di massa, dieci anni dopo Haymarket. Questo è un articolo breve, non un libro: la sua lunghezza nel catalogo non è un difetto della copia. Buona parte dell'opera di Goldman ha questa forma, sulla sua rivista Mother Earth e in opuscoli.

Contesto editoriale, non una fonte citabile: a differenza dei passi dell'opera, questi dati non si possono verificare sul corpus.

Come comincia
To most Americans Anarchy is an evil-sounding word -- another name for wickedness, perversity, and chaos. Anarchists are looked upon as a herd of uncombed, unwashed, and vile ruffians, bent on killing the rich and dividing their capital. Anarchy, however, to its followers actually signifies a social theory which regards the union of order with the absence of all government of man by man; in short, it means perfect individual liberty. If the meaning of Anarchy has so far been interpreted as a state of the greatest disorder, it is because people have been taught that their affairs are regulated, that they are ruled wisely, and that authority is a necessity. In by-gone centuries any person who asserted that mankind could get along without the aid of worldly and spiritual authority was considered a madman, and was either placed in a lunatic asylum or burned at the stake; whereas to-day hundreds of thousands of men and women are infidels who scorn the idea of a supernatural Being. The freethinkers of to-day, for instance, still believe in the necessity of the State, which protects society; they do not desire to know the history of our barbarian institutions. They do not understand that government did not and cannot exist without oppression; that every government has committed dark deeds and great crimes against society. The development of government has been in the order, despotism, monarchy, oligarchy, plutocracy; but it has always been a tyranny. It cannot be denied that there are a large number of wise and well-meaning people who are anxious to better the present conditions, but they have not sufficiently emancipated themselves from the prejudices and superstitions of the dark ages to understand the true inwardness of the institution called government. "How can we get along without government?" ask these people. "If our government is bad let us try to have a good one, but we must have government by all means!…

Leggi l'opera intera →

← Torna a Emma Goldman