At last I have the pleasure of making public this third ■volume of the main work of Marx, the closing part of his economic theories. When I published the second volume, in 188 5, I thought that the third would probably offer only technical difficulties, with the exception of a few very im- portant sections. This turned out to be so. But that these exceptional sections, which represent the most valuable parts of the entire work, would give me as much trouble as they did, T could not foresee at that time any more than I an- ticipated the other obstacles, which retarded the completion of the work to such an extent.
In the first place it was a weakness of my eyes which re- stricted my time of writing to a minimum for years, and which permits me even now only exceptionally to do any writing by artificial light. There were furthermore other labors which I could not refuse, such as new editions and translations of earlier works of Marx and myself, revisions, prefaces, supplements, which frequently required special study, etc. There was above all the English edition of the first volume of this work, for whose text I am ultimately re- sponsible and which absorbed much of my time. Whoever has followed the colossal growth of international socialist lit- erature during the last ten years, especially the great number of translations of earlier works of Marx and myself, will agree with me in congratulating myself that there is but a limited number of languages in which I am able to assist a translator and which compel me to accede to the request for 9 lo Preface.
a revision. This growth of literature^ however, was but an evidence of a corresponding growth of the international work- ing class movement itself. And this imposed new obligations on me. From the very first days of our public activity, a good deal of the work of negotiation between the national movements of socialists and working people in the various countries had fallen on the shoulders of Marx and myself. This work increased to the extent that the movement as a whole gained in strength. Up to the time of his death, Marx had borne the brunt of this burden. But after that the ever swelling amount of work had to be done by myself alone. Meanwhile the direct intercourse between the various national labor parties has become the rule, and fortunately it is be- coming more and more so. Nevertheless my assistance is still in demand a good deal more than is agreeable to me in view of my theoretical studies. But if a man has been active in the movement for more than fifty years, as I have, he re- gards the work connected with it as a duty, which must not be shirked, but immediately fulfilled. In our stirring times, as in the 16th century, mere theorizers on public affairs are found only on the side of the reactionaries, and for this reason these gentlemen are not even theoretical scientists, but simply apologists of reaction.
The fact that I live in London implies that my intercourse with the party is limited in winter to correspondence, while in summer time it largely takes place by personal intendews. This fact, and the necessity of following the course of the movement in a steadily growing number of countries and a still more rapidly increasing number of party organs, com- pelled me to reserve matters which brooked no interruption for the winter months, preferably the first three months of the year. When a man is past seventy, his brain's fibers of association work with a certain disagreeable slowness. He Prefece. 1 1 does not overcome interruptions of difficult theoretical prob- lems as easily and quickly as formerly. Thus it came about that the work of one winter, if it was not completed, had to be largely done over the following winter. And this took place particularly in the case of the most difficult section, the fifth.
The reader will observe by the following statements that the work of editing the third was essentially different from that of the second volume. Nothing was available for the third volume but a first draft, and it was very incomplete. The beginnings of the various sections were, as a rule, pretty carefully elaborated, or even polished as to style. But the farther one proceeded, the more sketchy and incomplete was the analysis, the more excursions it contained into side issues whose proper place in the argument was left for later decision, the longer and more complex became the sentences, in which the rising thoughts were deposited as they came. In several places, the handwriting and the treatment of the matter clearly revealed the approach and gradual progress of those attacks of ill health, due to overwork, which at first rendered original work more and more difficult for the author and finally compelled him from time to time to stop work alto- gether. And no wonder. Between 1863 and 1867, Marx had not only completed the first draft of the two last vol- umes of Capital and made the first volume ready for the printer, but had also mastered the enormous work connected with the foundation and expansion of the International Workingmen's Association. The result was the appearance of the first symptoms of that ill health which is to blame for the fact that Marx did not himself put the finishing touches to the second and third volumes.
