r Vid, Jer. ix. 3. and xv. 18; Deut. xxxii. 20, LXX.; ib. xxxil.
6 Here is a protest beforehand against the Monophysite doctrine, but such anticipations of various heresies are too frequent, as we proceed, to require or bear notice. re.
7 Ocds év capki, vid. Adyos ev o. ili, 54. a. O. Ev THpaTE, Il. 12. c. 15. a. A. ev cH. Sent. D. 8 fin.
Ad Word’s servant, which by Him came to be, and was made.
11. Hence it holds that the Apostle’s expression, ‘He made,’ does not prove that the Word is made, but that body, which He took like ours; and in consequence He is called our brother, as having become man. But if it has been shewn, that, even though the word ‘made’ be referred to the Very Word, it is used for ‘begat,’ what further perverse expedient will they be able to fall upon, now that the present discussion has cleared up the word in every point of view, and shewn that the Son is not a work, but in Essence indeed the Father’s offspring, while in the Economy, according to the good pleasure® of the Father, He was on our behalf made, and consists as man? For this reason then it is said by the Apostle, ‘Who was faithful to Him that made Him;’ and in the Proverbs, even creation is spoken of. For so long as we are confessing that He became man, there is no question about saying, as was observed before, whether ‘He became,’ or ‘He has been made,’ or ‘created,’ or ‘formed,’ or ‘ servant,’ or ‘son of an handmaid,’ or ‘son of man,’ or ‘ was constituted,’ or ‘took His journey,’ or ‘ bridegroom,’ or ‘brother’s son,’ or ‘brother.’ All these terms happen to be proper to man’s constitution; and such as these do not designate the Essence of the Word, but that He has become man.
GHAPTER: XV.
GHAPTER: XV.
TExTs EXPLAINED; Firraty, ACTS ii. 36.
The Aegula Fidei must be observed; made applies to our Lord’s manhood; and to His manifestation; and to His office relative to us; and is relative to the Jews. Parallel instance in Gen. xxvii. 20, 37. The context contradicts the Arian interpretation.
11 (continued). THE same is the meaning of the passage in the Acts which they also allege, that in which Peter says, that ‘ He hath made both Lord and Christ that same Jesus whom ye have crucified.’ For here too it is not written, ‘ He made for Himself a Son,’ or ‘ He made Himself a Word,’ that they should have such notions. If then it has not escaped thei memory, that they speak concerning the Son of God, let them make search whether it is anywhere written, ‘God made Himself a Son,’ or ‘He created for Himself a Word;’ or again, whether it is anywhere written in plain terms, ‘The Word is a work or creation;’ and then let them proceed to make their case, the in sensate men, that here too they may receive their answer. But if they can produce nothing ¥ Kar’ eddoxlay Orat. iii. 64. init.
of the kind, and only catch at such stray expressions as ‘ He made’ and ‘He has been made,’ I fear lest, from hearing, ‘In the beginning God made the heaven and the earth,’ and ‘He made the sun and the moon,’ and ‘He made the sea,’ they should come in time to call the Word the heaven, and the Light which took place on the first day, and the earth, and each particular thing that has been made, so as to end in resembling the Stoics, as they are called, the one drawing out their God into all things*, the other ranking God’s Word with each work in particular; which they have well nigh done already, saying that He is one of His works.
12. But here they must have the same answer as before, and first be told that the Word is a Son, as has been said above?, and not a work, and that such terms are not to be understood of His Godhead, but the reason and manner of them investigated. To persons who so inquire, the human Economy will plainly present itself, which He undertook for our sake. For Peter, after saying, ‘He hath made Lord and Christ,’ straightway added, ‘this Jesus whom ye crucified;’ which makes it plain to any one, even, if so be, to them, provided they attend to the context, that not the Essence of the Word, but He according to His manhood is said to have been made. For what was crucified but the body? and howcould be signified what was bodily in the Word, except by saying ‘He made?’ Especially has that phrase, ‘ He made,’ a meaning consistent with orthodoxy; in that he has not said, as I observed before, ‘He made Him Word,’ but ‘He made Him Lord,’ nor that in general terms3, but ‘towards’ us, and ‘in the midst of’ us, as much as to say, ‘ He manifested Him.’ And this Peter himself, when he began this primary teaching, carefully 4 expressed, when he said to them, ‘Ye men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man manifested of God towards you by miracles, and wonders, and signs, which God did by Him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves know 5.’ Consequently the term which he uses in the end, ‘made,’ this He has explained in the beginning by ‘manifested,’ for by the signs and wonders which the Lord did, He was manifested to be not merely man, but God in a body and Lord also, the Christ. Such also is the passage in the Gospel according to John, ‘ Therefore the more did the Jews persecute Him, because He not only broke the Sabbath, but said also that God was His own Father, making Himself DISCOURSETIE ee ee ee equal with God®’ For the Lord did not then fashion Himself to be God, nor indeed is a made God conceivable, but He manifested it by the works, saying, ‘ Though ye believe not Me, believe My works, that ye may know that TI am in the Father, and the Father in Me7,’ Thus then the Father has ‘made’ Him Lord and King in the midst of us, and towards us who were once disobedient; and it is plain that He who is now displayed as Lord and King, does not then begin to be King and Lord, but begins to shew His Lordship, and to extend it even over the disobedient.
