sigillorum, &c. It is evident from the dedication that Bruno published this work in England, therefore between 1582 and 1585.—Jordanus Brunus De Lampade combinatoria Lulliana, Vitebergæ 1587. 8. In the same place he wrote De Progressu et lampade venatoria Logicorum, Anno 1587, which he dedicated to the Chancellor of the Wittenberg University.—Jordanus Brunus De Specierum scrutinio et lampade combinatoria Raym. Lullii, Pragæ, exc. Georg. Nigrinus 1588. 8; also printed in the works of Raymund Lullius.—Also De imaginum, signorum et idearum compositione Libri III.
Francofurti ap. Jo. Wechel. et Petr. Fischer. 1591. 8.
[82] Buhle: Geschichte der neuern Philos. Vol. II. Section II. p. 715 (717); Jordanus Brunus: De compendiosa architectura et complemento artis Lullii (Jordani Bruni Nolani scripta, quæ latine confecit, omnia. ed. A.
Fr. Gfrörer, Stuttgard, 1835, Fasc. II.), c. 1, p. 238.
[83] Buhle: Geschichte der neuern Philos. Vol. II. Section II. pp. 717, [84] Buhle: Gesch. d. neuern Philos. Vol. II. Section II. p. 717 (719, a); Jord. Brun. De compend. architect. c. 2, 3, pp. 238, 239.
[85] Buhle: Gesch. d. neuern Philos. Vol. II. Section II. pp. 723, 724; Jordani Bruni De Umbris idearum (Jord. Bruni Nolani scripta, ed. A. Fr.
Gfrörer, Fasc. II.): Triginta intentiones umbrarum, Intentio I-IV. pp.
300-302.
[86] Buhle: Gesch. d. neuern Philos. Vol. II. Section II. pp. 724-726; Jordanus Brunus: De Umbris idearum, Intentio V-IX. pp. 302-305.
[87] Buhle: Gesch. d. neuern Philos. Vol. II. Section II. pp. 727, 731; Jordanus Brunus: De Umbris idearum, Intentio XXI. p. 310; De triginta idearum conceptibus: Conceptus X. p. 319.
[88] Buhle: Gesch. d. neuern Philos. Vol. II. Section II. pp. 730-734; Jordani Bruni De Umbris idearum: De triginta idearum conceptibus, Conceptus VII. X. XIII. XXVI. pp. 318-320, 323, 324.
[89] Buhle: Gesch. d. neuern Philos. Vol. II. Section II. p. 745; Jordani Bruni Explicatio triginta sigillorum: Sigillus Sigillorum, P. II. § 11.
[90] Buhle: Gesch. d. neuern Philos. Vol. II. Section II. p. 734; cf.
Jordan. Brun. De Umbris Idearum: Ars Memoriæ, I.-XI. pp. 326-330.
[91] Buhle: Gesch. d. neuern Philos. Vol. II. Section II. pp. 734, 735; Jordan. Brun. De Umbris Idearum: Ars Memoriæ, XII. pp. 330, 331.
[92] Brucker. Hist. crit. phil. T. IV. P. II. pp. 671-677; Buhle: Gesch.
d. neuern Phil. Vol. II. Section II. pp. 866-869.
[93] Buhle: Lehrbuch. d. Gesch. d. Phil. Part VI. Section I. pp. 410-415; Brucker. Hist. crit. phil. T. IV. P. II. pp. 677-680; Buhle: Gesch. d.
neuern Philos. Vol. II. Section II. pp. 870-878.
[94] Buhle: Gesch. d. neuern Philos. Vol. II. Sec. II. pp. 670-680; Brucker. Hist. crit. phil. T. IV. P. II. pp. 548-562.
[95] Buhle: Gesch. d. neuern Philos. Vol. II. Section II. pp. 950-954; Brucker. Hist. crit. phil. T. IV. P. II. pp. 91-95.
[97] Bacon, De augmentis scientiarum, II. c. 1 (Lugd. Batavor, 1652. 12), pp. 108-110 (Operum omnium, pp. 43, 44, Lipsiæ, 1694) (Ellis and Spedding’s translation, Vol. IV. p. 394).
[100] Bacon. Novum Organon, L. I. Aphor. 11-34, pp. 280-282 (Operum).
