SigPhiSigPhi

The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life

Émile Durkheim

Idioma:
anglès
Traducció:
J. W. Swain
Completesa:
Obra completa
Autoria:
Escrita per l'autor
Estat del text:
Text net
Extensió:
~270.000 paraules · 1.285 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
  • APAÉmile Durkheim. (n.d.). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/emile-durkheim/the-elementary-forms-of-the-religious-life
  • MLAÉmile Durkheim. "The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/emile-durkheim/the-elementary-forms-of-the-religious-life.
  • ChicagoÉmile Durkheim. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/emile-durkheim/the-elementary-forms-of-the-religious-life.

De què tracta

El llibre on Durkheim busca la forma més simple de religió per entendre-les totes, i on conclou que allò que una societat adora, sense saber-ho, és ella mateixa.

Context i història

Publicat el 1912. Pren com a cas elemental el totemisme dels pobles aborígens australians, i aquí cal una precisió honesta: Durkheim no hi va anar mai. Treballa sobre etnografies d'altri, i aquell material ha estat molt qüestionat després, tant per la qualitat com pel supòsit que aquelles societats fossin «elementals». L'argument sociològic —el sagrat com a força col·lectiva, el ritual com allò que la manté viva— s'ha sostingut molt millor que el material sobre el qual es va construir.

Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.

Com comença
SUBJECT OF OUR STUDY: RELIGIOUS SOCIOLOGY AND THE THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE In this book we propose to study the most primitive and simple religion which is actually known, to make an analysis of it, and to attempt an explanation of it. A religious system may be said to be the most primitive which we can observe when it fulfils the two following conditions: in the first place, when it is found in a society whose organization is surpassed by no others in simplicity;[1] and secondly, when it is possible to explain it without making use of any element borrowed from a previous religion. We shall set ourselves to describe the organization of this system with all the exactness and fidelity that an ethnographer or an historian could give it. But our task will not be limited to that: sociology raises other problems than history or ethnography. It does not seek to know the passed forms of civilization with the sole end of knowing them and reconstructing them. But rather, like every positive science, it has as its object the explanation of some actual reality which is near to us, and which consequently is capable of affecting our ideas and our acts: this reality is man, and more precisely, the man of to-day, for there is nothing which we are more interested in knowing. Then we are not going to study a very archaic religion simply for the pleasure of telling its peculiarities and its singularities. If we have taken it as the subject of our research, it is because it has seemed to us better adapted than any other to lead to an understanding of the religious nature of man, that is to say, to show us an essential and permanent aspect of humanity.

Llegeix l'obra sencera →

← Torna a Émile Durkheim