Crítica de la raó pura
- Idioma:
- anglès
- Completesa:
- Obra completa
- Autoria:
- Escrita per l'autor
- Estat del text:
- Sense soroll d'escaneig detectat (mesura automàtica sobre tot el text, no revisada a mà)
- Extensió:
- ~230.000 paraules · 1.082 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
- APAImmanuel Kant. (n.d.). The Critique of Pure Reason [Crítica de la raó pura]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/immanuel-kant/the-critique-of-pure-reason
- MLAImmanuel Kant. The Critique of Pure Reason [Crítica de la raó pura]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/immanuel-kant/the-critique-of-pure-reason.
- ChicagoImmanuel Kant. The Critique of Pure Reason [Crítica de la raó pura]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/immanuel-kant/the-critique-of-pure-reason.
Referència de l’edició reproduïda. SigPhi és la reproducció digital, no l’editor. S’hi inclouen l’any, l’editorial i el traductor quan consten; «n.d.» indica que no consta l’any. La responsabilitat d’un pròleg o d’una nota es determina segons el passatge citat.
De què tracta
La pregunta de si el coneixement pot anar més enllà de l'experiència, i la resposta que no: l'espai, el temps i les categories són la nostra manera de rebre el món, no propietats del món en si.
Context i història
N'hi ha dues edicions, la del 1781 i la del 1787, i no diuen ben bé el mateix: Kant va reescriure la deducció transcendental i va refer la crítica de la psicologia racional. Per això es cita per pàgina «A» i «B» segons l'edició, i les traduccions serioses marquen les dues numeracions al marge. Si una citació de la Crítica no porta A o B, no es pot anar a comprovar.
Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.
Time was, when she was the _queen_ of all the sciences; and, if we take the will for the deed, she certainly deserves, so far as regards the high importance of her object-matter, this title of honour. Now, it is the fashion of the time to heap contempt and scorn upon her; and the matron mourns, forlorn and forsaken, like Hecuba: Modo maxima rerum, Tot generis, natisque potens... Nunc trahor exul, inops. —Ovid, Metamorphoses. xiii At first, her government, under the administration of the _dogmatists_, was an absolute _despotism_. But, as the legislative continued to show traces of the ancient barbaric rule, her empire gradually broke up, and intestine wars introduced the reign of _anarchy;_ while the _sceptics_, like nomadic tribes, who hate a permanent habitation and settled mode of living, attacked from time to time those who had organized themselves into civil communities. But their number was, very happily, small; and thus they could not entirely put a stop to the exertions of those who persisted in raising new edifices, although on no settled or uniform plan. In recent times the hope dawned upon us of seeing those disputes settled, and the legitimacy of her claims established by a kind of _physiology_ of the human understanding—that of the celebrated Locke. But it was found that—although it was affirmed that this so-called queen could not refer her descent to any higher source than that of common experience, a circumstance which necessarily brought suspicion on her claims—as this _genealogy_ was incorrect, she persisted in the advancement of her claims to sovereignty. Thus metaphysics necessarily fell back into the antiquated and rotten constitution of _dogmatism_, and again became obnoxious to the contempt from which efforts had been made to save it.…