What has he done for his future? Nothing. Has he any assured position? No. What expectations has he? None. Even this trifling matter: what will he do to pass the time Selections from the Writings of Kierkegaard 187 when he grows older, the long winter nights, what will he do to make them pass — why, he cannot even play cards! He is now enjoying a bit of popular favor — in truth, of all movable property the most movable — which in a trice may turn into an enormous popular hatred of him. — Join his company? No, thank you, I am still, thank God, in my right mind."
Or he may reason as follows: "That there is something extraordinary about this person — even if one reserves tne right, both one's own and that of common sense, to refrain from venturing any opinion as to his claim of being God — about that there is really little doubt. Rather, one might be indignant at Providence's having entrusted such a person with these powers — a person who does the very opposite of what he himself bids us do: that we shall not cast our pearls before the swine; for which reason he will, as he himself predicts, come to grief by their turning about and trampling him under their feet. One may always expect this of swine; but, on the other hand, one would not expect that he who had himself called attention to this likelihood, himself would do precisely^- what he knows one should not do. If only there were some means of cleverly stealing his wisdom — for I shall gladly leave him in indisputed posses- sion of that very peculiar thought of his that he is God — if one could but rob his wisdom without, at the same time, becoming his disciple! If one could only steal up to him at night and lure it from him; for I am more than equal to editing and publishing it, and better than he, if you please.
I undertake to astonish the whole world by getting some- thing altogether different out of it; for I clearly see there is something wondrously profound in what he says, and the misfortune is only that he is the man he is. But perhaps, who knows, perhaps it is feasible, anyway, to fool him out of it. Perhaps in that respect too he is good-natured and simple enough to communicate it quite freely to me. It is not impossible; for it seems to me that the wisdom he un- questionably possesses, evidently has been entrusted to a fool, seeing there is so much contradiction in his life. — But '2The original here does not agree with the sense of the passage.
188 University of Texas Bulletin as to joining his company and becoming his disciple — no, indeed, that would be the same as becoming a fool oneself." Or he might reason as follows: "If this person does indeed mean to further what is good and true (I do not venture to decide this), he is helpful at least, in this respect, to youths and inexperienced people. For they will be benefited, in this serious life of ours, by learning, the sooner the better, and very thoroughly — he opens the eyes even of the blindest to this — that all this pretense of wishing to live only for goodness and truth contains a considerable admixture of the ridiculous. He proves how right the poets of our times are when they let truth and goodness be represented by some half-witted fellow, one who is so stupid that you can knock down a wall with him. The idea of exerting one's self, as this man does, of renouncing everything but pains and trouble, to be at beck and call all day long, more eager than the busiest family physician — and pray why? Because he makes a living by it? No, not in the very least; it has never occurred to him, as far as I can see, to want something in return. Does he earn any money by it? No, not a red cent — he has not a red cent to his name, and if he did he would forthwith give it away. Does he, then, aspire to a position of honor and dignity in the state? On the contrary, he loathes all worldly honor. And he who, as I said, condemns all worldly honor, and practices the art of living on noth- ing; he who, if any one, seems best fitted to pass his life in a most comfortable dolce far niente — which is not such a bad thing —: he lives under a greater strain than any gov- ernment official who is rewarded by honor and dignity, lives under a greater strain than any business man who earns money like sand. Why does he exert himself thus, or (why this question about a matter not open to question?) why should any one exert himself thus — in order to attain to the happiness of being ridiculed, mocked, and so forth? To be sure, a peculiar kind of pleasure! That one should push one's way through a crowd to reach the spot where money, honor, and glory are distributed — why, that is perfectly understandable; but to push forward to be whipped: how exalted, how Christian, how stupid!"
