denied physical attributes, and believed in exposing their ideas to every one, it became necessary for them to deny direct- ion also. And having once denied direction they must also deny the Vision, for the thing seen must be in some direction to one who sees it. To prove their point they are constrained to set aside the traditional religion. They neglected the Traditions because they were only isolated things which should not be believed, if found opposed to the teachings of the Quran, that is, opposed to the verse, " The sight com- prehendeth Him not. " The Asharites tried to mix together the two beliefs, that is, the denial of physical attributes, and the possibility of vision of One having no body, by means of our senses. It became difficult for them to prove it, and they took refuge in many sophistical and conjectural arguments, that is arguments which are thought to be correct but are in reality wrong. It is so because it is possible to have the 13 194 AVERBQES 13 194 AVERBQES same grades in arguments as there are among men. Just as there may be found men with perfect excellence and those below them, till we may have a man who thinks himself learned and yet he is not, being only a pedant, so there are arguments which are extremely certain, and those below them, then, there are specious arguments, and those which though really false seem to be true. The statements of the Asharites in regard to this question are of two kinds: those refuting the arguments of the Mutazilites, and those proving the possibility of the Vision of One having no body, and that there is no difficulty in our believing it. The statements by which they have opposed the Mutazilites in their argument, that the thing seen must have a direction for one who sees it, is that some of them say that it is applied only to the visible, and not to the invisible, world; and that it is not one of those cases in which th condition of the one qan be RELTGTON AND PHILOSOPHY 195 applied to the other. According to them it is possible for a man to see an object having no direction, for he sees by his power of sight only that which comes before his eyes. In this they have mixed together the senses of sight with intelligence, for the latter can perceive that which has no direction, that is, no space; but for the perception of the eye there is a condition, that the thing to be perceived be in a direction, not only that but a particular direction too. So if we take the eye to be endowed with the power of seeing, then it is not pos- sible except under very limited condi- tions. These are three in number-light, the intervention of a transparent body between the eye and the object seen, and the possession of necessary colours by the object. A refutation of these conditions in the eyes is also a refuta- tion of those primary principles of knowledge which are known to all. It would be a refutation of the sciences of philosophy and mathematics. The Asha- 196 AVERR0ES 196 AVERR0ES rites also maintain that one of the con- ditions as we have said, for example, is that every rational being has a life, ib being apparent in the visible world as a condition for knowledge. Hence we say to them that these are also condi- tions for seeing things in the visible world. So according to their own prin- ciple is the case of the visible and the invisible. In his book Al Maqasid Abu Hamid ( Al Ghazzali ) intended to op- pose the premise that every object per- ceivable must be in some direction to the one seeing it. He says that a man sees himself reflected in a mirror and sees himself not in any other direction but the opposite one. Hence he can see his self in an opposite direction too. But this is a mistake, because what he sees is not his self but only an image of it. This image is in the opposite direction, being in the mirror, placed there.
Of the arguments which they advance to prove the vision of an object having RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY 197 no body, two are famous ones. Of these the more famous is one which says that an object seen is either because it has some colour, or because it has a body, or it is a colour, or because it is existent. Sometimes they mention many other causes than really do exist. They say that it is wrong to suppose that it must be a body, otherwise, no colour would be visible, it being also incorrect to suppose the spice to be the colour. Now when all the kinds of sup- positions in the premise have been refut- ed we shall have to believe that only an existent object will be seen. The mistake in this statement is quite clear. For an object is visible because of it- self. This is the case with the colour and the body: the colour being visible by itself, and the body through the colour. That is why a thing which has no colour cannot be seen. Had the existence of a thing been the only con- dition of visibility, it would have been possible to see the sound and the senses.
