SigPhiSigPhi

Le tre fonti e le tre parti costitutive del marxismo

Vladimir Lenin

Lingua:
inglese
Stato:
Opera completa
Autorialità:
Scritta dall'autore
Stato del testo:
Nessun rumore di scansione rilevato (misura automatica su tutto il testo, non verificata a mano)
Estensione:
~2320 parole · 11 passi
Cita quest'opera
  • APAVladimir Lenin. (n.d.). The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism [Le tre fonti e le tre parti costitutive del marxismo]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/vladimir-lenin/the-three-sources-and-three-component-parts-of-marxism
  • MLAVladimir Lenin. The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism [Le tre fonti e le tre parti costitutive del marxismo]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/it/works/vladimir-lenin/the-three-sources-and-three-component-parts-of-marxism.
  • ChicagoVladimir Lenin. The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism [Le tre fonti e le tre parti costitutive del marxismo]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/vladimir-lenin/the-three-sources-and-three-component-parts-of-marxism.

Riferimento dell'edizione che SigPhi riproduce: SigPhi ne è la riproduzione digitale, non l'editore. L'anno dell'edizione non figura nei metadati (da qui «n.d.») e il traduttore compare solo quando è noto.

Di che cosa tratta

Un articolo del 1913: il marxismo viene dalla filosofia tedesca, dall'economia inglese e dal socialismo francese.

Contesto e storia

Tre pagine che hanno fissato per settant'anni il modo in cui il marxismo sarebbe stato insegnato. La brevità è dell'articolo stesso: un testo divulgativo, non un libro. L'originale è in RUSSO. Questa è una traduzione inglese; per citare, l'originale.

Contesto editoriale, non una fonte citabile: a differenza dei passi dell'opera, questi dati non si possono verificare sul corpus.

Come comincia
Where the bourgeois economists saw a relation between things (the exchange of one commodity for another) Marx revealed a relation between people. The exchange of commodities expresses the connection between individual producers through the market. Money signifies that the connection is becoming closer and closer, inseparably uniting the entire economic life of the individual producers into one whole. Capital signifies a further development of this connection: man’s labour-power becomes a commodity. The wage-worker sells his labour-power to the owner of land, factories and instruments of labour. The worker spends one part of the day covering the cost of maintaining himself and his family (wages), while the other part of the day he works without remuneration, creating for the capitalist surplus-value, the source of profit, the source of the wealth of the capitalist class. The doctrine of surplus-value is the corner-stone of Marx’s economic theory. Capital, created by the labour of the worker, crushes the worker, ruining small proprietors and creating an army of unemployed. In industry, the victory of large-scale production is immediately apparent, but the same phenomenon is also to be observed in agriculture, where the superiority of large-scale capitalist agriculture is enhanced, the use of machinery increases and the peasant economy, trapped by money-capital, declines and falls into ruin under the burden of its backward technique. The decline of small-scale production assumes different forms in agriculture, but the decline itself is an indisputable fact. By destroying small-scale production, capital leads to an increase in productivity of labour and to the creation of a monopoly position for the associations of big capitalists. Production itself becomes more and more social—hundreds of thousands and millions of workers become bound together in a regular economic organism—but the product of this collective labour is appropriated by a handful of capitalists.…

Leggi l'opera intera →

← Torna a Vladimir Lenin