Selections from the Writings of Kierkegaard 189 Or he will reason as follows: "One hears so many rash opinions about this person from people who understand nothing — and worship him; and so many severe condemna- tions of him by those who, perhaps, misunderstand him after all. As for me, I am not going to allow myself to be accused of venturing a hasty opinion, I shall keep entirelj'^ cool and calm; in fact, which counts for still more, I am conscious of being as reasonable and moderate with him as is possible. Grant now — which, to be sure. I do only to a certain extent — grant even that one's reason is im- pressed by this person. What, then, is my opinion about him? My opinion is, that for the present, I can form no opinion about him. I do not mean about his claim of being God; for about that I can never in all eternity have an opinion. No, I mean about him as a man. Only by the consequences of his life shall we be able to decide whether he was an extraordinary person or whether, deceived by his imagination, he applied too high a standard, not only to himself, but also to humanity in general. More I cannot do for him, try as I may — if he were my only friend, my own child, I could not judge him more leniently, nor differ- ently, either. It follows from this, to be sure, that in all probability, and for good reasons, I shall not ever be able to have any opinion about him. For in order to be able to form an opinion I must first see the consequences of his life, including his very last moments; that is, he must be dead. Then, and perhaps not even then, may I form an opinion of him. And> even granting this, it is not really an opinion about him, for he is then no more. No more is needed to say why it is impossible for me to join him while he is liv- ing. The authority he is said to show in his teaching can have no decisive influence in my case; for it is surely easy to see that his thought moves in a circle. He quotes as authority that which he is to prove, which in its turn can be proved only by the consequences of his life; provided, of course, it is not connected with that fixed idea of his about being God, because if it is therefore he has this au- thority (because he is God) the answer must be: yes — if! So much, however, I may admit, that if I could imagine my- 190 University of Texas Bulletin self living in some later age, and if the consequences of his life as shown in history had made it plain that he was the extraordinary person he in a former age claimed to be, then it might very well be — in fact, I might come very near, becoming his disciple."
An ecclesiastic would reason as follows: "For an impostor and demagogue he has, to say the truth, a remarkable air of honesty about him; for which reason he cannot be so ab- solutely dangerous, either, even though the situation looks dangerous enough while the squall is at its height, and even though the situation looks dangerous enough with his enor- mous popularity — until the squall has passed over and the people — yes, precisely the people — overthrow him again. The honest thing about him is his claim to be the Messiah when he resembles him so little as he does. That is hon- est, just as if some one in preparing bogus paper-money made the bills so poorly that every one who knows the least about it cannot fail to detect the fraud. — True enough, we all look forward to a Messiah, but surely no one with any sense expects God himself to come, and every religious per- son shudders at the blasphemous attitude of this person. We look forward to a Messiah, we are all agreed on that. But the governance of the world does not go forward tu- multuously, by leaps and bounds; the development of the world, as is indicated by the very fact that it is a develop- ment, proceeds by evolution, not by revolution. The true Messiah will therefore look quite different, and will arrive as the most glorious flower, and the highest development, of that which already exists. Thus will the true Messiah come, and he will proceed in an entirely different fashion: he will recognize the existing order as the basis of things, he will summon all the clergy to council and present to them the results accomplished by him, as well as his credentials — and then, if he obtain the majority of the votes when the ballot is cast, he will be received and saluted as the extra- ordinary person, as the one he is: the Messiah.^' "However, there is a duplicity in this man's behavior; he ^^Bjornson's play of "Beyond Human Power," Part I, Act 2, reads like an elaboration of these views.
Selections from the Writings of Kierkegaard 191 assumes too much the role of judge. It seems as if he wished to be, at one and the same time, both the judge who passes sentence on the existing order of things, and the Messiah. If he does not wish to play the role of the judge, then why his absolute isolation, his keeping at a distance from all which has to do with the existing order of things? And if he does not wish to be the judge, then why his fan- tastic flight from reality to join the ignorant crowd, then why with the haughtiness of a revolutionary does he de- spise all the intelligence and eflSciency to be found in the existing order of things? And why does he begin afresh altogether, and absolutely from the bottom up, by the help of — fishermen and artisans? May not the fact that he is an illegitimate child fitly characterize his entire relation to the existing order of things? On the other hand, if he wishes to be only the Messiah, why then his warning about putting a piece of new cloth unto an old garment.'* For these words are precisely the watchwords of every revolu- tion since they are expressive of a person's discontent with the existing order and of his wish to destroy it. That is, these words reveal his desire to remove existing conditions, rather than to build on them and better them, if one is a reformer, or to develop them to their highest possibility, if one is indeed the Messiah. This is duplicity. In fact, it is not feasible to be both judge and Messiah. Such du- plicit\' will surely result in his downfall.^ ' The climax in the life of a judge is his death by violence, and so the poet pictures it correctly; but the climax in the life of the Mes- siah cannot possibly be his death. Or else, by that very fact, he would not be the Messiah, that is, he whom the ex- isting order expects in order to deify him. This duplicity has not as yet been recognized by the people, who see in him their Messiah; but the existing order of things cannot by any manner of means recognize him as such. The people, the idle and loafing crowd, can do so only because they represent nothing less than the existing order of things.
