Sutres jainistes II: Uttarādhyayana i Sūtrakṛtāṅga
- Idioma:
- anglès
- Traducció:
- Hermann Jacobi
- Completesa:
- Selecció o obra parcial
- Autoria:
- Anònima o composta
- Estat del text:
- Amb errors d'escaneig (mesura automàtica sobre tot el text, no revisada a mà) · 32 passatges il·legibles, exclosos de les respostes
- Extensió:
- ~140.000 paraules · 686 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
- APASutres jainistes. (n.d.). Jaina Sutras, Part II: Uttaradhyayana and Sutrakritanga (SBE XLV) [Sutres jainistes II: Uttarādhyayana i Sūtrakṛtāṅga] (Hermann Jacobi, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/jaina-sutras/jaina-sutras-part-ii-uttaradhyayana-and-sutrakritanga-sbe-xlv
- MLASutres jainistes. Jaina Sutras, Part II: Uttaradhyayana and Sutrakritanga (SBE XLV) [Sutres jainistes II: Uttarādhyayana i Sūtrakṛtāṅga]. Translated by Hermann Jacobi. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/jaina-sutras/jaina-sutras-part-ii-uttaradhyayana-and-sutrakritanga-sbe-xlv.
- ChicagoSutres jainistes. Jaina Sutras, Part II: Uttaradhyayana and Sutrakritanga (SBE XLV) [Sutres jainistes II: Uttarādhyayana i Sūtrakṛtāṅga]. Translated by Hermann Jacobi. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/jaina-sutras/jaina-sutras-part-ii-uttaradhyayana-and-sutrakritanga-sbe-xlv.
Referència de l’edició reproduïda. SigPhi és la reproducció digital, no l’editor. S’hi inclouen l’any, l’editorial i el traductor quan consten; «n.d.» indica que no consta l’any. La responsabilitat d’un pròleg o d’una nota es determina segons el passatge citat.
De què tracta
La segona part dels textos jainistes traduits per Hermann Jacobi per als «Sacred Books of the East»: l'Uttaradhyayana i el Sutrakritanga.
Context i història
El jainisme es una de les tradicions religioses vives mes antigues de l'India, contemporania del budisme i independent d'ell. L'Uttaradhyayana es un recull d'ensenyaments en vers, tradicionalment tingut per les ultimes paraules de Mahavira, i inclou narracions i dialegs; el Sutrakritanga es mes doctrinal i esta dedicat en bona part a exposar i refutar les doctrines rivals de l'època, cosa que el fa una font historica de primer ordre per a saber que es pensava a l'India al segle V aC. Els dos conceptes centrals son l'ahimsa —la no-violencia radical, estesa a tot esser viu— i l'anekantavada, la tesi que la realitat te molts aspectes i que cap afirmacio unilateral no la capta sencera. La primera part es al corpus a part.
Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.
the Uttaradhyayana, Lecture XXIII, how the union of the old and the new church was effected, is of much interest in this respect. Kesi and Gautama, the representatives and leaders of the two branches of the 6"aina church, both at the head of their pupils, meet in a park near 5ravasti ; the differences in their creed concerning the number of great vows, and the use or disuse of clothes are explained away without further discussion, and full harmony with regard to the fundamental ethical ideas is satisfactorily established by the readiness with which allegorical expressions of the one speaker are understood and explained by the other. There seems to have been some estrangement, but no hostility between the two branches of the church ; and though the members of the older branch invariably are made to adopt the Law of Mahavira, ' which enjoins five vows,' it may be imagined that they continued in some of their old practices, especially with regard to the use of clothes, which Mahavira had abandoned. On this assumption we can account for the division of the church in 5vetambaras and Digambaras, about the origin of which both sects have contradictory legends^. There was apparently no sudden rupture; but an original diversity (such as e. g. subsists now between the several Gakk/ias of the ^vetambaras) ripened into division, and in the end brought about the great schism. The records in the Buddhist Canon are not repugnant to our views about the existence of the Niga;///^as before Nataputta; for the Nigaw/Z/as must have been an important sect at the time when Buddhism took its rise. This may be inferred from the fact that they are so frequently mentioned in the Pi/akas as opponents or converts of Buddha and his disciples ; and as it is nowhere said or even merely implied that the Niga«//^as were a newly-founded sect, we may conclude that they had already existed a considerable time before the advent of the Buddha.…