Epistemologia (ed. 2)
- Idioma:
- anglès
- Completesa:
- Obra completa
- Autoria:
- Escrita per l'autor
- Estat del text:
- Sense soroll d'escaneig detectat (mesura automàtica sobre tot el text, no revisada a mà)
- Extensió:
- ~15.200 paraules · 72 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
- APAJohann Fichte. (n.d.). Concerning the Conception of the Science of Knowledge Generally [Epistemologia (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/johann-fichte/concerning-the-conception-of-the-science-of-knowledge-generally
- MLAJohann Fichte. Concerning the Conception of the Science of Knowledge Generally [Epistemologia (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/johann-fichte/concerning-the-conception-of-the-science-of-knowledge-generally.
- ChicagoJohann Fichte. Concerning the Conception of the Science of Knowledge Generally [Epistemologia (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/johann-fichte/concerning-the-conception-of-the-science-of-knowledge-generally.
Referència de l’edició reproduïda. SigPhi és la reproducció digital, no l’editor. S’hi inclouen l’any, l’editorial i el traductor quan consten; «n.d.» indica que no consta l’any. La responsabilitat d’un pròleg o d’una nota es determina segons el passatge citat.
De què tracta
«Sobre el concepte de la doctrina de la ciència» (1794): el programa del sistema, abans del sistema.
Context i història
Fichte va publicar aquest opuscle per anunciar què es proposava de fer: una filosofia deduïda sencera d'un sol principi, l'activitat del jo. És la porta d'entrada a la «Wissenschaftslehre», que ell va reescriure una dotzena de vegades sense acabar-la mai a gust seu. Traducció anglesa antiga. Al catàleg també hi ha obres de Fichte en alemany; l'original és el que s'ha de citar.
Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.
No proposition is possible without content or without form. It must contain something whereof we know, and something which is known thereof. Hence, the first principle of the science of knowledge must have both content and form. Now, this first principle is to be immediately and of itself certain, and this can only signify: its content must determine its form, and its form its content. Its form can only fit its content, and its content can only fit its form; every other form connected with that content, or every other content connected with that form, would cancel that principle itself, and thus annihilate all knowledge. Hence, the form of the absolute first principle of the science of knowledge is not only contained in that principle itself, but is also presented as absolutely valid for the content of that principle. Again: if there should be, besides this absolute first principle, still other fundamental principles of the science of knowledge—which in that case can only be partly absolute, and must be partly derived from the first principle, since otherwise in the first case they would not be fundamental principles, and in the latter case not connected with the first and highest principle—then the absolute part of these other fundamental principles could only be either the content or the form; and, likewise, the conditioned or derived part of these principles could only be either the content or the form. If the content of these other fundamental principles be their absolute or unconditioned part, then the absolute first principle of the science of knowledge must condition the form of those contents; or if the form of those other principles be the unconditioned part, then their content must be conditioned by the first principle of the science of knowledge; and thus indirectly also their form, that is, in so far as the form is to be form of the content.…