i^Matthew 9, 16.
i''The following passage is capable of different interpretations in the original.
192 University of Texas Bulletin But as soon as the duplicity becomes evident to them, his doom is sealed. Why, in this respect his predecessor was a far more definitely marked personality, for he was but one thing, the judge. But what confusion and thoughtless- ness, to wish to be both, and what still worse confusion, to acknowledge his predecessor as the judge — that is, in other words, precisely to make the existing order of things re- ceptive and ripe for the Messiah who is to come after the judge, and yet not wish to associate himself with the exist- ing order of things!"
And the philosopher would reason as follows: "Such dreadful or, rather, insane vanity, that a single individual claims to be God, is a thing hitherto unheard of. Never before have we been witness to such an excess of pure sub- jectivity and sheer negation. He has no doctrines, no sys- tem of philosophy, he knows really nothing, he simply keeps on repeating, and making variations on, some unconnected aphoristic sentences, some few maxims, and a couple of parables by which he dazzles the crowd for whom he also performs signs and wonders; so that they, instead of learn- ing something, or being improved, come to believe in one who in a most brazen way constantly forces his subjective views on us. There is nothing objective or positive what- ever in him and in what he says. Indeed, from a philosoph- ical point of view, he does not need to fear destruction for he has perished already, since it is inherent in the nature of subjectivity to perish. One may in all fairness admit that his subjectivity is remarkable and that, be it as it may with the other miracles, he constantly repeats his miracle with the five small loaves,^" viz., by means of a few lyric utter- ances and some aphorisms he rouses the whole country. But even if one were inclined to overlook his insane notion of affirming himself to be God, it is an incomprehensible mis- take, which, to be sure, demonstrates a lack of philosophic training, to believe that God could reveal himself in the form of an individual. The race, the universal, the total, is God; but the race surely is not an individual! Generally speaking, that is the impudent assumption of subjectivity, -Matthew 14, 17.
Selections from the Writings of Kierkegaard 193 which claims that the individual is something extraordinary. But sheer insanity is shown in the claim of an individual to be God. Because if the insane thing were possible, viz. that an individual might be God, why, then this individual would have to be worshipped, and a more beastly philo- sophic stupidity is not conceivable."
The astute statesman would reason as follows: "That at present this person wields great power is undeniable — en- tirely disregarding, of course, this notion of his that he is God. Foibles like these, being idiosyncrasies, do not count against a man and concern no one, least of all a statesman. A statesman is concerned only with what power a man wields; and that he does wield great power cannot, as I have remarked, be denied. But what he intends to do, what his aim is, I cannot make out at all. If this be calculation it must be of an entirely new and peculiar order, not so alto- gether unlike what is otherwise called madness. He pos- sesses points of considerable strength; but he seems to de- feat, rather than to use, it; he expends it without himself getting any returns. I consider him a phenomenon with which — as ought to be one's rule with all phenomena — a wise man should not have anything to do, since it is im- possible to calculate him or the catastrophe threatening his life. It is possible that he will be made king. It is pos- sible, I say; but it is not impossible, or rather, it is just as- possible, that he may end on the gallows. He lacks earnest- ness in all his endeavors. With all his enormous stretch of wings he only hovers and gets nowhere. He does not seem to have any definite plan of procedure, but just hovers. Is it for his nationality he is fighting, or does he aim at a communistic revolution? Does he wish to establish a re- public or a kingdom? With which party does he affiliate himself to combat which party, or does he wish to fight all parties?
