Història dels animals
- Idioma:
- anglès
- Completesa:
- Obra completa
- Autoria:
- Escrita per l'autor
- Estat del text:
- Text net
- Extensió:
- ~130.000 paraules · 633 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
- APAAristòtil. (n.d.). Història dels animals. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/aristotle/aristotle-s-history-of-animals
- MLAAristòtil. "Història dels animals." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/aristotle/aristotle-s-history-of-animals.
- ChicagoAristòtil. Història dels animals. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/aristotle/aristotle-s-history-of-animals.
De què tracta
La recopilacio d'Aristotil del que se sabia i del que ell mateix va observar sobre els animals: el primer tractat de zoologia que s'ha conservat.
Context i història
«Historia» aqui vol dir «indagacio», no relat del passat. El llibre descriu parts, habits, reproduccio, alimentacio i comportament de centenars d'especies, i el metode es el que el fa notable: Aristotil dissecciona, compara i classifica, i quan no ha vist una cosa ho diu o cita qui la hi ha explicat. Hi ha errors —n'hi ha molts, alguns venen de pescadors i criadors que el van informar malament—, i hi ha observacions que no es van tornar a confirmar fins al segle XIX, com la reproduccio del pop o el desenvolupament de l'embrio del pollastre dia a dia. Darwin va escriure que els seus deus de la ciencia eren nens de parvulari al costat del vell Aristotil.
Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.
The following Translation of Aristotle's History of Animals has been made from the text of Schneider. In a work of considerable difficulty it is hardly possible entirely to avoid errors; but it is hoped that those which have escaped are neither numerous nor important. The notes of Schneider have been consulted throughout; and in places of difficulty the English translation by Taylor, the French of Camus, and the German of Strack, have been severally referred to. The work itself is the most ancient and celebrated contribution to science which has come down to us; and it is hardly possible, when we consider the means of observation which were accessible at the time, to imagine a work of more accurate observation. From the numerous quotations in which our author avails himself of the experience of his predecessors in the same field, as well as corrects their errors, there can be no doubt that Aristotle had the advantage of many works which have perished in the lapse of ages. In the Appendix to the present Translation will be found the Essay of Schneider on the sources whence Aristotle derived his knowledge of the animals he describes; and these sources, together with his own accurate observations, are probably sufficient to account for the correct knowledge of the history of animals displayed throughout the work. It is right, perhaps, to observe in this place, that Dr. Smith, in his Dictionary of Biography, speaks of the 'History of Animals' as partly the result of the royal liberality of Alexander; and doubtless Aristotle would gladly have introduced into his work any fresh materials which might have been made available to him either during his residence at the Macedonian court, or by the subsequent victories of Alexander in the East, if the information so obtained had reached Athens in sufficient time to be incorporated.…