< it; of tat sats senarate from part in the se cranent spain howotiral. re you say that the 2 bY omic their. mode of. ek first about that anentitative: a thing Aistinct from anentity.
ee quantity sitet avd the auantitstive made does onain;thorefores they are jistinet ‘things. | But that y are not distinct things can bs proved, because if is » distinet thing, it is either a different abate sean or a @ifterent relative thinge It is aa genera shee ause it is” not in quantity in agtionynor in vassion,nor in the genus,relation, in situationynor in possession, nor in plage, cone ernang ch it might appear that that quentitative moue ean without every ubi-e For o fs Goa ould iesate ane: ntue without every other dai nytt would trulg be quantitative mode and yet more every Wwode ides it yas shown before that every. continuous and ianent quantinn has part sevarate from part; just as evid ent vefore from John of Damascus,or those emote are convertible: squantiun continuous and cyenegintes naving Fart ‘s ‘oun porte Proin nt 1 argue thueiit is imposed Le atime be 8 quanti continuous and peris ganenty at ee apse separate ‘aie parte | Thero~ Of christ ds a quantum in the sacrament poy of dhrist wad ne a thing having part Se frou paet in the sacrame nt of the altare Besides, @ body of shedst is a qaentin in the satranent of patore long, vide and aoep; but 4 is mn as from pert; there- apie Shrist is a Ghee in the sacrament it Date yor sefien that the body of Ue Ae nat a | tain thereon. the sontrary(if you ican that) body. ees ‘onrist has quantity inhering be Ltii% ae there. 8 cmenting there; juet as wherever something has Lica’ _Dihering adn ity there is a white thing there; fore, at peters: to detract from the verity od ane ament og the mm scharist to say that the pods. of Christ one qnantity or extension inhébing init in the amnent of the alter; for then it vould be extended Rneee t would have ‘part separate from partewhich is Ce ‘And indeed no Sithor how much that. proposition ‘be consededs the hoiy ef. onrist is a event exe’ roposition is true,the body of ing neving part sepezete frou a a os oe i oe nt does: ‘not exist ar not parte placed outside of ts or parts separate in situation, rhether those | are parts of a. -gubetan nce OT parts of e quality.
indeed juet as this proposition’ +6) true; the body sntist paving perts separa ate in situetion ie snorament of ‘the altar, and yet this Ge eeacition is seythe body of christ has parte & parate. in situation eaeranent of the oe | | poeitiori would ve conopiedya quantity “sion 4 ae the body of cnrist in the. sac ohoea oF the.
B eientity te the cneranent of the » shtorisust oe sa sattors ait is or inueh iportance to affirm sone- ng on the vert of a subject which is especially of eonnotative. nouns, such as - the noun,quantitys a se thie noun, quantity, sighifies 2 thing hy con= ng et parts of thet thing are separate in situetion; “weason this proposition is true,the quantity bbe ton the bas t: profound inveetigator,e most a Foy, RUSE ORIG huh Tage hoi geey soe 7: ‘Sacred Theology,of the order of after the Feast of the Epiphany of the ee vd ‘ i: ies Le ore rages fea A at thane fy 7 te ee 3 1198 05762 6374 es, ny N/14198/057b2/4371x ia Pegs * eae. a? i ax. Ay catted 5 Sb 5 A ae ea Sa