Creative Evolution
- Lingua:
- inglese
- Stato:
- Opera completa
- Autorialità:
- Scritta dall'autore
- Stato del testo:
- Con errori di scansione (misura automatica su tutto il testo, non verificata a mano) · 10 passi illeggibili, esclusi dalle risposte
- Estensione:
- ~180.000 parole · 844 passi
Cita quest'opera
- APAHenri Bergson. (n.d.). Creative Evolution. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution
- MLAHenri Bergson. Creative Evolution. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/it/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution.
- ChicagoHenri Bergson. Creative Evolution. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution.
Riferimento all’edizione riprodotta. SigPhi è la riproduzione digitale. Anno, editore e traduttore compaiono quando noti; «n.d.» indica un anno sconosciuto.
Di che cosa tratta
La proposta di Bergson che l'evoluzione non si spieghi né col caso né con un piano prestabilito, ma con uno slancio — l'élan vital — che tenta vie e si ripartisce in direzioni divergenti.
Contesto e storia
Uscito nel 1907, ebbe un successo enorme fuori dalla filosofia e ne fece una celebrità; nel 1927 gli diedero il Nobel per la letteratura. La parte che ha retto meglio non è l'élan vital, che la biologia non accettò mai, ma la critica del modo in cui l'intelletto fabbrica il tempo: Bergson sostiene che il pensiero, fatto per l'azione, muta la durata in una successione di istanti immobili, e che per questo non può pensare ciò che cambia.
Contesto editoriale, non una fonte citabile: a differenza dei passi dell'opera, questi dati non si possono verificare sul corpus.
From this survival of the past it follows that consciousness cannot go through the same state twice. The circumstances may still be the same, but they will act no longer on the same person, since they find him at a new moment of his history. Our personality, which is being built up each instant with its accumulated experience, changes without ceasing. By changing, it prevents any state, although superficially identical with another, from ever repeating it in its very depth. That is why our duration is irreversible. We could not live over again a single moment, for we should have to begin by effacing the memory of all that had followed. Even could we erase this memory from our intellect, we could not from our will. Thus our personality shoots, grows and ripens without ceasing. Each of its moments is something new added to what was before. We may go further: it is not only something new, but something unforeseeable. Doubtless, my present state is explained by what was in me and by what was acting on me a moment ago. In analyzing it I should find no other elements. But even a superhuman intelligence would not have been able to foresee the simple indivisible form which gives to these purely abstract elements their concrete organization. For to foresee consists of projecting into the future what has been perceived in the past, or of imagining for a later time a new grouping, in a new order, of elements already perceived. But that which has never been perceived, and which is at the same time simple, is necessarily unforeseeable. Now such is the case with each of our states, regarded as a moment in a history that is gradually unfolding: it is simple, and it cannot have been already perceived, since it concentrates in its indivisibility all that has been perceived and what the present is adding to it besides. It is an original moment of a no less original history.