Estudis de teoria lògica
- Idioma:
- anglès
- Completesa:
- Obra completa
- Autoria:
- Escrita per l'autor
- Estat del text:
- Text net
- Extensió:
- ~140.000 paraules · 684 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
- APAJohn Dewey. (n.d.). Estudis de teoria lògica. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/john-dewey/studies-in-logical-theory
- MLAJohn Dewey. "Estudis de teoria lògica." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/john-dewey/studies-in-logical-theory.
- ChicagoJohn Dewey. Estudis de teoria lògica. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/john-dewey/studies-in-logical-theory.
De què tracta
El volum col·lectiu del 1903 amb què Dewey i els seus col·legues de Chicago van presentar la seva manera d'entendre el pensament: no com un mirall del mon sino com una eina per sortir d'una dificultat.
Context i història
Dewey hi signa quatre assaigs i la resta son dels seus deixebles; el llibre va crear el que es va conèixer com l'«escola de Chicago» del pragmatisme. La tesi es que la logica no ha d'estudiar formes eternes sino la investigacio real: el pensament comenca quan una situacio es fa problematica, formula hipotesis, les prova i acaba quan la situacio torna a ser practicable. La veritat, en aquest esquema, no es una correspondencia sino el resultat d'una investigacio ben feta. William James va saludar el llibre com la maduresa del pragmatisme; Russell hi va veure una confusio entre saber i actuar. La discussio continua a «Assaigs de logica experimental», tambe al corpus.
Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.
This volume presents some results of the work done in the matter of logical theory in the Department of Philosophy of the University of Chicago in the first decade of its existence. The eleven Studies are the work of eight different hands, all, with the exception of the editor, having at some period held Fellowships in this University, Dr. Heidel in Greek, the others in Philosophy. Their names and present pursuits are indicated in the Table of Contents. The editor has occasionally, though rarely, added a footnote or phrase which might serve to connect one Study more closely with another. The pages in the discussion of Hypothesis, on Mill and Whewell, are by him. With these exceptions, each writer is individually and completely responsible for his own Study. The various Studies present, the editor believes, about the relative amount of agreement and disagreement that is natural in view of the conditions of their origin. The various writers have been in contact with one another in Seminars and lecture courses in pursuit of the same topics, and have had to do with shaping one another's views. There are several others, not represented in this volume, who have also participated in the evolution of the point of view herein set forth, and to whom the writers acknowledge their indebtedness. The disagreements proceed from the diversity of interests with which the different writers approach the logical topic; and from the fact that the point of view in question is still (happily) developing and showing no signs of becoming a closed system. If the Studies themselves do not give a fair notion of the nature and degree of the harmony in the different writers' methods, a preface is not likely to succeed in so doing. A few words may be in place, however, about a matter repeatedly touched upon, but nowhere consecutively elaborated--the more ultimate philosophical bearing of what is set forth.…