ceived the slightest traces of what we call the natural landed interest of the country.
We know that the British house of commons, without shutting its doors to any merit in any class, is, by the sure operation of adequate causes, rilled With every tiling illustrious in rank, in descent, in hereditary and in acquired opulence, in cultivated talents, in military, civil, naval, and politic distinction, that the country can afford. But supposing, what hardly can be supposed as a case, that the house oi commons should be composed in the same manner with the Tiers JEtat in France, would this dominion of chicane be borne with patience, or even conceived without horror? God forbid I should insinuate' any thing derogatory to that profession, which is another priesthood, administering the rites of sacred justice. But whilst I revere men in the functions which he- long to them, and would do as much as one man can do to prevent their exclusion from any, I cannot, to natter them, give the lie to nature. They are good and useful in the composition: they must be mischievous if they preponderate so as virtually to become the whole. Their very excellence in their peculiar functions may be far from a qualification for others. It cannot escape observation, that when men are too much confined to professional and faculty haMtS, and, as it were, inveterate in the recurrent employment of that narrow circle, they are rather disabled than qualified for whatever depends on the know ledge of mankind, on experience in mixed affairs, on a comprehensive, connected view of the various complicated external and internal interests which go to the formation of that multifarious thing called a state./ fit** REVOLUTION IN FRANCE. 59 After all, if the house of commons were to have a wholly professional and faculty composition, what is the power of the house of commons, circum- scribed and shut in by the immoveable barriers of laws, usages, positive rules of doctrine and practice, counterpoised by the house of lords, and every mo- ment of its existence at the discretion of the crown to continue, prorogue, or dissolve us? The power of the house of commons, direct or indirect, is indeed great; and long may it be able to preserve its great- ness, and the spirit belonging to true greatness, at the full; and it will do so as long as it can keep the breakers of law in India from becoming the makers of law for England. The power, however, of the house of commons, when least diminished, is as a drop of water in the ocean, compared to that residing in a settled majority of your National Assembly. That Assembly, since the destruction of the orders, has no funda- mental law, no strict convention, no respected usage to restrain it. Instead of finding themselves obliged to conform to a fixed constitution, they have a power to make a constitution which shall conform to their designs. Nothing in heaven or upon earth can serve as a control on them. What ought to be the heads, the hearts, the dispositions, that are qualified, or that dare, not only to make laws under a fixed constitu- tion, but at one heat to strike out a totally new constitution for a great kingdom, and in every part of it, from the monarch on the throne to the vestry of a parish? But — ''fools rush in where angels fear to tread." In such a state of unbounded power, for undefined and undefinable purposes, the evil of a moral and almost physical inaptitude of the man to 60 REFLECTIONS OX THE the function, must be the greatest we can conceive to happen in the management of human affairs.
Having considered the composition of the third estate as it stood in its original frame, I took a view of the representatives of the clergy. There too it appeared, that full as little regard was had to the general security of property, or to the aptitude of the deputies for their public purposes, in the principles of their election. That election was so contrived as to send a very large proportion of mere country curates to the great and arduous work of new- modelling a state; men who never had seen the state so much as in a picture; men who knew nothing of the world beyond the bounds of an obscure village; who, immersed in hopeless poverty, could regard all property, whether secular or ecclesiastical, with no other eye than that of envy; among whom must be many who, for the smallest hope of the meanest dividend in plunder, would readily join in any at- tempts upon a body of wealth, in which they could hardly look to have any share except in a general scramble. Instead of balancing the power of the active chicaners in the other assembly, these curates must necessarily become the active coadjutors, or at best the passive instruments, of those by whom they had been habitually guided in their petty village concerns. They too could hardly be the most conscientious of their kind, who, presuming upon their incompetent understanding, could intrigue for a trust which led them from their natural relation to their flocks, and their natural spheres of action, to under- take the regeneration of kingdoms. This preponde- rating weight being added to the force of the body <•!