13. If then they suppose that the Saviour was not Lord and King, even before He became man and endured the Cross, but then began to be Lord, let them know that they are openly reviving the statements of the Samosatene. But if, as we have quoted and declared above, He is Lord and King everlasting, seeing that Abraham worships Him as Lord, and Moses says, ‘ Then the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven®;’ and David in the Psalms, ‘The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit Thou on My right hand 9;’ and, ‘ Thy Throne, O God, is for ever and ever; a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of Thy Kingdom’°;’ and, ‘Thy Kingdom is an everlasting Kingdom";’ it is plain that even before He became man, He was King and Lord everlasting, being Image and Word of the Father. And the Word being everlasting Lord and King, it is very plain again that Peter said not that the Essence of the Son was made, but spoke of His Lordship over us, which ‘became’ when He became man, and, redeeming all by the Cross, became Lord of all and King. But if they continue the argument on the ground of its being written, ‘ He made,’ not willing that ‘ He made’ should be taken in the sense of ‘He manifested,’ either from want of apprehension, or from their Christ-opposing purpose, let them attend to another sound exposition of Peter’s words. For he who becomes Lord of others, comes into the possession of beings already in existence; but if the Lord is Framer of all and everlasting King, and when He became man, then gained possession of us, here too is a way in which Peter’s language evidently does not signify that the Essence of the Word is a work, but the after-subjection of all things, and the Saviour’s Lordship which came to be over all. And this coincides with what we said before”; for as we then introduced the words, ‘ Become my God and defence,’ and ‘the Lord became a refuge for the oppressed,’ and it stood to reason that these expressions do not shew that God is originate, but that His beneficence ‘becomes’ towards each individual, the same sense has the expression of Peter also.
14. For the Son of God indeed, being Himself the Word, is Lord of all; but we once were subject from the first to the slavery of corruption and the curse of the Law, then by degrees fashioning for ourselves things that were not, we served, as says the blessed Apostle, ‘ them which by nature are no Gods *,’ and, ignorant of the true God, we preferred things that were not to the truth; but afterwards, as the ancient people when oppressed in Egypt groaned, so, when we too had the Law ‘ engrafted 2’ in us, and according to the unutterable sighings 3 of the Spirit made our intercession, ‘O Lord our God, take possession of us 4,’ then, as ‘He became for a house of refuge’ and a ‘God and defence,’ so also He became our Lord. Nor did He then begin to be, but we began to have Him for our Lord. For upon this, God being good and Father of the Lord, in pity, and desiring to be known by all, makes His own Son put on Him a human body and become man, and.be called Jesus, that in this body offering Himself for all, He might deliver all from false worship and corruption, and might Himself become of all Lord and King. His becoming therefore in this way Lord and King, this it is that Peter means by, ‘ He hath made Him Lord,’ and ‘hath sent Christ;’ as much as to say, that the Father in making Him man (for to be made belongs to man), did not simply make Him man, but has made Him in order to His being Lord of all men, and to His hallowing all through the Anointing. For though the Word existing in the form of God took a servant’s form, yet the assumption of the flesh did not make a servants of the Word, who was by nature Lord; but rather, not only was it that emancipation of all humanity which takes place by the Word, but that very Word who was by nature Lord, and was then made man, hath by means of a servant’s form been made Lord of all and Christ, that is, in order to hallow all by the Spirit. And as God, when ‘becoming a God and defence,’ and saying, ‘I will be a God to them,’ does not then become God more than before, nor then begins to become God, but, what He ever is, that He then becomes to those who need Him, when it 12 Ps, lxxi. 3. stony rock, E. V. Ps. ix. 9. defence.