Spedding’s translation. Vol. IV. p. 428.)
123).
[103] Bacon. Novum Organon, L. I. Aphor. 105, p. 313; De augmentis [104] The _Quarterly Review_, Vol. XVII., April, 1817, pp. 50, 51: cf.
Bacon silva silvarum sive historia naturalis, Cent. IV., Sect. 326, 327 (Operum, pp. 822, 823).
[107] The _Quarterly Review_, Vol. XVII., April, 1817, pp. 51, 52; cf.
Bacon. De augmentis scientiarum, III. c. 3, 4, pp. 200-206 (pp. 78-80).
[108] Bacon. Novum Organon, L. II. Aphor. 2. (Ellis and Spedding’s translation, Vol. IV. p. 119.)
[109] Bacon. Novum Organon, L. II. Aphor. 2; cf. the _Quarterly Review_, Vol. XVII. April, 1817, p. 52.
[113] Bacon. De augmentis scientiarum, III. c. 4, pp. 231-234 (pp. 89, 90).
[115] Bacon. Novum Organon, L. II. Aphor. 17, pp. 345, 346.
[116] Bacon. Novum Organon, L II Aphor. II pp. 325, 326 (Tennemann, Vol.
326.
[117] Bacon. Novum Organon, L II. Aphor. 35, p. 366.
[118] The _Quarterly Review_, Vol. XVII. April, 1817, p. 52. Cf. Bacon.
[119] Jacob Böhme’s Leben und Schriften (in his Works, Hamburg, 1715, 4), 57, pp. 27, 28.
[121] Jacob Böhme’s Leben und Schriften, No. VI. § 3-8, pp. 81-87; No. I.
§ 12-17, pp. 8-11.
[122] Theosophische Sendbriefe, 47th Letter (Werke, Hamburg, 1715, 4), p.
3879.
[123] Trostschrift von vier Complexionen, § 43-63, pp. 1602-1607.
[125] Von Christi Testament der heiligen Taufe, Book II. chap. i. § 4-5, pp. 2653, 2654.
[128] Von den drei Principien göttlichen Wesens, chap. x. § 42, p. 470.
[129] Von der Gnadenwahl, chap. i. § 3-10, pp. 2408-2410; chap. ii. § 9, pp. 49-51; chap. xi. § 47, pp. 126, 127, etc.
translation].
46, pp. 78-126.
[136] Von göttlicher Beschaulichkeit, chap. iii. § 1-3, pp. 1755, 1756.
[137] Morgenröthe, chap. iii. § 33-35, p. 44 (cf. Rixner: Handbuch d.
Gesch. d. Philos. Vol. II. Appendix, p. 106, § 7).
drei Principien göttlichen Wesens, chap. iv. § 69, p. 406; chap. xv. § 5, pp. 543, 544.
[140] Morgenröthe, chap. xiii. § 53-64, pp. 160-162; Vierzig Fragen von der Seele, XII. § 4, p. 1201; Von sechs theosophischen Puncten, V. 7, Von göttlicher Beschaulichkeit, chap. i. § 23-26, pp. 1742, 1743; Von der Geburt und Bezeichnung aller Wesen, chap. xvi. § 49, p. 2391; Vom [141] Von der Menschwerdung Jesu Christi, Pt. I. chap. v. § 14, p. 1323; Von den drei Principien göttlichen Wesens, chap. x. § 43, p. 470.
[142] Von göttlicher Beschaulichkeit, chap. iii. § 11, p. 1757.
[145] 177 Fragen von göttlicher Offenbarung, III. § 2-5, 10-16, pp.
3591-3595.
[146] Von göttlicher Beschaulichkeit, chap. iii. § 12, 14, pp. 1757, 1758.
[147] Rixner: Handbuch d. Gesch d. Philos. Vol. II. Appendix, p. 108, § 5 [148] Morgenröthe, chap. xxiii. § 11, 12, pp. 307, 308 (cf. Rixner: Handb. d. Gesch. d. Philos. Vol. II. Appendix, p. 108, § 5), [150] Von göttlicher Beschaulichkeit, chap. iii. § 13, p. 1758; translation].