I began my work on these volumes by first dictating the entire manuscript of the original, which was often hard to decipher even for me, into readable copy. This required con- 12 Preface.
siderable time to begin with. It was only then that the real work of editing could proceed. I have limited this to the necessary minimum. Wherever it was sufficiently clear, I preserved the character of the first draft as much as possible. I did not even eliminate repetitions of the same thoughts, when they viewed the subject from another standpoint, as was Marx's custom, or at least expressed the same thought in different words. In cases where my alterations or addi- tions are not confined to editing, or where I used the material gathered by Marx for independent conclusions of my own, which, of course, are made as closely as possible in the spirit of Marx, I have enclosed the entire passage in brackets and aflBxed my initials. My footnotes may not be inclosed in brackets here and there, but wherever my initials are found, I am responsible for the entire note.
It is natural for a first draft, that there should be many passages in the manuscript which indicate points to be elab- orated later on, without being followed out in all cases. I have left them, nevertheless, as they are, because they reveal the intentions of the author relative to future elaboration.
Now as to details.
For the first part, the main manuscript was sei-viceable only with considerable restrictions. The entire mathematical calculation of the relation between the rate of surplus-value and the rate of profit (making up the contents of our chap- ter III) is introduced in the very beginning, while the sub- ject treated in our chapter I is considered later and in- cidentally. Two attempts of Marx at rewriting were useful in this case, each of them comprizing eight pages in folio. But even these were not consecutively worked out. They furnished the substance of what is now chapter I. Chapter II is taken from the main manuscript. There were quite a number of incomplete mathematical elaborations of chapter Preface. 13 III, and in addition thereto an entire and almost complete manuscript, \vritten in the seventies and dealing with the re- lation of the rate of surplus-value to the rate of profit, in the form of equations. My friend Samuel Moore, who had done the greater portion of the translation of the first volume, undertook to edit this manuscript for me, a work for which he was certainly better fitted than I, since he graduated from Cambridge in mathematics. By the help of his summary, and with an occasional use of the main manuscript, I completed chapter III. ISTothing Avas available for chapter IV but the title. But as the point of issue, the effect of the turn-over on the rate of profit, is of vital importance, I have elaborated it myself. For this reason the whole chapter has been placed between brackets. It was found in the course of this work, that the formula of chapter III for the rate of profit required some modification, in order to be generally applicable. Be- ginning with chapter V, the main manuscript is the sole basis for the remainder of Part I, although many transpositions and supplements were needed for it.
For the following three parts I could follow the original manuscript throughout, aside from editing the style. A few passages, referring mostly to the influence of the turn-over, had to be brought into agreement with my elaboration of chapter IV; these passages are likewise placed in brackets and marked with my initials.
The main difficulty was presented by Part V, which treated of the most complicated subject in the entire volume. And it was just at this point that Marx had been overtaken by one of those above-mentioned serious attacks of illness. Here, then, we had no finished draft, nor even an outline which might have been perfected, but only a first attempt at an elaboration, which more than once ended in a disarranged mass of notes, comments and extracts. I tried at first to com- 14 Preface.
14 Preface.
plete this part, as I had the first one, by filling out vacant spaces and fully elaborating passages that were only indi- cated, so that it would contain at least approximately every- thing which the author had intended. I tried this at least three times, but failed every time, and the time lost thereby explains most of the retardation. At last I recognized that I should not accomplish my object in this way. I should have had to go through the entire voluminous literature of this field; and the final result would have been something which would not have been Marx's book. I had no other choice than to cut the matter short, to confine myself to as orderly an arrangement as possible, and to add only the most indispensable supplements. And so I succeeded in completing the principal labors for this part in the spring of 1893.
As for the single chapters, chapters XXI to XXIV were, in the main, elaborated by Marx. Chapters XXV and XXVI required a sifting of the references and an interpola- tion of material found in other places. Chapters XXVII and XXIX could be taken almost completely from the original manuscript, but chapter XXVIII had to be arranged differ- ently in several places. The real difficulty began with chap- ter XXX. From now on the task before me was not only the arrangement of the references, but also a connecting of the line of reasoning, which was interrupted every moment by intervening clauses, deviations from the main point, etc., and taken up incidentally in quite another place. Thus chap- ter XXX came into existence by means of transpositions and eliminations utilized in other places. Chapter XXXI, again, was worked out more connectedly. But then followed a long section in the manuscript, entitled " The Confusion," consist- ing of nothing but extracts from the reports of Parliament on the crises of 1848 and 1857, in which the statements of twenty-three business men, and writers on economics, espe- Preface. 1 5 Preface. 1 5 ilally rfilative to money and capital, gold exports, over-specu- lation, etc., are collected and accompanied here and there with ^hort and playful comments. In this collection, all the cur- rent views of that time concerning the relation of money to capital are practically represented, either by answers or ques- tions, and Marx intended to analyze critically and satirically the confusion revealed by the ideas as to what was money, and what capital, on the money-market. I convinced myself after many experiments that this chapter could not be com- posed. I have used its material, particularly that criticized by Marx, wherever I found a connection for it.
