Resistance to Civil Government (Civil Disobedience)
- Idioma:
- anglès
- Completesa:
- Obra completa
- Autoria:
- Escrita per l'autor
- Estat del text:
- Sense soroll d'escaneig detectat (mesura automàtica sobre tot el text, no revisada a mà)
- Extensió:
- ~10.700 paraules · 51 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
- APAHenry David Thoreau. (n.d.). Resistance to Civil Government (Civil Disobedience). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/thoreau/resistance-to-civil-government-civil-disobedience
- MLAHenry David Thoreau. Resistance to Civil Government (Civil Disobedience). Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/thoreau/resistance-to-civil-government-civil-disobedience.
- ChicagoHenry David Thoreau. Resistance to Civil Government (Civil Disobedience). Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/thoreau/resistance-to-civil-government-civil-disobedience.
Referència de l’edició reproduïda. SigPhi és la reproducció digital, no l’editor. S’hi inclouen l’any, l’editorial i el traductor quan consten; «n.d.» indica que no consta l’any. La responsabilitat d’un pròleg o d’una nota es determina segons el passatge citat.
De què tracta
«Resistència al govern civil» (1849), amb el títol original.
Context i història
Thoreau va passar una nit a la presó per no pagar un impost que finançava l'esclavitud i la guerra contra Mèxic, i en va sortir aquest assaig. El títol d'aquí és el de debò: «Desobediència civil» és el nom que li van posar després de morir ell, i és el que ha fet fortuna. Gandhi el va llegir a Sud-àfrica i Martin Luther King a la universitat.
Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.
The broadest and most prevalent error requires the most disinterested virtue to sustain it. The slight reproach to which the virtue of patriotism is commonly liable, the noble are most likely to incur. Those who, while they disapprove of the character and measures of a government, yield to it their allegiance and support, are undoubtedly its most conscientious supporters, and so frequently the most serious obstacles to reform. Some are petitioning the State to dissolve the Union, to disregard the requisitions of the President. Why do they not dissolve it themselves,—the union between themselves and the State,—and refuse to pay their quota into its treasury? Do not they stand in the same relation to the State, that the State does to the Union? And have not the same reasons prevented the State from resisting the Union, which have prevented them from resisting the State? How can a man be satisfied to entertain an opinion merely, and enjoy it? Is there any enjoyment in it, if his opinion is that he is aggrieved? If you are cheated out of a single dollar by your neighbor, you do not rest satisfied with knowing that you are cheated, or with saying that you are cheated, or even with petitioning him to pay you your due; but you take effectual steps at once to obtain the full amount, and see that you are never cheated again. Action from principle,—the perception and the performance of right,—changes things and relations; it is essentially revolutionary, and does not consist wholly with any thing which was. It not only divides states and churches, it divides families; aye, it divides the individual, separating the diabolical in him from the divine.