Principien göttlichen Wesens, chap. viii § 5, p. 433, Mysterium Magnum, oder Erklarung des ersten Buchs Mosis, chap xix § 28, pp. 2830, 2831.
[153] Von göttlicher Beschaulichkeit, chap. i. § 23-39, pp. 1742-1746; [154] Brucker. Hist. crit. phil. T. IV. P. II. pp. 203-217; Cartes. De Methodo, I-II (Amstelod. 1672, 4), pp. 2-7 (Œuvres complètes de Descartes publiées par Victor Cousin, T. I.), pp. 125-133; Notes sur l’éloge de Descartes par Thomas (Œuvres de Descartes publiées par Cousin, T. I.), p.
83, et suiv.; Tennemann, Vol. X. pp. 210-216.
[155] Spinoza: Principia philosophiæ Cartesianæ (Benedicti de Spinoza 1, 2 (Œuvres, T. III. pp. 63-66); cf. Meditationes de prima philosophia, [158] Cartes. De Methodo, IV. pp. 20, 21 (p. 158); Spinoza: Principia philosophiæ Cartes, p. 14.
[160] Cartes. Responsiones ad sec. objectiones, adjunctæ Meditationibus de prima philosophia, p. 74 (p. 427); Spinoza: Principia philosophiæ Cartes., pp. 4, 5.
[161] Appendix ad Cartes. Meditationes, continens objectiones quint. p. 4 (Œuvres, T. II. pp. 92, 93).
[164] Cartes. Respons. ad sec. object.: Rationes more geometr. dispos., Postulata, p. 86 (pp. 454, 455); Spinoza: Principia philosophiæ, Cartes., p. 13.
Meditation. VI. p. 38 (pp. 329, 330); Spinoza: Principia philos. Cartes., pp. 2, 3.
[166] Cartes. Respons. ad sec. object.: Rat. more geom. dispos., Meditationes, II. pp. 9-14 (pp. 246-262).
[167] Cartes. De Methodo, IV. p. 21 (pp. 158, 159); Spinoza: Principia philosoph. Cartes., p. 14.
[169] Cartes. Respons. ad sec. object. Rationes more geom. dispos., Meditationes, III. pp. 15-17 (pp. 263-268).
Meditationes, III. pp. 17-25 (pp. 268-292); De Methodo, IV. pp. 21, 22 (pp. 159-162); Spinoza: Principia philos. Cartes., p. 10.
[172] Cartes. Resp. ad sec. obj.: Rat. more geom. disp., Ax. III.-VI., X., Prop. I. pp. 88, 89 (pp. 458-461); Spinoza: Princ. phil. Cart., pp.
14-17.
[173] Spinoza: Princip. philos. Cart., p. 20; Cartesii Resp. ad sec.
obj.: Rat. more geom. dispos., Propos. II. p. 89 (pp. 461, 462).
Meditationes, IV. pp. 25, 26 (pp. 293-297).
[177] In the Lectures of 1829-1830 the philosophy of Malebranche is inserted here. (Editor’s note).
Responsiones quartæ, p. 133 (p. 70); Spinoza: Princip. philos. Cart. pp.
30, 31, 36, 38; Buhle: Geschichte der neuern Philosophie, Vol. III. Sec.
I. pp. 17, 18.
[187] Buhle: Geschichte der neuern Philosophie, Vol. III. Sec. I. p. 19; 85-88).
[191] Cartes. De Methodo, V. pp. 35, 36 (pp. 185-189).
[193] Collectanea de vita B. de Spinoza (addita Operibus ed. Paulus Jenæ 1802-1803, T. II.), pp. 593-604, 612-628 (Spinoza Epist. LIII-LIV. in Oper. ed. Paul. T. I. pp. 638-640) 642-665; Spinozæ Oper. ed. Paul. T.
II. Præf. p. XVI.
[194] Collectanea de vita B. de Spinoza, pp. 629-641; Spinozæ Ethic.
(Oper. T. II.) pp. 1, 3 et not., 33.
[195] Spinoz. Ethices, P. I. Prop. V. VIII. X. et Schol., XIII. pp.
37-39, 41, 42, 45.
