SigPhiSigPhi

Dizionario filosofico (VII)

Voltaire

⚠️ Avviso sul contenuto

Lingua:
inglese
Traduzione:
William F. Fleming
Stato:
Scelta o opera parziale
Autorialità:
Scritta dall'autore
Stato del testo:
Nessun rumore di scansione rilevato (misura automatica su tutto il testo, non verificata a mano)
Estensione:
~77.700 parole · 369 passi
Cita quest'opera
  • APAVoltaire. (n.d.). A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07 [Dizionario filosofico (VII)] (William F. Fleming, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-07
  • MLAVoltaire. A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07 [Dizionario filosofico (VII)]. Translated by William F. Fleming. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/it/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-07.
  • ChicagoVoltaire. A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07 [Dizionario filosofico (VII)]. Translated by William F. Fleming. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-07.

Riferimento all’edizione riprodotta. SigPhi è la riproduzione digitale. Anno, editore e traduttore compaiono quando noti; «n.d.» indica un anno sconosciuto.

Di che cosa tratta

Volume 7 di dieci del Dizionario filosofico. Ignoranza – Leggi. Gli articoli sulle leggi e sulla giustizia.

Contesto e storia

La forma è l'argomento: un dizionario si consulta invece di leggerlo di seguito, il che lo rendeva impossibile da confutare nel suo insieme e facile da far circolare sottobanco. Voltaire lo pubblicò anonimo nel 1764 e fu bruciato a Ginevra e a Parigi. Una nota sull'edizione: il catalogo ha DUE edizioni del Dizionario filosofico — questa in dieci volumi e un Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary in volume unico. Non sono un doppione: sono selezioni e traduzioni diverse, e gli articoli non si corrispondono uno a uno. L'originale è francese.

Contesto editoriale, non una fonte citabile: a differenza dei passi dell'opera, questi dati non si possono verificare sul corpus.

Estratto dell’edizione disponibile
Perhaps, by attending a little to the progress of his life, and the nature of his character, we may discover what it was that inspired him with so strong an aversion to Christianity. The emperor Constantine, his great-uncle, who had placed the new religion on the throne, was stained by the murder of his wife, his son, his brother-in­law, his nephew, and his father-in-law. The three children of Constantine began their bloody and baleful reign, with murdering their uncle and their cousins. From that time followed a series of civil wars and murders. The father, the brother, and all the relations of Julian, and even Julian himself, were marked down for destruction by Constantius, his uncle. He escaped this general massacre, but the first years of his life were passed in exile, and he at last owed the preservation of his life, his fortune, and the title of Cæsar, only to Eusebia, the wife of his uncle Constantius, who, after having had the cruelty to proscribe his infancy, had the imprudence to appoint him Cæsar, and the still further and greater imprudence of then persecuting him. He was, in the first instance, a witness of the insolence with which a certain bishop treated his benefactress Eusebia. He was called Leontius, and was bishop of Tripoli. He sent information to the empress, "that he would not visit her unless she would consent to receive him in a manner corresponding to his episcopal dignity--that is, that she should advance to receive him at the door, that she should receive his benediction in a bending attitude, and that she should remain standing until he granted her permission to be seated." The Pagan pontiffs were not in the habit of treating princesses precisely in this manner, and such brutal arrogance could not but make a deep impression on the mind of a young man attached at once to philosophy and simplicity.

Leggi questa edizione →

← Torna a Voltaire