N'ext follows in tolerable order the material which I have placed in chapter XXXII. But this is immediately followed by a new batch of extracts from reports of Parliament on every conceivable subject germane to thi^ part, intermingled with comments of the author. Toward the end these com- ments are mainly directed toward the movement of money metals and the quotations of bills of exchange, and they close with miscellaneous remarks. On the other hand, chapter XXXV, entitled " Precapitalist Conditions," was fully elab- orated.
Of all this material, beginning with the " Confusion," and using as much of it as had not been previously placed other- wise, I made up chapters XXXIII to XXXV. Of course this could not be done without considerable interpolations on my part in order to complete the connections. Unless these interpolations are of a merely formal nature, they are ex- pressly marked as belonging to me. In this way I have suc- ceeded in placing all the relevant statements of the author in the text of this work. Xothing has been left out but a small portion of the extracts, which either repeated statemente already made previously, or touched on points ivhich the original manuscript did not treat in detail.
1 6 Preface.
1 6 Preface.
The part dealing with ground-rent was much more fully elaborated, although not properly arranged. This is apparent from the fact that Marx found it necessary to recapitulate the plan of the entire part in chapter XLIII, which was the last portion of the section on rent in the manuscript. This was so much more welcome to the editor, as the manu- script began with chapter XXXVII, which was followed by chapters XLV to XLVII, whereupon chapters XXXVIII to XLIV came next in order. The greatest amount of labor was involved in getting up the tables for the differential rent, II and in the discovery that the third case of this class of rent, which belonged in chapter XLIII, had not been analyzed there.
Marx had made entirely new and special studies for this part on ground rent, in the seventies. He had studied for years the originals of the statistical reports and other publica- tions on real estate, which had become inevitable after the " reform " of 1861 in Russia. Tie had made extracts from these originals, which had been placed at his disposal to the fullest extent by his Russian friends, and he had intended to use these notes for a new elaboration of this part. Owing to the variety of forms represented by the real estate and the exploitation of the agricultural producers of Russia, this country was to play the same role in the part on ground rent that England did in volume I in tlie case of industrial wage- labor. Unfortunately he was prevented from carrying out this plan.
The seventh part, finally, was fully written out, but only as a first draft, whose endlessly involved periods had to be dis- sected, before they could be presented to the printer. Of the last chapter, only the beginning existed. In it the three great classes of developed capitalist society, land owners, capitalists and wage laborers, corresponding to the three great forms of Preface. 17 Preface. 17 revenue, and the class-struggle necessarily arising with their existence, were to be presented as the actual outcome of the capitalist period. It was a habit of Marx to reserve such concluding summaries for the final revision, so that the latest historical developments furnished him with never failing reg- ularity with the proofs of the correctness of his theoretical analyses.
The quotations and extracts corroborating his statements are considerably less numerous than in the first volume, as they already were in the second. Wherever the manuscript re- ferred to statements of earlier economists, only the name was given as a rule, and the quotations were to be added later. Of course, I had to leave this as it was. Of reports of parlia- ment only four have been used, but these were abundantly exploited. They are the following: 1) Reports from Committees (of the Lower House), Vol- ume VIII, Commercial Distress, Volume II, Part I, 1847-48. Minutes of Evidence. Quoted as " Commercial Distress, 2) Secret Committee of the House of Lords on Commer- cial Distress, 1847. Eeport printed 1848. Evidence printed 1857 (because it was considered too hazardous in 1848). — Quoted as " Commercial Distress, 1848-57."