[196] Spinoz. Ethices, P. I. Prop. XIV. et Coroll. II. Prop. XV. XVI. et [197] Spinoz. Ethices, P. I. Prop. XVII., Coroll. I., II., et Schol, Prop. XVIII., Prop. XX, et Coroll. I. Prop. XXI., XXVI., XXVII., XXIX., [198] Spinoz. Ethices, P. II. Prop. I., II., VII. et Schol. pp. 78, 79, 82, 83.
III. p. 132; Prop. XI. Schol., p. 141.
[200] Spinoz. Ethices, P. II. Prop. XI. Demonst. et Coroll. pp. 86, 87; Defin. IV. pp. 77, 78.
[201] Dictionnaire historique et critique (édition de 1740, T. IV.), Article Spinosa, p. 261, Note N. No. IV.
[202] Spinoz. Ethices, P. II. Prop. XII., XIII. et Schol. Prop. XIV., [203] Spinoz. Ethices, P. II. Prop. XI. (Axiom I. p. 78) et Demonstr.
Prop. X. pp. 85-87; Prop. VI. p. 81; P. III. Prop. II. pp. 133, 134.
[204] Spinoz. Ethices, P. III. Prop. VI.-VIII. Prop. IX. Schol. pp. 139, 140; P. II. Prop. XLIX. Coroll. p. 123; P. III. Prop. II. Schol. p. 136; P. V. Prop. III. Demonst. et Coroll. pp. 272, 273.
Præf. p. 199; P. III. Prop. XI. Schol. pp. 141, 142; P. IV. Prop. II. p.
205; P. III. Prop. III. et Schol. p. 138.
[206] Spinoz. Ethices, P. V. Prop. XXXVI. Schol. Prop. XXXVII. Demonstr., Prop. XXXVIII. et Schol. pp. 293-295.
[207] Spinoz. Ethices, P. II. Prop. XL. Schol. II. pp. 113, 114.
[208] Spinoz. Ethices, P. II. Prop. XLIV. et Coroll. II. pp. 117, 118; [209] Spinoz. Ethices, P. V. Prop. XIV. p. 280; Prop. VI. p. 275; Prop.
XXVII. pp. 287, 288; Prop. XXXII. Coroll.; Prop. XXXV. pp. 291, 292.
[210] Buhle: Gesch. d. neuern Philosophie, Vol. III. Sec. 2, pp. 430, 431.
[211] Malebranche: De la recherche de la vérité (Paris, 1736), T. II.
chap. ii. pp. 66-68; chap. iii. p. 72; chap. iv. p. 84; chap. v. p. 92; chap. vi. pp. 95, 96.
[212] Malebranche: De la recherche de la vérité, T. II. L. III. Part II.
chap. vi. pp. 100-102.
[213] Malebranche: De la recherche de la vérité, T. II. L. III. P. II.
chap. vi. pp. 103-107, 109-111.
[214] Buhle: Geschichte der neuern Philosophie, Vol. IV. Sec. 1, pp.
238-241; Quarterly Review, April, 1817, pp. 70, 71; The Works of John Locke (London, 1812), Vol. I.: The Life of the Author, pp. xix.-xxxix.
[215] Locke: An Essay concerning human Understanding (The Works of John [216] Locke: An Essay concerning human Understanding (Vol. I) Book I.
[217] Locke: An Essay concerning human Understanding (Vol. I.) Bk. II.
chap. i. § 1, 2.
[218] Locke: An Essay concerning human Understanding (Vol. I.), Bk. II.
chap. i. § 2-5.
[220] Locke: An Essay concerning human Understanding (Vol I.), Bk. II., [221] Locke: An Essay concerning human Understanding (Vol. I), Bk. II.
chap. xiii. § 2; chap. iv. § 2.
[222] Ibidem (Vol. I.), Bk. II. chap. xiv. § 3.
[223] Locke: An Essay concerning human Understanding (Vol. II.), Bk. II.
[224] Ibidem (Vol. I.), Bk. II. chap. xxi. § 1.
[225] Ibidem (Vol. II.), Bk. II. chap. xxvi. § 1.
[226] Ibidem (Vol. I.), Bk. II. chap xxi. § 7.
[227] Ibidem (Vol. I.), Bk. II. chap. xiii. § 17, 18.
