Reflections on Violence
- Lingua:
- inglese
- Traduzione:
- T. E. Hulme
- Stato:
- Opera completa
- Autorialità:
- Scritta dall'autore
- Stato del testo:
- Testo pulito
- Estensione:
- ~110.000 parole · 541 passi
Cita quest'opera
- APAGeorges Sorel. (n.d.). Reflections on Violence. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/georges-sorel/reflections-on-violence
- MLAGeorges Sorel. "Reflections on Violence." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/it/works/georges-sorel/reflections-on-violence.
- ChicagoGeorges Sorel. Reflections on Violence. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/georges-sorel/reflections-on-violence.
Di che cosa tratta
Il libro del 1908 in cui Sorel difende lo sciopero generale non come una tattica ma come un «mito»: un'immagine che spinge gli uomini ad agire anche se non deve mai realizzarsi come se la figurano.
Contesto e storia
È uno dei testi più scomodi del corpus, e conviene dire perché. Sorel veniva dal marxismo e lo trovava troppo razionalista: sosteneva che le masse non si muovono per calcolo ma per immagini totali, e che il sindacalismo rivoluzionario dovesse conservare la propria capacità di conflitto invece di negoziarla. Distingueva la «violenza» proletaria dalla «forza» dello Stato, e disprezzava la democrazia parlamentare come un modo di spegnere il conflitto. Queste idee furono raccolte tanto dalla sinistra sindacalista quanto dal fascismo italiano, e Sorel stesso simpatizzò con Lenin alla fine della vita. È nel corpus perché è un pezzo reale della storia delle idee, e va letto sapendo dove andò a finire.
Contesto editoriale, non una fonte citabile: a differenza dei passi dell'opera, questi dati non si possono verificare sul corpus.
My dear Halevy — I should doubtless have left these studies buried in the bound volumes of a review if some friends, whose judgment I value, had not. thought that it would be a good thing to bring them before the notice of a wider public, as they serve to make better known one of the most singular social phenomena that history records. But it seemed to me that it would be necessary to give this public some additional explanations, since I cannot often expect to find judges as indulgent as you have been. When I published, in the Mouvement Socialiste, the articles which are now collected in this volume, I did not write with the intention of composing a book : I simply wrote down my reflections as they came into my mind. I knew that the subscribers to that review would have no difficulty in following me, since they were already famiHar with the theories, which for some years my friends and I had developed in its pages. But I am convinced that the readers of this book, on the contrary, will be very bewildered if I do not submit a kind of defence which will enable them to consider things from my own habitual point of view. In the course of our conversations, you have sometimes made remarks which fitted so well into the system of my own ideas that they often led me to investigate certain questions more thoroughly. I am sure that the reflections which I here submit to you, and which you have provoked, will be very useful to those who wish to read this book with profit. There are perhaps few studies in which the defects of my method of writing are more evident ; I have been frequently reproached for not respecting the rules of the art of writing, to which all our contemporaries submit, and for thus inconveniencing my readers by the disorder of my explanations. I have tried to render the text clearer by numerous corrections of detail, but I have not been able to make the disorder disappear.…