SigPhiSigPhi

Diccionari filosòfic, volum 03

Voltaire

⚠️ Avís de contingut

Idioma:
anglès
Completesa:
Obra completa
Autoria:
Escrita per l'autor
Estat del text:
Sense soroll d'escaneig detectat (mesura automàtica sobre tot el text, no revisada a mà)
Extensió:
~81.100 paraules · 385 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
  • APAVoltaire. (n.d.). A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 03 [Diccionari filosòfic, volum 03]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-03
  • MLAVoltaire. A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 03 [Diccionari filosòfic, volum 03]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-03.
  • ChicagoVoltaire. A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 03 [Diccionari filosòfic, volum 03]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-03.

Referència de l'edició que reprodueix SigPhi: SigPhi n'és la reproducció digital, no l'editor. L'any de l'edició no consta a les metadades (per això «n.d.») i el traductor només hi surt quan consta.

De què tracta

Volum 3 de deu del «Diccionari filosòfic». Bacchus – Chinese Catechism. El catecisme xinès és un diàleg sencer, no un article.

Context i història

El format és l'argument: un diccionari es consulta, no es llegeix seguit, i això el feia impossible de refutar en bloc i fàcil de fer circular clandestinament. Voltaire el va publicar anònimament el 1764 i el van cremar a Ginebra i a París. Avís d'edició: al catàleg hi ha DUES edicions del «Diccionari filosòfic» — aquesta en deu volums i una altra en un de sol, «Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary». No són cap duplicat: són tries i traduccions diferents, i els articles no s'hi corresponen un a un. L'original és francès.

Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.

Com comença
which is worse, on pretence of piety and religion?" What a question for a philosopher like Montaigne! Then, if Anacreon and Tibullus had been Iroquois, they would have eaten men! Alas! alas! SECTION III. Well; two Englishmen have sailed round the world. They have discovered that New Holland is an island larger than Europe, and that men still eat one another there, as in New Zealand. Whence come this race? supposing that they exist. Are they descended from the ancient Egyptians, from the ancient people of Ethiopia, from the Africans, from the Indians--or from the vultures, or the wolves? What a contrast between Marcus Aurelius, or Epictetus, and the cannibals of New Zealand! Yet they have the same organs, they are alike human beings. We have already treated on this property of the human race; it may not be amiss to add another paragraph. The following are St. Jerome's own words in one of his letters: _"Quid loquar de cæteris nationibus, quum ipse adolescentulus in Gallia viderim Scotos, gentem Britannicam, humanis vesci carnibus, et quum per silvas porcorum greges pecudumque reperiant, tamen pastorum nates et fæminarum papillas solere abscindere et has solas ciborum delicias arbitrari?"_--What shall I say of other nations; when I myself, when young, have seen Scotchmen in Gaul, who, though they might have fed on swine and other animals of the forest, chose rather to cut off the posteriors of the youths and the breasts of the young women, and considered them as the most delicious food." Pelloutier, who sought for everything that might do honor to the Celts, took the pains to contradict Jerome, and to maintain that his credulity had been imposed on. But Jerome speaks very gravely, and of what he _saw_. We may, with deference, dispute with a father of the church about what he has heard; but to doubt of what he has _seen_ is going very far. After all, the safest way is to doubt of everything, even of what we have seen ourselves.…

Llegeix l'obra sencera →

← Torna a Voltaire