3 Rom. viii. 26. 4 Is, xxvi. 13. LXX.
5 ovk eSovAov Tov Adyov: though, as he said supr. § 10, the Word became a servant, as far as He was man. He says the same thing Zp. Hg 17. So say Naz. Orai. 32. 18. Nyssen. ad Simpl. (t 2. p. 47%.) Cyril. Alex. adv. Theoto;. p. 223. Hilay.
fe Trin. xi. Ambros. 1. ZA/. 46, 3.
Aa 2 pleascth Him, so Christ also being by nature Lord and King everlasting, does not become Lord more than He was at the time He is sent forth, nor then begins to be Lord and King, but what He is ever, that He then is made according to the flesh; and, having redeemed all, He becomes thereby again Lord of quick and dead. For Him henceforth do all things serve, and this is David’s meaning in the Psalm, ‘ The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit Thou on My right hand, until I make Thine enemies Thy footstool ®’ For it was fitting that the redemption should take place through none other than Him who is the Lord by nature, lest, though created by the Son, we should name another Lord, and fall into the Arian and Greek folly, serving the creature beyond the all-creating God’.
15. This, at least according to my nothingness, is the meaning of this passage; moreover, a true and a good meaning have these words of Peter as regards the Jews. For Jews, astray from the truth, expect indeed the Christ as coming, but do not reckon that He undergoes a passion, saying what they understand not; ‘We know that, when the Christ cometh, He abideth for ever, and how sayest Thou, that He must be lifted up®?? Next they suppose Him, not the Word coming in flesh, but a mere man, as were all the kings. The Lord then, admonishing Cleopas and the other, taught them that the Christ must first suffer; and the rest of the Jews that God was come among them, saying, ‘If He called them gods to whom the word of God came, and the Scripture cannot be broken, say ye of Him whom the Father hath sanctified and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest, because I said, I am the Son of God9??
16. Peter then, having learned this from the Saviour, in both points set the Jews right, saying, “O Jews, the divine Scriptures announce that Christ cometh, and you consider Him a mere man as one of David’s descendants, whereas what is written of Him shews Him to be not such as you say, but rather announces Him as Lord and God, and immortal, and dispenser of life. For Moses has said, ‘Ye shall see your Life hanging before your eyes?.’ And David in the hundred and ninth Psalm, ‘The Lord said unto My Lord, Sit Thou on My right hand, till I make Thine enemies Thy footstool?;’ and in the fifteenth, ‘Thou shalt not leave my soul in hades, neither 7 Vid. Rom. i. 25. and so both text and application very frequently, e.g. Hf. 4g. 4. e. 13. c. Vid. supr. 1. 8, note 8, infr. iii. 16. note 8 John xii. 34, not to the letter.
© Deut. xxvii. 66. Vid. [de Zncar. 35. The text is frequentl thus explained by the Fathers], 2 Ps, cx. 1.: ‘, shalt Thou suffer Thy Holy One to see corruption 3.’ Now that these passages have not David for their scope he himself witnesses, avowing that He who was coming was His own Lord. Nay you yourselves know that He is dead, and His remains are with you. That the Christ then must be such as the Scriptures say, you will plainly confess yourselves. For those announcements come from God, and in them falsehood cannot be. If then ye can state that such a one has come before, and can prove him God from the signs and wonders which he did, ye have reason for maintaining the contest, but if ye are not able to prove His coming, but are expecting such an one still, recognise the true season from Daniel, for his words relate to the present time. But if this present season be that which was of old afore-announced, and ye have seen what has taken place among us, be sure that this Jesus, whom ye crucified, this is the expected Christ. For David and all the Prophets died, and the sepulchres of all are with you, but that Resurrection which has now taken place, has shewn that the scope of these passages is Jesus. For the crucifixion is denoted by ‘Ye shall see your Life hanging,’ and the wound in the side by the spear answers to ‘ He was led as a sheep to the slaughter+,’ and the resurrection, nay more, the rising of the ancient dead from out their sepulchres (for these most of you have seen), this is, ‘Thou shalt not leave My soul in hades,’ and ‘ He swallowed up death in strengths,’ and again, ‘God will wipe away.’ For the signs which actually took place shew that He who was in a body was God, and also the Life and Lord of death. For it became the Christ, when giving life to others, Himself not to be detained by death; but this could not have happened, had He, as you suppose, been a mere man. But in truth He is the Son of God, for men are all subject to death. Let no one therefore doubt, but the whole house of Israel know assuredly that this Jesus, whom ye saw in shape a man, doing signs and such works, as no one ever yet had done, is Himself the Christ and Lord of all. For though made man, and called JrEsus, as we said before, He received no loss by that human passion, but rather, in being made man, He is manifested as Lord of quick and dead. For since, as the Apostle said, ‘in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe®’ And so, since we men would not acknowledge God through His Word, nor serve the Word of God our 5 Is. xxv. 8 DISGOURSESIL natural Master, it pleased God to shew in man His own Lordship, and so to draw all men to Himself. But to do this by a mere man beseemed not7; lest, having man for our Lord, we should become worshippers of man ®&. ‘Therefore the Word Himself became flesh, and the Father called His Name Jesus, and so ‘made’ Him Lord and Christ, as much as to say, ‘He made Him to rule and to reign; that while in the Name of Jesus, whom ye crucified, every knee bows, we may acknowledge as Lord and King both the Son and through Him the Father.”
