Reflections on Violence
- Idioma:
- anglès
- Traducció:
- T. E. Hulme
- Completesa:
- Obra completa
- Autoria:
- Escrita per l'autor
- Estat del text:
- Text net
- Extensió:
- ~110.000 paraules · 541 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
- APAGeorges Sorel. (n.d.). Reflections on Violence. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/georges-sorel/reflections-on-violence
- MLAGeorges Sorel. "Reflections on Violence." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/georges-sorel/reflections-on-violence.
- ChicagoGeorges Sorel. Reflections on Violence. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/georges-sorel/reflections-on-violence.
De què tracta
El llibre del 1908 en què Sorel defensa la vaga general no com una tactica sino com un «mite»: una imatge que mou els homes a actuar encara que no s'hagi de realitzar mai tal com se la imaginen.
Context i història
Es un dels textos mes incomodes del corpus, i convé dir per que. Sorel venia del marxisme i el trobava massa racionalista: sostenia que les masses no es mouen per calculs sino per imatges totals, i que el sindicalisme revolucionari havia de conservar la seva capacitat de conflicte en comptes de negociar-la. Distingia la «violencia» proletaria de la «força» de l'Estat, i menyspreava la democracia parlamentaria com una manera d'apagar el conflicte. Aquestes idees van ser recollides tant per l'esquerra sindicalista com pel feixisme italia, i Sorel mateix va simpatitzar amb Lenin al final de la seva vida. Es al corpus perque es una peca real de la historia de les idees, i s'ha de llegir sabent on va anar a parar.
Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.
My dear Halevy — I should doubtless have left these studies buried in the bound volumes of a review if some friends, whose judgment I value, had not. thought that it would be a good thing to bring them before the notice of a wider public, as they serve to make better known one of the most singular social phenomena that history records. But it seemed to me that it would be necessary to give this public some additional explanations, since I cannot often expect to find judges as indulgent as you have been. When I published, in the Mouvement Socialiste, the articles which are now collected in this volume, I did not write with the intention of composing a book : I simply wrote down my reflections as they came into my mind. I knew that the subscribers to that review would have no difficulty in following me, since they were already famiHar with the theories, which for some years my friends and I had developed in its pages. But I am convinced that the readers of this book, on the contrary, will be very bewildered if I do not submit a kind of defence which will enable them to consider things from my own habitual point of view. In the course of our conversations, you have sometimes made remarks which fitted so well into the system of my own ideas that they often led me to investigate certain questions more thoroughly. I am sure that the reflections which I here submit to you, and which you have provoked, will be very useful to those who wish to read this book with profit. There are perhaps few studies in which the defects of my method of writing are more evident ; I have been frequently reproached for not respecting the rules of the art of writing, to which all our contemporaries submit, and for thus inconveniencing my readers by the disorder of my explanations. I have tried to render the text clearer by numerous corrections of detail, but I have not been able to make the disorder disappear.…