SigPhiSigPhi

Sobre la locomoció dels animals

Aristòtil

Idioma:
anglès
Completesa:
Obra completa
Autoria:
Escrita per l'autor
Estat del text:
Text net
Extensió:
~9.470 paraules · 45 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
  • APAAristòtil. (n.d.). Sobre la locomoció dels animals. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/aristotle/on-the-progression-of-animals
  • MLAAristòtil. "Sobre la locomoció dels animals." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/aristotle/on-the-progression-of-animals.
  • ChicagoAristòtil. Sobre la locomoció dels animals. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/aristotle/on-the-progression-of-animals.

De què tracta

Per què els animals tenen les potes que tenen, i per què sempre en nombre parell.

Context i història

Anatomia comparada abans que existís el nom: relaciona la forma de les extremitats amb la manera de desplaçar-se i amb el medi. És dels textos on més es veu Aristòtil com a observador de camp.

Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.

Com comença
We have now to consider the parts which are useful to animals for movement in place (locomotion); first, why each part is such as it is and to what end they possess them; and second, the differences between these parts both in one and the same creature, and again by comparison of the parts of creatures of different species with one another. First then let us lay down how many questions we have to consider. The first is what are the fewest points of motion necessary to animal progression, the second why sanguineous animals have four points and not more, but bloodless animals more than four, and generally why some animals are footless, others bipeds, others quadrupeds, others polypods, and why all have an even number of feet, if they have feet at all; why in fine the points on which progression depends are even in number. Next, why are man and bird bipeds, but fish footless; and why do man and bird, though both bipeds, have an opposite curvature of the legs. For man bends his legs convexly, a bird has his bent concavely; again, man bends his arms and legs in opposite directions, for he has his arms bent convexly, but his legs concavely. And a viviparous quadruped bends his limbs in opposite directions to a man's, and in opposite directions to one another; for he has his forelegs bent convexly, his hind legs concavely. Again, quadrupeds which are not viviparous but oviparous have a peculiar curvature of the limbs laterally away from the body. Again, why do quadrupeds move their legs criss-cross? We have to examine the reasons for all these facts, and others cognate to them; that the facts are such is clear from our Natural History, we have now to ask reasons for the facts. Part 2

Llegeix l'obra sencera →

← Torna a Aristòtil