SigPhiSigPhi

El món com a voluntat i representació (II)

Arthur Schopenhauer

Idioma:
anglès
Completesa:
Obra completa
Autoria:
Escrita per l'autor
Estat del text:
Sense soroll d'escaneig detectat (mesura automàtica sobre tot el text, no revisada a mà)
Extensió:
~180.000 paraules · 862 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
  • APAArthur Schopenhauer. (n.d.). The World as Will and Idea (Vol. 2 of 3) [El món com a voluntat i representació (II)]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/schopenhauer/the-world-as-will-and-idea-vol-2-of-3
  • MLAArthur Schopenhauer. The World as Will and Idea (Vol. 2 of 3) [El món com a voluntat i representació (II)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/schopenhauer/the-world-as-will-and-idea-vol-2-of-3.
  • ChicagoArthur Schopenhauer. The World as Will and Idea (Vol. 2 of 3) [El món com a voluntat i representació (II)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/schopenhauer/the-world-as-will-and-idea-vol-2-of-3.

Referència de l'edició que reprodueix SigPhi: SigPhi n'és la reproducció digital, no l'editor. L'any de l'edició no consta a les metadades (per això «n.d.») i el traductor només hi surt quan consta.

De què tracta

El segon tom: la continuació de l'obra, amb el pas del món com a representació al món com a voluntat.

Context i història

Aquesta traducció anglesa reparteix en tres toms el que en alemany són dos volums: el llibre del 1818 i el volum de complements que Schopenhauer hi va afegir el 1844, vint-i-sis anys després. Els complements no són apèndixs menors: ocupen tant com l'obra original i sovint s'hi llegeixen millor les seves idees, perquè hi escriu ja sense haver de convèncer ningú de l'estructura. Ell mateix demanava que el conjunt es llegís dues vegades.

Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.

Com comença
of the general public was aroused. Induced by this, but not urged by inward inclination and sense of power (which find utterance even at unfavourable times, as in the case of Spinoza), men without any exceptional talent made various weak, absurd, and indeed sometimes insane, attempts, to which, however, the now interested public gave its attention, and with great patience, such as is only found in Germany, long lent its ear. The same thing must once have happened in Nature, when a great revolution had altered the whole surface of the earth, land and sea had changed places, and the scene was cleared for a new creation. It was then a long time before Nature could produce a new series of lasting forms all in harmony with themselves and with each other. Strange and monstrous organisations appeared which did not harmonise either with themselves or with each other, and therefore could not endure long, but whose still existing remains have brought down to us the tokens of that wavering and tentative procedure of Nature forming itself anew. Since, now, in philosophy, a crisis precisely similar to this, and an age of fearful abortions, was, as we all know, introduced by Kant, it may be concluded that the services he rendered were not complete, but must have been negative and one-sided, and burdened with great defects. These defects we now desire to search out. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ First of all we shall present to ourselves clearly and examine the fundamental thought in which the aim of the whole “Critique of Pure Reason” lies. Kant placed himself at the standpoint of his predecessors, the dogmatic philosophers, and accordingly he started with them from the following assumptions:—(1.) Metaphysics is the science of that which lies beyond the possibility of all experience. (2.…

Llegeix l'obra sencera →

← Torna a Arthur Schopenhauer