17. The Jews then, most of them’, hearing this, came to themselves and forthwith acknowledged the Christ, as it is written in the Acts. But, the Ario-maniacs on the contrary choose to remain Jews, and to contend with Peter; so let us proceed to place before them some parallel phrases; perhaps it may have some effect upon them, to find what the usage is of divine Scripture. Now that Christ is everlasting Lord and King, has become plain by what has gone before, nor is there a man to doubt about it; for being Son of God, He must be like Him2, and being like, He is certainly both Lord and King, for He says Himself, ‘He that hath seen Me, hath seen the Father.’ On the other hand, that Peter’s mere words, ‘He hath made Him both Lord and Christ,’ do not imply the Son to be a creature, may be seen from Isaac’s blessing, though this illustration is but a faint one for our subject. Now he said to Jacob, ‘ Become thou lord over thy brother;’ and to Esau, ‘Behold, I have made him thy lord 3,’ though the word ‘made’ had implied Jacob’s essence and the coming into being, even then it would not be right in them as much as to imagine the same of the Word of God, for the Son of God is no creature as Jacob was; besides, they might inquire and so rid themselves of that extravagance. But if they do not understand it of his essence nor of his coming into being, though Jacob was by nature creature and work, is not their madness worse than the Devil’s 4, if what they dare not ascribe in consequence of a like phrase even to things by nature originate, that they attach to the Son of God, saying that He is a creature? For Isaac said ‘Become’ and ‘I have made,’ signifying neither the coming into being nor the essence of Jacob (for after thirty years and 7 In the text the Mediatorial Lordship is made an office of God Word: still, not as God, but as man. Cf. Augustine, Trin. i. La In like manner the Priesthood is the office of God in the form of man, supr. 8, note 4. And so again none but the Eternal Son could be mpwréroxos, yet He is'so called when sent as Creator and as incarnate. infr. 64. F 8 Infr. iii. 32 fin.
r ofrAeiorot. [An exaggeration, cf. Rom. xi. 7, &c.]
2 § 22, note. 4 Alluding to the temptation.
Now: more from his birth he said this); but his authority over his brother, which came to pass subsequently.
18. Much more then did Peter say this without meaning that the Essence of the Word was a work; for he knew Him to be God’s Son, confessing, ‘Thou art the Christ, the Son of the Living Gods; but he meant His Kingdom and Lordship which was formed and came to be according to grace, and was relatively to us. For while saying this, he was not silent about the Son of God’s everlasting Godhead which is the Father’s; but He had said already, that He had poured the Spirit on us; now to give the Spirit with autnority, is not in the power of creature or work, but the Spirit is God’s Gift®. For the creatures are hallowed by the Holy Spirit; but the Son, in that He is not hallowed by the Spirit, but on the contrary Himself the Giver of it to all7, is therefore no creature, but true Son of the Father. And yet He who gives the Spirit, the same is said also to be made; that is, to be made among us Lord because of His manhood, while giving the Spirit because He is God’s Word. For He ever was and is, as Son, so also Lord and Sovereign of all, being like in all things® to the Father, and having all that is the Father’s9, as He Himself has said 7°, *“ CHAPTER XVI.
INTRODUCTORY TO PROVERBS Vili. 22, THAT THE SON IS NOT A CREATURE.
Arian formula, a creature but not as one of the creatures; but each creature is unlike all other creatures; and no creature can create. The Word then differs from all creatures in that in which they, though otherwise differing, all agree together, as creatures; viz. in being an efficient cause; in being the one medium or instrumental agent in creation; moreover in being the revealer of the Father; and in being the object of worship.