[228] Locke: An Essay concerning human Understanding (Vol. I.), Bk. II.
chap. viii. § 9-26.
[229] Locke: An Essay concerning human Understanding (Vol. II.), Bk. III.
[230] Brucker. Histor. critic. philos. T. IV. P. 2, pp. 731-736, 743-745.
[231] Hug. Grot. De jure belli ac pacis, B. III. chap. xi. § 13-16 (Ed.
[232] Buhle: Geschichte der neuern Philosophie, Vol. III. Sec. 1, pp.
223, 224, 227.
[233] Hobbes. Epistola dedicatoria ante Elementor philos Sectionem primam (Thomæ Hobbesii Opera philosophica, quæ latine scripsit omnia, Amstelod, [234] Cf. Brucker. Histor. crit. philos. T. IV. P. II. p. 154.
[235] Hobbes, De cive, chap. i. § 2, 3 (Oper. phil. etc. Amstel. 1668), pp. 3, 4.
[236] Hobbes, De cive, chap. i. § 4-6, 12-14, pp. 4-8; Leviathan, chap.
xiii. (Oper.), pp. 63-66.
[238] Buhle: Geschichte der neuern Philosophie, Vol. IV. Sec. 2, pp.
519-523; Rixner: Handbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie, Vol. III. p. 29.
[239] Rixner: Handbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie, Vol. III. p. 31; cf. Puffendorf. De jure naturæ et gent. II. 2, § 5-7 (Francof. ad Moenum, [240] Buhle: Geschichte der neuern Philosophie, Vol. IV. Sec. 1, pp. 107, 108.
[241] Buhle, Geschichte der neuern Philosophie, Vol. IV. p. 115, cf.
[242] La vie de Mr. Leibnitz par Mr. le Chevalier de Jaucourt (Essais de P. II. pp. 335-368; Leibnitzii Opera omnia (ed. Dutens), T. II., P. I.
pp. 45, 46.
[243] Vie de Mr. Leibnitz, pp. 134-143; Brucker. Hist. crit. philos. T.
IV. P. II. pp. 385, 389; Tennemann, vol. xi. pp. 181, 182.
[245] Ibidem, Principia philosophiæ, pp. 20-31.
[247] Leibnitz, Principes de la nature et la grace § 1, p. 32.
(Recueil de diverses pieces par Des Maiseaux, T. II. p. 485, Principia [248] Leibnitzii De ipsa natura sive de vi insita actionibusque 3-6, 18, pp. 20-22; Principes de la nature et de la grace, § 2, p. 32.
éclaircissement du système de la communication des substances (Oper. T.
pp. 128, 129, § 4, 5: Il n’y a point deux individus indiscernables. Un gentilhomme d’esprit de mes amis, en parlant avec moi en présence de Mad.
l’Electrice dans le jardin de Herrenhausen, crut qu’il trouverait bien deux feuilles entièrement semblables. Mad. l’Electrice l’en défia, et il courut longtemps en vain pour en chercher. Deux gouttes d’eau ou de lait regardées par le microscope se trouveront discernables. C’est un argument contre les Atomes (Recueil, T. I. p. 50).—Cf. Hegel’s Werke, Vol. IV. p.
45.
[251] Leibnitzii Principia philosophiæ, § 10-16, pp. 21, 22; Principes de la nature et de la grace, § 2, p. 32.
[252] Leibnitzii Principia philosophiæ, § 19-23, pp. 22, 23; Principes de la nature et de la grace, § 4, pp. 33, 34; Nouveaux essais sur l’entendement humain (Œuvres philosophiques de Leibnitz par Raspe), Bk.
sive de vi insita, § 11, p. 55; Système nouveau de la nature et de la communication des substances (Op. T. II. P. I.), pp. 50, 53.
Nouveaux essais sur l’entendement humain, Bk. II. chap. xiii. § 15, 17, pp. 106, 107.
[256] Leibnitz: Nouveaux essais sur l’entendement humain, Bk. II. chap.
[257] Leibnitzii Oper. T. II. P. I. p. 39; Nouveaux essais sur [258] Leibnitzii Oper. T. II. P. II. p. 60; Nouveaux essais sur l’entendement humain, Bk. II. chap. xxiii. § 23, p. 181.