3) & 4) Report, Bank Acts, 1857.— The same, 1858.— Reports of the Committee of the Lower House on the Effect of the Bank Acts of 1844 and 1845. With evidence.— Quoted as " Bank Acts," or " Bank Committee," 1857 or I hope to start on the fourth volume, the history of theories of surplus-value, as soon as conditions will pemiit me.
In the preface to the second volume of Capital I had to square accounts with those gentlemen, who were making much B 1 8 Preface.
ado over the alleged fact that they had discovered in the per- son of Rodbertus the " Secret source and a superior prede- cessor to Marx." I offered them an opportunity to show what the economics of Eodbertus could accomplish. I asked them to demonstrate the way " in which an equal average rate of profit can and must come about, not only without a violation of the law of value, but by means of it." These same gentle- men, who were then celebrating the brave Rodbertus as an economist star of the first magnitude, either for subjective or objective reasons which were as a rule anything but scientific, have without exception failed to answer the problem. How- ever, other people have thought it worth their w'hile to occupy themselves with this problem.
In his critique of the second volume (Conrad's Jahrhilclier, XI, 1885, pages 452-65), Professor Lexis takes up this ques- tion, although he does not pretend to give a direct solution of it. He says: " The solution of that contradiction " (namely the contradiction between the law of value of Ri- cardo-Marx and an equal average rate of profit) " is impos- sible, if the various classes of commodities are considered in- dividually, if their value is to be equal to their exchange- value, and this again equal or proportional to their price." According to him this solution is possible only, if " the deter- mination of value for the individual commodities according to labor is relinquished, the production of commodities viewed as a whole, and their distribution among the aggregate classes of capitalists and laborers regarded from the same point of view...The laboring class receives but a certain por- tion of the total product,...the other portion falls to the share of the capitalists and represents the surplus-product, as understood by Marx, and accordingly...the sur- plus-value. The members of the capitalist class divide this entire surplus-value among themselves, not in proportion to the Preface. 19 Preface. 19 number of laborers employed by them, but in proportion to the amount of capital invested by each one. The land is thereby regarded as belonging in the class of capital-value." The Marxian ideal values determined by the units of labor incor- porated in the commodities do not correspond to the prices, but may be " regarded as points o£ departure of a movement, which leads to the actual prices. These are conditioned on the fact that capitals of equal magnitude demand equal profits." In consequence some capitalists will secure higher prices for their commodities than the ideal values, and others will secure less. " But since the losses or gains of surplus- value mutually balance one another in the capitalist class, the total amount of the surplus-value is the same as though all prices were proportional to the ideal values."
It is evident that the problem has not been solved by any means through these statements, but it has been at least cor- rectly formulated, although in a somewhat loose and shallow manner. And this is, indeed, more than we had a right to expect from a man who prides himself somewhat on being a " vulgar economist." It is even surprising when compared with the handiwork of some other vulgar economists, which we shall discuss later. The vulgar economy of Lexis is of a rather peculiar nature. He says that the gains of the capital- ist may be derived in the way indicated by Marx, but there are no reasons that would compel us to accept this view. On the contrary, vulgar economy is said to have a simpler expla- nation, namely the following: " The capitalist sellers, such as the producer of raw materials, the manufacturer, the whole- sale dealer, the retail dealer, all make a profit on their trans- actions, each selling his product at a higher price than the purchase price, each adding a certain percentage to the price paid by him. The laborer alone is unable to raise the price of his commodity, he is compelled, by his oppressed condition, 20 Preface.
20 Preface.
to sell his labor to the capitalist at a price corresponding to its cost of production, that is to say, for the means of his sub- sistence...Therefore the capitalist additions to the prices strike the laborer with full force and result in the transfer of a part of the value of the total product to the capi- talist class."
I^ow it does not require much thought to show that this explanation of vulgar economy for the profits of capital amounts to the same thing as the Marxian theory of surplus- value. For Lexis thus admits that the laborers are in just that forced condition of oppression which Marx has described; that they are just as much exploited here as they are according to Marx, because every idler can sell commodities above their value, while the laborer alone cannot do so; and that it is j^st as easy to build up a plausible vulgar socialism on this theory, as it was to build up another kind of socialism in England on the foundation of Jevons' and Menger's theory of use- value and marginal profit. I strongly suspect that Mr. George Bernard Shaw, were he familiar with this theory of profit, would eagerly extend both hands for it, discard Jevons and Karl Menger, and build on this rock the Fabian church of the future.
