SigPhiSigPhi

The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life

Émile Durkheim

Idioma:
anglès
Traducció:
J. W. Swain
Completesa:
Obra completa
Autoria:
Escrita per l'autor
Estat del text:
Sense soroll d'escaneig detectat (mesura automàtica sobre tot el text, no revisada a mà)
Extensió:
~270.000 paraules · 1.285 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
  • APAÉmile Durkheim. (n.d.). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (J. W. Swain, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/emile-durkheim/the-elementary-forms-of-the-religious-life
  • MLAÉmile Durkheim. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Translated by J. W. Swain. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/emile-durkheim/the-elementary-forms-of-the-religious-life.
  • ChicagoÉmile Durkheim. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Translated by J. W. Swain. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/emile-durkheim/the-elementary-forms-of-the-religious-life.

Referència de l'edició que reprodueix SigPhi: SigPhi n'és la reproducció digital, no l'editor. L'any de l'edició no consta a les metadades (per això «n.d.») i el traductor només hi surt quan consta.

De què tracta

El llibre on Durkheim busca la forma més simple de religió per entendre-les totes, i on conclou que allò que una societat adora, sense saber-ho, és ella mateixa.

Context i història

Publicat el 1912. Pren com a cas elemental el totemisme dels pobles aborígens australians, i aquí cal una precisió honesta: Durkheim no hi va anar mai. Treballa sobre etnografies d'altri, i aquell material ha estat molt qüestionat després, tant per la qualitat com pel supòsit que aquelles societats fossin «elementals». L'argument sociològic —el sagrat com a força col·lectiva, el ritual com allò que la manté viva— s'ha sostingut molt millor que el material sobre el qual es va construir.

Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.

Com comença
the causes which called it into existence, though remaining active, are no longer perceived, except across a vast scheme of interpretations which quite transform them. Popular mythologies and subtile theologies have done their work: they have superimposed upon the primitive sentiments others which are quite different, and which, though holding to the first, of which they are an elaborated form, only allow their true nature to appear very imperfectly. The psychological gap between the cause and the effect, between the apparent cause and the effective cause, has become more considerable and more difficult for the mind to leap. The remainder of this book will be an illustration and a verification of this remark on method. It will be seen how, in the primitive religions, the religious fact still visibly carries the mark of its origins: it would have been well-nigh impossible to infer them merely from the study of the more developed religions. The study which we are undertaking is therefore a way of taking up again, _but under new conditions_, the old problem of the origin of religion. To be sure, if by origin we are to understand the very first beginning, the question has nothing scientific about it, and should be resolutely discarded. There was no given moment when religion began to exist, and there is consequently no need of finding a means of transporting ourselves thither in thought. Like every human institution, religion did not commence anywhere. Therefore, all speculations of this sort are justly discredited; they can only consist in subjective and arbitrary constructions which are subject to no sort of control. But the problem which we raise is quite another one. What we want to do is to find a means of discerning the ever-present causes upon which the most essential forms of religious thought and practice depend.…

Llegeix l'obra sencera →

← Torna a Émile Durkheim