[259] Leibnitzii Principia philosophiæ, § 65-71, p. 28; Principes de la nature et de la grace, § 3, 4, pp. 32, 33.
[261] Leibnitz. Principes de la nature et de la grace, § 7, p. 35.
[262] Leibnitz: Principes de la nature et de la grace, § 8, p. 35; Principes de la nature et de la grace, § 10, p. 36.
[265] Leibnitzii Causa Dei asserta per justitiam ejus (Essais de [266] Leibnitz: Principes de la nature et de la grace, §3, p. 33; Premier élaircissement du système de la communication des substances, p. 70.
[267] Leibnitz: Second et troisième éclaircissements du système de la communication des substances, pp. 71-73.
[268] Leibnitzii Principia philosophiæ, § 82, p. 30; Principes de la nature et de la grace, § 11, p. 36.
[269] Leibnitz: Système nouveau de la nature et de la communication des substances, pp. 54, 55.
[270] Leibnitzii Principia philosophiæ, § 90, p. 31; Principes de la pp. 46, 47.
[274] Leibnitz: Principes de la nature et de la grace, § 12,13, pp. 36, [275] Leibnitz: Essais de Théodicée, T. II. P. III. § 291, pp. 184, 185; [276] Buhle: Geschichte der neuern Philosoph., Vol. IV. Sec. II., pp.
571-582; Tiedemann: Geist der speculativen Philos., Vol. VI. pp. 511-518; Rixner: Handbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie, Vol. III. § 79, pp. 195, 196.
[277] Wolf’s Vernünftige Gedanken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des [278] Wolff’s Anfangsgründe aller mathematischen Wissenschaften, Pt. I.: Anfangsgründe der Baukunst, Pt. II. Prop. 8, p. 414; Problem 22, pp. 452, 453; Pt. II.: Anfangsgründe der Fortification, Pt. I. p. 570.
[279] In the lectures of 1825-1826 and 1829-1830 Berkeley was passed over by Hegel; in both courses Hume follows directly after the Scottish and French philosophers, and thus comes immediately before Kant; in the course of 1825-1826 the French philosophy precedes the Scottish also.
[280] Nachrichten von dem Leben und den Schriften des Bischofs Berkeley (in Berkeley’s philosoph. Werk. Pt. I. Leipzig, 1781), pp. 1, 45, Buhle: Geschichte der neuern Philosophie, Vol. V Sect. 1, pp. 86-90.
[281] Buhle: Geschichte der neuern Philosophie, Vol V. pp. 90, 91; The Works of George Berkeley, Prof. Fraser’s edition (Dialogues between Hylas [282] Buhle, Geschichte der neuern Philosophie, Vol. V. Sect. 1, pp. 92, 93; The Works of George Berkeley, Vol. I. p. 279 _seq._ _seq._ [285] Buhle: Geschichte der neuern Philosophie, Vol. V. Sect. 1, pp. 91, 95; The Works of George Berkeley, Vol. I. pp. 308, 335.
passim_.
[288] Buhle: Geschichte der neuern Philosophie, Vol. V. Sect. 1, pp.
193-200.
[289] Tennemann’s Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie von Wendt (Leipzig, 1829), § 370, pp. 439, 440; Hume: Essays and Treatises on several subjects, Vol. III. containing an Inquiry concerning human Tennemann, Vol. XI pp. 433, 434.
[290] Hume: Essays and Treatises on several subjects, Vol III. Not. A, pp. 283, 284.
[291] Tennemann’s Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie von Wendt, § 370, p. 440; Hume, Essays and Treatises on several subjects, Vol. III.
Sect. 4, Pt. I. pp. 43-45; Sect. 5, pp. 66, 67; Buhle: Geschichte der neuern Philosophie, Vol. V. Sect. 1, pp. 204, 205; Tennemann, Vol. XI.
pp. 435, 436.
[292] Hume: Essays and Treatises on several subjects, Vol. III. Sect.
vii. Pt. 1, pp. 102, 103; Pt. 2, pp. 108, 109; Sect. viii. pp. 118, 119.
[293] Hume: Essays and Treatises on several subjects, Vol. IV. containing an Inquiry concerning the principles of morals, Sect. 1, p. 4; Appendix I. p. 170.
