SigPhiSigPhi

Lettres Provinciales

Pascal

Idioma:
anglès
Completesa:
Obra completa
Autoria:
Escrita per l'autor
Estat del text:
Sense soroll d'escaneig detectat (mesura automàtica sobre tot el text, no revisada a mà)
Extensió:
~120.000 paraules · 575 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
  • APAPascal. (n.d.). Lettres Provinciales. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/blaise-pascal/lettres-provinciales
  • MLAPascal. Lettres Provinciales. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/blaise-pascal/lettres-provinciales.
  • ChicagoPascal. Lettres Provinciales. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/blaise-pascal/lettres-provinciales.

Referència de l’edició reproduïda. SigPhi és la reproducció digital, no l’editor. S’hi inclouen l’any, l’editorial i el traductor quan consten; «n.d.» indica que no consta l’any. La responsabilitat d’un pròleg o d’una nota es determina segons el passatge citat.

De què tracta

L'original frances de les «Provincials», del 1656-57: el text que s'ha de citar, i el que va crear la prosa francesa moderna.

Context i història

Al catàleg hi ha tambe una traduccio anglesa amb introduccio historica; aquesta es l'obra tal com Pascal la va escriure, i es important perque en aquest cas la llengua es el argument. El que va fer que aquestes divuit cartes anonimes triomfessin no va ser nomes el que deien contra la casuistica dels jesuites, sino com ho deien: en frances corrent, amb dialeg, ironia i frases curtes, en un temps en què una disputa teologica s'escrivia en llati i per a especialistes. Voltaire va dir que era el primer llibre de geni escrit en prosa francesa. Van ser cremades per ordre reial i posades a l'index el 1660.

Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.

Extracte de l’edició disponible
The question here was, if he could, without presumption, entertain a doubt that these propositions were in Jansenius, after the bishops had declared that they were. The matter having been brought before the Sorbonne, seventy-one doctors undertook his defence, maintaining that the only reply he could possibly give to the demands made upon him in so many publications, calling on him to say if he held that these propositions were in that book, was that he had not been able to find them, but that if they were in the book, he condemned them in the book. Some even went a step farther and protested that, after all the search they had made into the book, they had never stumbled upon these propositions, and that they had, on the contrary, found sentiments entirely at variance with them. They then earnestly begged that, if any doctor present had discovered them, he would have the goodness to point them out; adding that what was so easy could not reasonably be refused, as this would be the surest way to silence the whole of them, M. Arnauld included; but this proposal has been uniformly declined. So much for the one side. On the other side are eighty secular doctors and some forty mendicant friars, who have condemned M. Arnauld's proposition, without choosing to examine whether he has spoken truly or falsely- who, in fact, have declared that they have nothing to do with the veracity of his proposition, but simply with its temerity. Besides these, there were fifteen who were not in favor of the censure, and who are called Neutrals. Such was the issue of the question of fact, regarding which, I must say, I give myself very little concern. It does not affect my conscience in the least whether M.…

Llegeix aquesta edició →

← Torna a Pascal