198 AVERR0ES 198 AVERR0ES In that case seeing, hearing, in fact all the five senses would have been only one, which is quite contrary to our reason. This problem and others like it have obliged the Mutakallimun to admit that it is possible to hear the colour, and see the sounds. But this is against nature, as man has understood it to be. For it is absolutely evident that the sense of seeing is quite different from that of hearing. Their actions are quite distinct from one another, and the organ of the one cannot work as the organ of the other. It is just as imposible to turn hearing as to turn colour into sound. Those who say that sometimes sound can be seen, should be asked to define the sense of seeing. They would necessarily answer that it is a faculty which perceives those things which can be seen, such as colour and so on. Then the}^ should be asked to define the sense of hearing, They would surely say that it is one sense by which sounds can be heard. Then they should be RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY li)9 cc.sked whether at the time of sound it is the sense of hearing only or seeing too. If they say that it is hearing only, they admit that it cannot perceive colours. If they say that it is seeing only, then it cannot hear sounds. If it is neither alone, for it perceives colours, then it is seeing and hearing both. But in this way everything can be proved to be one, even in the case of contradic- tory things. This is a thing which our Mutakallimun admit or they are com- pelled to do so. But it is clear that it is a philosophical opinion which is only fit for those ancient people famous for it. Now the second method which Mu- takallimun have adopted for proving the possibility of Divine Vision is that which has been mentioned by Abul Maali in his book, Al Irshad. It says that the senses can only feel the sub- stance ( Zat ) of things, but that which separates the existent thing from one another is not to be found in the sub- stance only. So the senses cannot per- 200 AVERROES 200 AVERROES ceive the substance, which is common to all the existent things. They can only perceive a thing because it exists. But all this is absurd, which is quite clear from the fact that if sight were only able to perceive things then it Would not have been possible for it to differentiate between white and black, for there is no difference between things about those qualities which are common to all. This also becomes impossible as regards all the other senses. The sense of seeing could not perceive different kinds of colours; the sense of hearing cannot differentiate between tastes. It would be necessary that the objects per- ceived by the senses be all of a kind, and there should be no difference between objects perceived by seeing and appre- hended by hearing. This is contrary to that which man commonly understands. In reality the senses perceive the sub- stance of things by the power which is vouchsafed to them. The cause of this mistake lies in the fact that that which RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY 201 perceives a substance, is thought to be the thing perceived. Had there not been said so much about these things, and so much respect for those who said it, it would not have satisfied anybody with a strong common sense.
The cause of such a perplexing situat- ion in the Law, which has compelled its votaries to take refuge in such worthless arguments, as would bring a smile to the lips of anybody who has made the least effort to distinguish between different kinds of arguments, is the exposition of anthropomorphic quali- ties of God to the common people, a fact which has been prohibited by God and His Prophet, It is so because it is very difficult for a man to believe at the same time that there exists One without a body, who can be seen with our eyes. For the things which the senses comprehend are in the bodies or the bodies themselves. Hence the Mutakallimun have tried to prove that the Divine Vision will be an addition to * 202 AVERROES * 202 AVERROES our existing qualities at that moment. This also should not have been disclosed to the common people. For since their intellect cannot go beyond their imagi- [ nation that which they cannot imagine is non-existent for them. To imagine a thing which has no body is not possible, and hence a belief in the existence of an object which they cannot imagine, is impossible for them. It was for this reason that the Law refused to disclose this secret to them, and described God, for their sake, in terms which they can imagine, ascribing to him the attributes of hearing, seeing, having a face, &c. &c, at the same time telling them that He is not like anything which can be imagined. Had the intention of the Law been to make clear to the masses the fact of His having no body, it would not have mentioned these things in detail. But as light was the highest of imaginable things, it was given to them as an illustration of God, for it is the best known of the things both to RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY 203 the senses and to the imagination.
Such is also the case in respect to the possibility of their understanding the things of the Day of Judgment. These have also been mentioned in terms which they can imagine. So now when the Law has adopted this course about the appar- ent description of God, there arises no doubt about him. For when it is said that He is Light or that there is a curtain of light upon Him, as is men- tioned in the Quran and authentic Traditions, and when it is said that the Faithful will see Him on the Day of Judgment as they see the sun, there arises no doubt or suspicion out of it for the common or the learned people. It is so becnuse to the learned it is quite clear that that condition will be an addition to our former knowledge. But when this is disclosed to the com- mon people, they cannot understand it, and hence they either disbelieve the whole of the Law, or consider its ex- ponent to be an infidel. So one who 20i AVERR0ES 20i AVERR0ES adopts a method other than that laid down by the Law in this respect, cer- tainly goes astray. If you look a little intently it will become clear to you, that in spite of the fact that the Law has not given illustration of those things for the common people, beyond which their imagination cannot go, it has also informed the learned men of the under- lying meanings of those illustrations. So it is necessary to bear in mind the limits which the Law has set about the instruction of every class of men, and not to mix them together. For in this manner the purpose of the Law is multiplied. Hence it is that the Pro- phet has said, "We, the prophets, have been commanded to adapt ourselves to the conditions of the people, and address them according to their intelligence." He who tries to instruct all the people in the matter of religion, in one and the same way, is like a man who wants to make them alike in actions too, which is quite against apparent laws and reason.
RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY 205 From the foregoing it must have become clear to you that the divine vision has an exoteric meaning in which there is no doubt, if we take the words of the Quran about God as they stand, that is, without proving or disproving the anthropomorphic attribute of God. Now since the first part of the Law has been made quite clear as to God's purity, and the quantity of the teaching fit for the common people, it is time to begin the discussion about the actions of God, after which our purpose in writing this tractate will be over.
OF THE ACTIONS OF GOD .In this section we will take up five questions, around which all others in this connection revolve. In the first place a proof of the creation of the universe; secondly, the advent of the prophets; thirdly, predestination and fate; fourthly, Divine justice and injustice; and fifthly, the Day of Judgment.
First Problem: the Creation of the 203 AVERROES Universe: — The Law teaches that the universe was invented and created by God, and that it did not come into being by chance or by itself. The meth- od adopted by the Law for proving this is not the one upon which the Asharites have depended. For we have already shown that those methods are not specially certain for the learned, nor common enough to satisfy all the classes of men. The methods which are really serviceable are those which have a very few premises, and the results of which fall very near to the commonly known ideas. But in instructing the common people the Law does not favour state- ments composed of long and complete reasonings, based upon different problems. So everyone who, in teaching them, adopts a different course, and interprets the Law according to it, has lost sight of its purpose and gone astray from the true path. And so also, the Law in giving illustrations for its reasonings uses only those which are present before us.
RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY 207 Whatever has been thought necessary for the common people to know, has been explained to them by the nearest available examples, as in the case of the Day of Judgment. But whatever was unnecessary for them to know, they have been told that it was beyond their know* ledge, as' the words of God about the Soul.07 Now that we have established this, it is necessary that the method adopted by the Law for teaching the creation of the universe to the common people be such as would be acknowledged by all. It is also necessary that since there cannot be found anything present to illustrate the creation of the universe the Law must have used the examples of the creation of things in the visible world.
So the method adopted by Law is that the universe was made by God. If we look intently into the verse per- 67. They will ask the concerning the Soul: answer, The Soul was created at the command of my Lord; but ye haw no knowledge given unto you, excep a little,— ( Quran xxii, 85.)
208 AVERROES taining to this subject we shall see that the method adopted is that of divine solici- tude, which we know to be one of those which prove the existence of God. When a man sees a thing made in a certain shape, proportion and fashion, for a particular advantage is derived from it, and purpose which is to be attained, so that it becomes clear to him, that had it not been found in that shape, and proportion, then that advantage would have been wanting in it, he comes to know for certain that there is a maker of that thing, and that he had made it in that shape and proportion, for a set purpose. For it is not possible that all those qualities serving that purpose be collected in that thing by chance alone. For instance, if a man sees a stone on the ground in a shape fit for sitting, and finds its proportions and fashion of the same kind, then he would come to know that it was made by a maker, and that he had made it and placed it there. But when he sees nothing in it* RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHV 209 which may have made it fit for sitting then he becomes certain that its ex* istence in the place was by chance only, without its being fashioned by any maker. Such is also the case with the whole of the universe. For when a man sees the sun, the moon, and all the stars, which are the cause of the four seasons, of days and nights, of rain, water and winds, of the inhabitation of the parts of the earth, of the existence of man, and of the being of all the animals and the plants and of the earth bein£ fit for the habitation of a man, and other animals living on it; and the water fit for the animals living in it; and the air fit for birds, and if there be anything amiss in this creat- ion and edifice, the whole world would come to confusion and disorder, then he would come to know with certainty that it is not possible that this harmony in it for the different members of the universe — man, animals, and plants — be found by chance only. He will 210 AVERROES 210 AVERROES know that there is one who determined it, and so one who made it by intention, and that is God, exalted and magnified may He be. He would know with certainty that the universe is a created thing, for he would necessarily think that it is not possible that in it should be found all this harmony, if it be not made by some one, and had come into existence by chance alone. This kind of argument is quite definite and at the same time clear, and some have men- tioned it here. It is based upon two principles which are acknowledged by all. One of them being, that the uni- verse, with all its component parts, is found fit for the existence of man and things: second! v, that which is found suitable in all its parts, for a single purpose, leading to a single goal, is necessarily a created thing. So those two principles lead us naturally to admit that the universe is a created thing, and that there is a maker of it. Hence " the argument of analogy * leads to two RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY 211 things at one and the same time, and that is why it is the best argument for proving the existence of God. This kind of reasoning is also found in the Quran in many verses in which the creation of the universe is mentioned. For instance, " Have We not made the earth a bed, and the mountains for shelter to fix the same? And have We not created you of two sexes; and appointed your sleep for rest and made the night a garment to cover you, and destined the day to a gaining of a liveli- hood; and built over you seven heavens, and placed therein a burning lamp? And do We not send down from the clouds pressing forth rain, water pouring down in abundance, that We may hereby produoe corn and herbs, and gardens planted thick with trees/'68 If we ponder over this verse it would be found that our attention has been called to the suitability of the different parts of the universe for the existence of man. In 68. Quran Uxvii. 3. et. seq.