REVOLUTION IN FRANCE. 61 chicane in the Tiers JStat, completed that momentum of ignorance, rashness, presumption, and lust of plunder, which nothing has been able to resist.
To observing men it must have appeared from the beginning, that the majority of the third estate, in conjunction with such a deputation from the clergy as I have described, whilst it pursued the destruction of the nobility, would inevitably become subservient to the worst designs of individuals in that class. In the spoil and humiliation of their own order these individuals would possess a sure fund for the pay of their new followers. To squander away the objects which made the happiness of their fellows, would be to them no sacrifice at all. Turbulent, discontented men of quality, in proportion as they are puffed up with personal pride and arrogance, generally despise their own order. One of the first symptoms they discover of a selfish and mischievous ambition, is a profligate disregard of a dignity which they partake with others. To be attached to the subdivision, to love the little platoon we belong to in society, is the first principle (the germ as it were) of public affections. It is the first link in the series by which we proceed towards a love to our country and to mankind. The interest of that portion of social arrangement is a trust in the hands of all those who compose it; and as none but bad men would justify it in abuse, none but traitors would barter it away for their own personal advantage.
There were, in the time of our civil troubles in England, (I do not know whether you have any such in your Assembly in France,) several persons, like the then Earl of Holland, who, by themselves or (>•> REFLECTIONS OK THE their families, had brought an odium on the throne, by the prodigal dispensation of its bounties towards them, who afterwards joined iii the rebellions arising from the discontents of which they were themselves the cause; men who helped to subvert that throne to which they owed, some of them their existence, others all that power which they employed to ruin their benefactor. If any bounds are set to the rapacious demands of that sort of people, or that others are permitted to partake in the objects tiny would engross, revenge and envy soon till up the craving void that is left in their avarice. Confounded by the complication of distempered passions, their reason is disturbed; their views become vast and perplexed; to others inexplicable — to themselves uncertain. They find, on all sides, bounds to their unprincipled ambition in any fixed order of things. But in the fog and haze of confusion all is enlarged, and appears without any limit.
When men of rank sacrifice all ideas of dignity to an ambition without a distinct object, ami work with low instruments and for low ends, the whole com- position becomes low and base. Does not something like this now appear in France? Does it not produce something ignoble and inglorious? a kind of mean- ness in all the prevalent policy? a tendency in ail that is done to lower along with individuals all the dignity and importance of the state? Other re- volutions have been conducted by persons, who, whilst they attempted or effected changes in the commonwealth, sanctified their ambition by advanc- ing the dignity of the people whose peace they troubled. They had long views. They aimed at REVOLUTION IN FftANCE. 63 the rule, not at the destruction of their country. They were men of great civil, and great military talents; and if the terror, the ornament of their age. They were not like Jew brokers contending with each other who could best remedy, with fraudulent circulation and depreciated paper, the wretchedness and ruin brought on their country by their degenerate councils. The.compliment made to one of the great bad men of the old stamp (Cromwell) by his kinsman, a favourite poet of that time, shews what it was he proposed, and what indeed to a great degree he accomplished in the success of his ambition: '• Still as you rise, the stale, exalted too, Finds no distemper whilst' tis chang'd by you; Chang'd like the world's great scene, when without noise The rising sun night's vulgar lights destroys.''