In reality, this theory is merely a transcript of the Marxian. What is the fund out of which all these additions to the prices are paid? The " total product " of the working class. And it is due to the fact that the commodity " labor," or, as Marx has it, " labor-power," must be sold below its price. For if it is a common quality of all commodities to be sold at a price above their cost of production, with the sole exception of labor, then labor is sold below the price which is the rule in this world of vulgar economy. The extra profit thus accruing to the capitalist, or to the capitalist class, then arises in the last analysis from the fact that the laborer, after he has made Preface. 2 1 Preface. 2 1 up for the price of his labor-power by reproducing it, must produce a surplus-product for which he is not paid, in other words, he produces surplus-value representing unpaid labor. Lexis is very careful in the choice of his terms. He does not say anywhere outright that this is his own conception. But if it is, then it is evident that he is not one of those vulgar economists, every one of whom is, as he says himself, " a hope- less idiot in the eyes of Marx," but that he is a Marxian dis- guised as a vulgar economist. Whether this disguise is con- sciously or unconsciously adopted, is a psychological ques- tion which does not interest us at this point. The man who can find this out may also be able to discover how it is that some time ago a man of Lexis' intellectual endowments could defend such nonsense as bimetallism.
The first one who really attempted to answ^er this question was Dr. Konrad Schmidt in his pamphlet entitled. The Average Rate of Profit, Based on Marx's Theory of Value, Stuttgart, Dietz, 1889. Schmidt seeks to reconcile the de- tails of the formation of commodity prices with the theory of value and with an average rate of profit. The industrial capitalist receives in his product, first, an equiv- alent for the capital advanced by him, and second, a sur- plus-product for which he has not paid anything. But in order to earn his surplus-product, he must advance capital for its production. He must employ a certain quantity of ma- terialized labor for the purpose of appropriating this surplus- product. For the capitalist, the capital advanced by him represents the quantity of materialized labor which is socially necessary for the production of his surplus-product. This applies to every industrial capitalist. Now, since commodi- ties, according to the theory of value, are exchanged for one another in proportion to the social labor required for their production, and since the labor necessary for the manufacture 22 Preface.
22 Preface.
of the capitalist's surplus-product is accumulated in the cap- ital of the capitalist, it follows that surplus-products are ex- changed in proportion to the capitals required for their pro- duction, and not in proportion to the labor actually incor- porated in them. Hence the share of each unit of capital is equal to the sum of all produced surplus-values divided by the sum of the capitals employed in production. Accordingly, equal capitals yield equal profits in equal times, and this is accomplished by adding the cost price of the surplus-product figured on the basis of the average profit to the cost price of the paid product and selling both the paid and unpaid product at this increased price. Thus the average rate of profit arises in spite of the fact that, according to Schmidt, the average prices of commodities are determined by the law of value.
This is a very ingenious construction. It is made entirely after the Hegelian model, but it has this in common with the majority of the Hegelian constructions that it is not correct. It makes no difference whether the surplus-product or the paid product is considered. If the theory of value is to be ap- plied directly to the average profit both of these products must be sold in proportion to the socially necessary labor incorpor- ated in them. The theory of value is aimed at the very outset against the idea, derived from the capitalist mode of thought, that the accumulated labor of the past, which is embodied in capital, could be anything else but a certain quantity of finished values, namely also a creator of values greater than itself, see- ing that it is an element in production and in the formation of profit. The theory of value demonstrates that living labor alone has this faculty of creating surplus-values. It is well known that the capitalists expect to reap profits in proportion to the magnitude of their capitals, looking upon their advances of capital as a sort of cost price of their profits. But if Preface. 23 Preface. 23 Schmidt utilizes this conception for the purpose of harmoniz- ing by means of it the prices calculated according to the aver- age rate of profit and those based on the theory of value, he thereby repudiates this theory of value, for he embodies in it as one of its factors a conception which is wholly at variance with it.
Either accumulated labor creates values the same as living labor, and in that case the law of value does not apply.
Or, it is not a creator of values, and in that case Schmidt's demonstration is irreconcilable with the law of value.