212 AVERROES the very beginning we are informed of a fact well-known to all — and that is that the earth has been created in a way which has made it suitable for our existence. Had it been unstable, or of any other shape, or in any other place, or not of the present proportion, it would not have been possible to be here, or at all created on it. All this is included in the words, " Have We not made the earth a bed for you"? for in a bed are collected together all the qualities of shape, tranquility, and peace, to which may be added those of smooth- ness and softness. So how strange is this wonderful work and how excellent this blessedness, and how wonderful this collection of all the qualities! This is so because in the word mihad (bed) are brought together all those qualities, which are found in the earth, rendering it suitable for the existence of man. It is a thing which becomes clear to the learned after much learning and a long time, " But God will appropriate His RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY 213 mercy unto whom He pleaseth."69 Then as to the divine words, "And the mountains for stakes," — they tell us of the advantage to be found in the tran- quility of the earth on account of the mountains. For had the earth been created smaller than it is now, that is, without mountains it would have been quivered by the motion of other ele- ments, the water and the air, and would have been shaken and thus dis- placed. This would naturally have been the cause of the destruction of the animal world. So when its tranquility is in harmony with those living on it, it did not come into being by chance alone, but was made by some one's intention, and determination. Certainly it was 'made by One who intended it, and determined it, for the sake of those living on it. Then He calls our atten- tion to the suitability of the existence of night and day for animals. He says, " And made the night 69. Quran ii, 99.
214 AVERR0ES a garment to cover you; and destined the day to a gaining of your livelihood." He means to say that He has made the night like a covering and clothing for all the things, from the heat of the sun. For had there been no setting of the sun at night, all the things, whose life has been made dependent upon the sun, would have perished - that is, the animals and the plants. As clothing protects the people from the heat of the sun, in addition to its being a cover- ing, so God likened the night to it. This is one of the most beautiful of the metaphors. There is also another advan- tage in the night for the animals: their sleep in it is very deep, after the setting of the sun, which keeps faculties in motion, that is, wide awake. So God has said, ' And appointed your sleep for rest, " on account of the darkness of the night. Then He says, " And built over you seven heavens, and placed therein a burning lamp. " Here by the word building He means their creation, fcfcLIGION AND PHILOSOPHY 215 and their harmony with the created things, and their arrangement and system. By strength He means that power of revolution and motion which is never slackened, and never overtaken by fatigue; and they never fall like other roofs and high edifices. To this refer the words of God, " And made the heaven a roof well-supported. "70 By all this He shows their fitness in number, shape, fashion, and movement, for the existence of those who live on the earth round it. Were one of the heavenly bodies, not to speak of all, to stop for a moment all would be chaos on the face of the earth. Some people think the blast of the last trumpet, which will be the cause of the thunder- bolt, will be nothing but a stop in the revolution of the heavenly bodies. Then He tells us of the advantage of the sun for those living on the earth and says, " And placed therein a burning lamp. He calls it a lamp because in reality it 70. Quran xxi, 33.