These disturbers were not so much like men usurping power, as asserting their natural place in society. Their rising was to illuminate and beautify the world. Their conquest over their competitors was by outshining them. The hand that, like a destroying angel, smote the country, communicated to it the force and energy under which it suffered. I do not say (God forbid) — I do not say that the virtues of such men were to be taken as a balance to their crimes; but they were some corrective to their effects. Such was, as I said, our Cromwell. Such were your whole race of Guises, Condes, and Colignis. Such the Richelieus, who in more quiet times acted in the spirit of a civil war. Such, as better men, and in a less dubious cause, were your Henry the Fourth and your Sully, though nursed in civil confusions, and not wholly without some of their. taint. It is a thing to be wondered at. to how very soon France, when she bad a moment to respire, recovered and emerged from the longest and most dreadful civil war that ever was known in any nation. Why'.- Because, among all their massacres, they had not slain the mind in their country. A conscious dignity, a noble pride, a generous of glory and emulation, was not extinguished. On the contrary, it was kindled and inflamed. The organs also of the state, however shattered, existed. All the prizes of honour* and virtue, all the rewards, all the distinctions, remained. But your present con- fusion, like a palsy, has attacked the fountain of life itself. Every person in your country, in a situation to be actuated by a principle of honour, is disgraced and degraded, and can entertain no sensation of life, except in a mortified and humiliated indignation. But this generation will quickly pass away. The next generation of the nobility will resemble the artificers, and clowns, and money-jobbers, usurers, and.lews, who will be always their fellows, some- times their masters. Believe me, Sir, those who attempt to level, never equalize. In all societies consisting of various descriptions of citizens, some description must be uppermost. The levellers therefore only change and pervert the natural order of things; they load the edifice of society, by setting up in the air what the solidity of the structure requires to be on the ground. The associations of tailor- and carpenters, of which the republic (of Paris, lor instance) is composed, cannot be equal to the situation, into which, by tie1 worst of usurpations.
REVOLUTION IN FRANCE. G.J an usurpation on the prerogatives of nature, you attempt to force them.
The chancellor of France, at the opening of the states, said, in a tone of oratorial flourish, that all occupations were honourable. If he meant only, that no honest employment was disgraceful, he would not have gone beyond the truth. But in asserting that any thing is honourable, we imply some distinction in its favour. The occupation of a hair-dresser, or of a working tallow-chandler, cannot be a matter of honour to any person — to say nothing of a number of other more servile employ- ments. Such descriptions of men ought not to suffer oppression from the state; but the state suffers oppression if such as they, either individually or collectively, are permitted to rule. In this you think you are combating prejudice, but you are at war with nature.* I do not, my dear Sir, conceive you to be of that sophistical, captious spirit, or of that uncandid dulness, as to require, for every general observation or sentiment, an explicit detail of the correctives * Ecclesiasticus, chap, xxxviii. verse 24. 2">. "The wisdom of a learned man cometh by opportunity of leisure: and he that hath little business shall become wise." — " How can he get wisdom that holdeth die plough, and that glorieth in the goad; that driveth oxen, and is occupied in their labours, and whose talk is of bullocks.'
Ver. 27. "So every carpenter and work-master that labourcth night and day," &c.
Ver.,'i.i. " They shall not be sought for in public counsel, nor sit high in the congregation: they shall not sit on the judges' seat, nor understand the sentence of judgment: they cannot declare justice and judgment, and they shall not be found where parables are spoken."
Ver. 34. " But they will maintain the state of the world."
I do not determine whether this book be canonical, as the Gallican church (till lately) lias considered it, or apocryphal, as here it is taken. I am sure it contains a great deal of sense and truth.
(if) ui'.l lie TIONS ON THE and exceptions which reason will presume to be included in all the general propositions which come from reasonable men. Vou do not imagine that I wish to confine power, authority, and distinction, to blood, and names, and titles. No, Sir. There is no qualification for government but virtue and wisdom, actual or presumptive. Wherever they are actually found, they have, in whatever state, con- dition, profession, o"r trade, the passport of heaven to human place and honour. Woe to the country which would madly and impiously reject the service of the talents and virtues, civil, military, or religious, that are given to grace and to serve it; and would condemn to obscurity every thing formed to diffuse lustre and glory around a state. Woe to that country too, that, passing into the opposite extreme, considers a low education, a mean contracted view of things, a sordid, mercenary occupation, as a pre- ferable title to command. Every thing ought to be open; but not indifferently to every man. No rotation, no appointment by lot, no mode of election operating in the spirit of sortition or rotation, can he generally good in a government conversant in extensive objects: because they have no tendency, direct or indirect, to select the man with a view to the duty, or to.accommodate the one to the other. I do not hesitate to say, that the road to eminence and power from obscure condition, ought not to be made too easy, nor a thing too much of course. If rare merit be the rarest of all rare tilings, it ought to pass through some sort of probation.