[294] Buhle: Geschichte der neuern Philosophie, Vol. V. Sect. 1, pp. 230, 231; cf. Hume, _ibidem_, Vol. III. Sect. 12, P. II. p. 221; Vol. IV.; An [295] Hume: Essays and Treatises on several subjects, Vol. III. Sect. 12, Pt. I. pp. 217, 218; Not. N. pp. 296, 297; Buhle: Geschichte der neuern [296] Tennemann’s Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie von Wendt, § 371, p. 442.
[297] Rixner: Handbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie, Vol. III. § 119, p. 259; cf. Thomas Reid; An Inquiry into the human mind on the principles of common sense (Edinburgh, 1810), chap. i. Sect. 4, pp. 19, 20 (translated into German, Leipzig, 1782, pp. 17, 18); chap. vi. Sect.
[298] Rixner: Handbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie, Vol. III. § 120, pp. 261, 262; cf. James Beattie: Essays on the nature and immutability of Truth, &c. (Edinburgh, 1772), Pt. I., chap, i., pp. 18-31 (translated into German, Copenhagen and Leipzig, 1772, pp. 24-42); chap. ii. Sect. 2, [299] Cf. James Oswald: An Appeal of common-sense in behalf of religion (Edinburgh, 1772), Vol. I. Book I. Introduction, p. 12 (translated by II. Book II. chap. i. pp. 50, 51 (pp. 54, 55).
[301] The name assumed by Abraham Tucker.—[Translator’s note.]
[302] Lectures of 1825-1826.
[303] Lectures of 1829-1830.
[304] Emile ou de l’éducation. T. II. (Paris, 1813, él. stéréotype), Book IV., Profession de foi du vicaire savoyard, p. 215 _seq._ [305] Buhle: Lehrbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie, Pt. VIII. pp. 62, 63: Système de la Nature par Mirabaud (Londres, 1770), T. I. chap. i. p.
[306] Buhle: Lehrbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie, Pt. VIII. pp. 63, 64. Système de la Nature, T. I. chap. ii. pp. 18, 16, 21, et 15.
[307] Buhle, _ibidem_, pp. 64, 65, 70; Système de la Nature, T. I. chap.
ii. pp. 30, 31; chap. iii. pp. 39, 40; chap. iv. pp. 45, 46; chap. vii.
pp. 90, 91.
[308] Robinet: De la Nature (Troisième édition, Amsterdam, 1766), T. I.
P. I. chap. iii. iv. pp. 16, 17.
[309] Robinet, De la Nature, T. I. P. II. chap. ii. pp. 156, 157; chap.
vii. pp. 166, 168; chap. ix.-xi.; chap. xv. pp. 202, 203, chap. xix. p.
217.
[310] Robinet: De la Nature, T. I. P. I. chap. xxviii. p. 138; chap.
xiii. p. 70.
[311] Helvetius: De l’esprit (Oeuvres complètes, T. II. Deux-Ponts, chap. iv. p. 90; chap. v. p. 91; chap. viii. p. 114; chap. xxiv. pp. 256, 257.
[312] Rousseau: Du contrat social (Lyon, 1790), Book I. chap. iii. pp. 8, [313] Sämmtliche Schriften, Vol. XXXIX. (Berlin u. Stettin, 1828), pp.
111, 112.
[314] Lessing’s Sämmtliche Schriften, Vol. XXIX. pp. 122, 123.
[315] Tenneman’s Grundriss von Wendt, § 406, p. 531; Rixner: Handbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie, Vol. III. § 145, p. 317; Jacobi’s Werke, Vol.
IV. Sec. 1, p. 3.
[316] Jacobi: Briefe über die Lehre des Spinoza (second edition, 1789), pp. 85, 86 (Werke, Vol. IV. Sec. 1, p. 110).
[317] Buhle: Lehrbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie, Part VIII. pp. 386, 387; Mendelssohn’s Morgenstunden (second edition, 1786), pp. 293-296.
[318] Jacobi: Briefe über die Lehre des Spinoza, IV. Prop. pp. 225, 223 (pp. 223, 216).