216 AVERROES is all darkness, and light covers the * © darkness of the night, and if there be no lamp, man can get no advantage out of his sense of sight at night time: and © © in the same way if there were no sun the animals can have no benefit of their sense of seeing. He calls our attention to this advantage of the sun, ignoring © * © © others because it is the noblest of all the advantages and the most apparent of all. Then He tells us of His kind- ness in sending down rain, for the sake of the plants and the animals. The coming down of rain in an appointed proportion, and at an appointed season, for the cultivated fields cannot be by chance alone, but is the result of divine solicitude for us all. So He says, "And do We not send down from the clouds pressing forth rain, water pouring down in abundance that We may hereby pro- duce corn and herbs, and gardens plant- ed thick with trees, " There are many verses of the Quran on this subject. For instance, He says, " Do ye not see RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY 217 how God hath created the seven heavens, one above another, and hath placed the moon therein for a light, and hath appoint- ed the sun for a taper? God hath also provided and caused you to bring forth corn from the earth. "71 If we were to count all such verses and com- ment upon them showing the kindness of the Creator for the created, it would take too many volumes. We do not in- tend to do it in this book. If God should grant us life and leisure we shall write a book to show the kindness of God to which He has called our attention. It should be known that this kind of argument is just contrary to that which the Asharites think leads to the knowledge of God. They think that the creation does not lead us to the know- ledge of God through any of His good- ness, but through possibility, that is, the possibility which is found in all things, which we can understand to be of his shape oi' of quite a contrary one. But 71. Quran Ixxi, M-16.
218 AVERR0ES if this possibility be found alike in both the oases, then there is no wisdom in the creation of the universe, and there is found no harmony between man and the parts of it. For, as they think, if it is possible for the things to have any other form than they have now, then there can exist no harmony between man and other existent things by the creation of which God has obliged man and commanded him to be thankful to Him. This opinion, by which the creat- ion of man, as a part of the universe, is just as possible, for instance, as his creation in the void, is like the opinion of those who say that man exists but he could have been created in quite a different shape, and yet could perform actions like a man. According: to them it is also possible that he may have formed the part of another universe quite different from the existing one. In that case the blessing of the universe can have no obligation for man, for they are not necessary for his purpose.
RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY 219 Hence man is quite careless of them and they of him. So their existence is no blessing to him. This is all against the nature of man.
On the whole, a man who denies the existence of the effects arranged accord- ing to the causes in the question of arts, or whose wisdom cannot understand it, then he has no knowledge of the art of its Maker. So also a man who denies the existence of an order of effects in accordance with causes in this universe, denies the existence of the Creator altogether. Their saying that God is above these causes, and that they cannot have any bearing on the effects by His command, is very far from the true nature of philosophy, nay, it is a destroyer of it. For if it is possible to have the same effects with other than the prescribed causes just in the same degree as by them, then where is the greatness in producing the effects from the known Causes? It is so beeause the effects from the causes have one of 220 AVERROES 220 AVERROES the following three reasons. Either the existence of the causes will be in place of the effects b}^ compulsion, as a man's taking his food; or their being more perfect that is, the effect becoming better and more perfect through them, as a man's having two eyes, or they may have neither a better nor a more com- pulsive effect. In this case the existence of the effect and the cause would be by chance, without any intention at all; and hence, there would be no greatness found in it. For instance, if the shape of human hand, the number of the fingers, and their length be neither necessary nor adding any perfection in its work in seizing things of different kind, then the actions of the hand from this shape, and number of parts, would be by chance alone. If it be so, then it makes no difference whether a man is given a hand or a hoof, or something else, like the different animals, for their particular actions. On the whole, if we ignore the causes and their effects, then RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY 221 there remains nothing to refute the arguments of those who believe in the creation of the universe by chance alone, that is, those who say that there is no Creator at all, and that which has come into being in this universe is the result of material causes. For taking one of the two alternatives it is not more possible that it may have happened by chance, than done by an independent Actor. So when the Asharites say that the existence of one or more possibilities shows that there is a particular Maker of these things, they can answer and say that the existence of things by one of these possibilities was by chance alone, for intention works as one of the causes, and that which happens without any means or cause is by chance. We see that many things come into being in this way. For example, the elements mix together by chance, and then by this unintentional mixing there is pro- duced a new thing. They mix "gain, and this quite unintentionally produces 222 AVBRROES quite a new thing. In this way every kind of creation may be said to have come into existence by chance.
We say that it is necessary that there be found order and arrangement, the more perfect and finished than what can be imagined. This mixing together of elements is limited and pre-arranged, and things produced by them are sure to happen, and no disorder has ever happened in them. But all this could not happen by chance alone, for that which happens in this way by chance is of the least value. It is to this that God refers, u It is the work of the Lord, who has rightly disposed all things. ";2 I would like to know what completeness can be found in things made by chance, for such things are by no means better than their opposites. To this God refers in the following words, " Thou canst not see in the Creation of the most Merciful any unfit- ness or disproportion. Lift thy eyes 72. Quran xxvii, 90.
RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY 223