SigPhiSigPhi

Sobre el sistema anivellador

Jeremy Bentham

Idioma:
anglès
Completesa:
Obra completa
Autoria:
Escrita per l'autor
Estat del text:
Sense soroll d'escaneig detectat (mesura automàtica sobre tot el text, no revisada a mà)
Extensió:
~7.160 paraules · 34 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
  • APAJeremy Bentham. (n.d.). Of the Levelling System [Sobre el sistema anivellador]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/jeremy-bentham/of-the-levelling-system
  • MLAJeremy Bentham. Of the Levelling System [Sobre el sistema anivellador]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/jeremy-bentham/of-the-levelling-system.
  • ChicagoJeremy Bentham. Of the Levelling System [Sobre el sistema anivellador]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/jeremy-bentham/of-the-levelling-system.

Referència de l'edició que reprodueix SigPhi: SigPhi n'és la reproducció digital, no l'editor. L'any de l'edició no consta a les metadades (per això «n.d.») i el traductor només hi surt quan consta.

De què tracta

«Del sistema anivellador»: sobre la igualació de les fortunes.

Context i història

Bentham hi discuteix si repartir la riquesa augmenta la felicitat total. La resposta té dues cares que se solen citar per separat: sí, perquè el mateix diner val més per a qui en té poc; però no si això destrueix la seguretat de la propietat, que ell considera la condició de tota la resta.

Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.

Com comença
many thousands of pounds to lend, so many thousands more than they have need to employ otherwise. Upon the equalisation scheme, all these monied men would be no more: nobody would have any thing he could spare for any length of time, much less for ever; no man would have any thing but from hand to mouth. As to the gainers — (I speak always of the immediate and momentary gainers, for ultimately, as we shall see, there would scarcely be a real gainer left in the nation) — as to the real gainers, if they were to be looked for any where, it would be in the class of the present day-labourers in husbandry. Their employment need not be changed; they would continue labourers in husbandry, with this comfortable difference, as it would be thought, of labouring upon, and for the benefit of their own property, instead of other people's. But even these would for the most part gain nothing but ruin by the change. Their fragments of farms having no buildings on them, would be useless to them till buildings could be erected. A man might farm profitably, and live comfortably a year or two hence, if he were then alive: but in the meantime he would not be able to farm or live at all. The immense multitude of new created farms, all of them without buildings, would require an immense and instant multiplication of the number of workmen concerned in building. But this number, instead of being multiplied, or so much as increased, would be as immediately and permanently reduced: for they too would have their portions, as well as the labourers in husbandry: if they laboured any longer, it would be upon their own property, not upon other people’s. If they laboured at all, what inducement would they have to labour upon other peoples property, or indeed for other people? What would they get by it? an

Llegeix l'obra sencera →

← Torna a Jeremy Bentham