The temple of honour ought to lie seated on an eminence. If it he opened through virtue, let it he REVOLUTION IN FRANCE. 07 remembered too, that virtue is never tried but by some difficulty and some struggle.
Nothing is a due and adequate representation of a state, that does not represent its ability as well as its property. But as ability is a vigorous and active principle, and as property is sluggish, inert, and timid, it never can be safe from the invasions of ability, unless it be, out of all proportion, predominant in the representation. It must be represented too in great masses of accumulation, or it is not rightly protected. The characteristic essence of property, formed out of the combined principles of its acquisition and conservation, is to be unequal. The great masses therefore which excite envy, and tempt rapacity, must be put out of the possibility of danger. Then they form a natural rampart about the lesser properties in all their gradations. The same quantity of property which is, by the natural course, of things, divided among many, has not the same operation. Its defensive power is weakened as it is diffused. In this diffusion each man's portion is less than what, in the eagerness of his desires, he may flatter himself to obtain by dissipating the accumulations of others.' The plunder of the few would indeed give but a share inconceivably small in the distribution to the many. But the many are not capable of making tins calculation; and those who lead them to rapine, never intend this distribution.
The power of perpetuating our property in our families is one of the most valuable and interesting circumstances belonging to it, and that which tends the most to the perpetuation of society itself. The possessors of family wealth, and of the dis- 68 REFLECTIONS 01 68 REFLECTIONS 01 tmction which attends hereditary possession most concerned in it) are the natural securities for this transmission. With us. the house of peers is formed upon this principle. It is wholly composed of hereditary property and hereditary distinction, and made therefore the third of the legislature; and in the last event, the sole judge of all property in all its subdivisions. The house of commons too, though n<lt necessarily, yet, in fact, is always so composed in the far greater part. Let those large proprietors be what they will, (and they have their chance of being amongst the best,) tiny are at the very worst the ballast in the vessel of the common- wealth. Tor though hereditary wealth, and the rank which goes with it, are too much idolized by creeping sycophants, and the blind abject admirers of power, they are too rashly slighted in shallow speculations of the petulant, assuming, short-sighted coxcombs of philosophy. Some decent regulated preeminence, some preference (not exclusive appro- priation) given to birth, is neither unnatural, nor unjust, nor impolitic.
It is said, that twenty-four millions ought to prevail over two hundred thousand. True, if the constitution of a kingdom be a problem of arithmetic. This sort of discourse does well enough with the lamp-post for it- second: to men who may reason calmly, it is ridiculous. The will of the many, and their interest, must very often differ; and great will be the difference when they make an evil choice. A government of live hundred country attornies and obscure curates is not good for twenty-four millions of men, though it were chosen!<v eighl and REVOLUTION IX FRANCE. 69 forty millions; nor is it the better for being guided by a dozen of persons of quality, who have betrayed their trust in order to obtain that power. At present, you seem in every thing to have strayed out of the high road of nature. The property of France does not govern it. Of course property is destroyed, and rational liberty has no existence. All you have got for the present is a paper circulation, and a stock- jobbing constitution: and as to the future, do you seriously think that the territory of France, upon the republican system of eighty-three independent municipalities, (to say nothing of the parts that compose them,) can ever be governed as one body, or can ever be set in motion by the impulse of one mind? When the National Assembly has completed its work, it will have accomplished its ruin. These commonwealths will not long bear a state of sub- jection to the republic of Paris. They will not bear that this one body should monopolize the captivity of the king, and the dominion over the Assembly calling itself National. Each will keep its own portion of the spod of the church to itself; and it will not suffer either that spod, or the more just fruits of their industry, or the natural produce of their soil, to be sent to swell the insolence, or