[321] Jacobi: Briefe über die Lehre des Spinoza, supplement vii. pp.
419-421, and note (Werke, Vol. IV. Sec. 2, pp. 149-151).
[322] Jacobi: Briefe über die Lehre des Spinoza, supplement vii. pp.
[324] Cf. Jacobi’s Werke, Vol. III. p. 277.
[325] Jacobi: Briefe über die Lehre des Spinoza, pp. 216, 217 (p. 211).
[326] Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft (sixth edition, Leipzig, 1818), pp. 4, 11, 13, 93.
[327] Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 3-5.
[328] Ibidem, Preface, pp. xviii., xix.
[329] Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 8, 9, 75, 77, 15.
[330] Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 255, 256.
[332] Ibidem, pp. 497, 498; Kritik der prakt. Vernunft (fourth edition, Riga, 1797), p. 254; Kritik der Urtheilskraft (third edition, Berlin, [333] Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 25-27.
[334] Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 29, 30; 34-36.
[336] Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 54, 55.
[338] Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 105-110.
[339] Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 129-132.
[341] In the lectures of 1825-1826 the philosophy of Fichte on its theoretic side is interpolated here, while its practical side is only shortly mentioned after an account is given of the Critique of Practical Reason.
[342] Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 257-259, 264, 267, 268, 273.
289.
[344] Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 289-299.
[345] Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 312-314.
[346] Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 317, 318, 328, 329, 332.
[349] Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 319, 354, 355.
[350] Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 497, 498.
[351] Here there is inserted in the lectures of 1825-1826 an examination of what the philosophy of Jacobi has to say on this point.
[352] Kant: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft (third edition, Leipzig, 1800), pp. 1, 27.
[353] Kant: Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blossen Vernunft (second edition, Königsberg, 1794), pp. 20-48.
[354] Kant: Kritik der prakt. Vernunft (fourth edition, Riga, 1797), pp.
3-11, 29-32.
77.
[356] Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, pp. 62, 500.
[357] Kant: Kritik d. prakt. Vernunft, pp. 54, 58 (35).
[358] Kant: Kritik d. prakt. Vernunft, pp. 223-227.
[360] Kant: Kritik der prakt. Vernunft, p. 146.
[361] Kant: Kritik der Urtheilskraft (third edition, Berlin, 1799), Einleitung, pp. xvii.-xx. xxiv., xxv.
[362] Kant: Kritik der Urtheilskraft, Introduction, pp. xxv.-xxviii.
[363] Kant: Kritik der Urtheilskraft, Einleitung, pp. xxvi.-xxxiii.
[364] Ibidem, p. xxxiv.
[365] Ibidem, pp. xlviii.-lii.
77.
[367] Ibidem, pp. 279-283.
[368] Kant: Kritik der Urtheilskraft, pp. 286-288, 292-296.
[370] Kant: Kritik der Urtheilskraft. pp. 347, 348 (351).
[371] Kant: Kritik der Urtheilskraft, pp. 423, 424.
[372] What falls under this heading in Jacobi’s philosophy is inserted here in the lectures of 1825-1826.
[373] Fichte: Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre (Leipzig, 1794), Preface, p. xii.
[374] Fichte’s Leben und Briefwechsel, edited by his son, Pt. I. pp. 3, [375] Fichte’s posthumous works, which were not published until after Hegel’s death, nevertheless show that the writer in his lectures at the Berlin University likewise worked out scientifically this newly developed point of view in his philosophy; Fichte made a beginning in this regard brocheven in the ure which appeared in 1810: “Die Wissenschaftslehre in ihrem allgemeinen Umrisse” (v. Michelet: Geschichte der letzten Systeme der Philosophie, Pt. I. pp. 441, 442). [Editor’s note.]
[376] Fichte: Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre, pp. 10-12.
[377] Fichte: Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre, pp. 13, 14.
[378] Fichte: Ueber den Begriff der Wissenschaftslehre (Weimar, 1794), p.
12.
[379] Fichte: Grundlage der ges. Wissenschaftsl., Preface, pp. x., xi.
[380] Fichte: Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre, pp. 184, 185.
[381] Fichte: Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre, p. 3.
[382] Cf. Fichte: Ueber den Begriff der Wissenschaftslehre, pp. 13-17, 19-39, 50-52.