18. (continued). Now in the next place let us consider the passage in the Proverbs, ‘The Lord created me a beginning of His ways for His works';’ although in shewing that the Word is no work, it has been also shewn that He is no creature. For it is the same 6 Qeod Sapov. And so more distinctly S. Basil, d@pov tov God G -jpe. de Sp. S. 57, and more frequently the later Latins, a ihe Hymn, ¢ Altissimi Donum Dei;’ and the earlier, e.g. Hil. de Trin. ii. 29. and August. Trin. xv- 29. V. 15, Petav. 77in. 7 Supr. ch. xii. 8 Omovos Kara mara. vid. i1t..
‘ 9 Vid. infr. note on Orvat?. ili. 1. 10 Vic.
ied ae er 22. {This text, which had been immemorially i the Adyos (sup. p- 168, note 7), and which in the false Toe of the ree favoured the Arian side], is presently explained at greater length than any other of the ext he handles, forming the chief subject of the Oration henceforth, after an introduction which extends down to 44.
to say work or creature, so that the proof that He is no work is a proof also that He is no creature. Whereas one may marvel at these men, thus devising excuses to be irreligious, and nothing daunted at the refutations which meet them upon every point. For first they set about deceiving the simple by their questions, ‘Did He who is make from that which was not one that was not or.one that was3?’ and, ‘Had you a son before begetting him+?’ And when this had been proved worthless, next they invented the question, ‘Is the Unoriginate one or two5?’ Then, when in this they had been confuted, straightway they formed another, ‘Has He free-will and an alterable nature®?’ But being forced to give up this, next they set about saying, ‘Being made so much better than the Angels7;’ and when the truth exposed this pretence, now again, collecting them all together, they think to recommend their heresy by ‘work’ and ‘creature 8,’ For they mean those very things over again, and are true to their own perverseness, putting into various shapes and turning to and fro the same errors, if so be to deceive some by that variousness. Although then abundant proof has been given above of this their reckless expedient, yet, since they make all places sound with this passage from the Proverbs, and to many who are ignorant of the faith of Christians, seem to say somewhat, it is necessary to examine separately, ‘He created’ as well as ‘Who was faithful to Him that made Him?;’ that, as in all others, so in this text also, they may be proved to have got no further than a fantasy.
1g. And first let us see the answers, which they returned to Alexander of blessed memory, in the outset, while their heresy was in course of formation. They wrote thus: ‘He is a creature, but not as one of the creatures; a work, but not as one of the works; an offspring, but not as one of the offsprings*.’ Let every one consider the profligacy and craft of this heresy; for knowing the bitterness of its own malignity, it makes an effort to trick itself out with fair words, and says, what indeed it means, that He is a creature, yet thinks to be able to screen itself by adding, ‘but not as one of the creatures.’ However, in thus writing, they rather convict themselves of irreligion; for if, in your opinion, He is simply 2 From the methodical manner in which the successive portions of his foregoing Oration are here referred to, it would almost seem asif he were answering in course some Arian work. vid. also sapr. Orat. 1. 37, 53. infr. Orat. iii. 26. He does not seem to be tracing the controversy historically. 3 Supr. ch. vii. 4 Ch, viii.
BaChwax. © Ch. x. 7 Ch, xiii. 8 Ch. xiv. and xv.
9 Ch. xiv. Heb. iii. 2.
t Vid. Arius’s letter, de Syn. 16. This’ was the sophism by means of which Valens succeeded with the Fathers of Arminium, vid. S. Jerome i Luciferian. 18. vid. also in Eusebius, supr. Ep. Eus. 6s a creature, why add the pretence, ‘but not as one of the creatures?’ And if He is simply a work, how ‘not as one of the works?’ In which we may see the poison of the heresy. For by saying, ‘offspring, but not as one of the offsprings,’ they reckon many sons, and one of these they pronounce to be the Lord; so that according to them He 1s no more Only-begotten, but one out of many brethren, and is called3 offspring and son. What use then is this pretence of saying that He is a creature and not a creature? for though ye shall say, Not as ‘one of the creatures,’ I will prove this sophism of yours to be foolish. For still ye pronounce Him to be one of the creatures; and whatever a man might say of the other creatures, such ye hold concerning the Son, ye truly ‘fools and blind4.’ For is any one of the creatures just what another is 5, that ye should predicate this of the Son as some prerogative? And all the visible creation was made in six days:—in the first, the light which He called day; in the second the firmament; in the third, gathering together the waters, He bared the dry land, and brought out the various fruits that are in it; and in the fourth, He made the sun and the moon and all the host of the stars; and on the fifth, He created the race of living things in the sea, and of birds in the air; and on the sixth, He made the quadrupeds: on the earth, and at length man. And ‘the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world