"I have anything to do with him? — No, that would be the very last thing to enter my mind. In fact, I take all pos- sible precautions to avoid him. I keep quiet, undertake nothing, act as if I did not exist; for one cannot even calcu- late how he might interfere with one's undertakings, be they 194 University of Texas Bulletin ever so unimportant, or at any rate, how one might become involved in the vortex of his activities. Dangerous, in a certain sense enormously dangerous, is this man. But I calculate that I may ensnare him precisely by doing noth- ing. For overthrown he must be. And this is done most safely by letting him do it himself, by letting him stumble over himself. I have, at least at this moment, not sufficient power to bring about his fall; in fact, I know no one who has. To undertake the least thing against him now, means to be crushed one's self. No, my plan is constantly to exert only negative resistance to him, that is, to do nothing, and he will probably involve himself in the enormous conse- quences he draws after him, till in the end he will tread on his own train, as it were, and thus fall."
And the steady citizen would reason as follows (which would then become the opinion of his family): "Now, let us be human, everything is good when done in moderation, too little and too much spoil everything, and as a French saying has it which I once heard a traveling salesman use: every power which exceeds itself comes to a fall — and as to this person, his fall is certainly sure enough, I have earn- estly spoken to my son and warned and admonished him not to drift into evil ways and join that person. And why? Because all people are running after him. That is to say, what sort of people? Idlers and loafers, street-walkers and tramps, who run after everything. But mightly few of the men who have house and property, and nobody who is wise and respected, none after whom I set my clock, neither councillor Johnson, nor senator Anderson, nor the wealthy broker Nelson — oh no! they know what's what. And as to the ministry who ought to know most about such matters — ah, they will have none of him. What was it pastor Green said in the club the other evening? That man will yet come to a terrible end,' he said. And Green, he can do more than preach, you oughtn't to hear him Sundays in church so much as Mondays in the club — I just wished I had half his knowl- edge of affairs! He said quite correctly, and as if spoken out of my own heart: 'Only idlers and loafers are running after that man.' And why do they run after him? Be- cause he performs some miracles. But who is sure they are Selections from the Writings of Kierkegaard 195 miracles, or that he can confer the same power on his dis- ciples? And, in any case, a miracle is somethng mightly uncertain, whereas the certain is the certain. Every se- rious father who has grown-up children must be truly alarmed lest his sons be seduced and join that man together with the desperate characters who follow him — desperate characters who have nothing to lose. And even these, how does he help them? Why, one must be mad to wish to be helped in this fashion. Even the poorest beggar is brought to a worse estate than his former one, is brought to a pass he could have escaped by remaining what he was, that is, a beggar and no more."
And the mocker, not the one hated on account of his malice, but the one who is admired for his wit and liked for his good nature, he would reason as follows: "It is, after all, a rich idea which is going to prove useful to all of us, that an individual who is in no wise different from us claims to be God. If that is not being a benefactor of the race then I don't know what charity and beneficence are. If we as- sume that the characteristic of being God — well, who in all the world would have hit on that idea? How true that such an idea could not have entered into the heart of man^' — but if we assume that it consists in looking in no wise different from the rest of us, and in nothing else: why, then we are all gods. Q. E. D. Three cheers for him, the inventor of a discovery so extraordinarily important for mankind! To- morrow I, the undersigned, shall proclaim that I am God, and the discoverer at least will not be able to contradict me without contradicting himself. At night all cats are gray; and if to be God consists in looking like the rest of us, abso- lutely and altogether like the rest of mankind: why, then it is night and we all are..., or what is it 1 wanted to say: we all are God, every one of us, and no one has a right to say he isn't as well off as his neighbor. This is the most ridiculous situation imaginable, the contradiction here being the greatest imaginable, and a contradiction always making for a comical effect. But this is in no wise my discovery, but solely that of the discoverer: this idea that a man of exactly the same appearance as the rest of us, only not half I'Cf. 1 Cor. 2, 9.
196 University of Texas Bulletin so well dressed as the average man, that is, a poorly dressed person who, rather than being God, seems to invite the at- tention of the society for the relief of the poor — that he is God! I am only sorry for the director of the charitable society that he will not get a raise from this general ad- vancement of the human race but that he will, rather, lose his job on account of this, etc."