Diccionari filosòfic (VII)
⚠️ Avís de contingut
- Idioma:
- anglès
- Traducció:
- William F. Fleming
- Completesa:
- Selecció o obra parcial
- Autoria:
- Escrita per l'autor
- Estat del text:
- Sense soroll d'escaneig detectat (mesura automàtica sobre tot el text, no revisada a mà)
- Extensió:
- ~77.700 paraules · 369 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
- APAVoltaire. (n.d.). A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07 [Diccionari filosòfic (VII)] (William F. Fleming, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-07
- MLAVoltaire. A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07 [Diccionari filosòfic (VII)]. Translated by William F. Fleming. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-07.
- ChicagoVoltaire. A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07 [Diccionari filosòfic (VII)]. Translated by William F. Fleming. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-07.
Referència de l’edició reproduïda. SigPhi és la reproducció digital, no l’editor. S’hi inclouen l’any, l’editorial i el traductor quan consten; «n.d.» indica que no consta l’any. La responsabilitat d’un pròleg o d’una nota es determina segons el passatge citat.
De què tracta
Volum 7 de deu del «Diccionari filosòfic». Ignorance – Laws. Els articles sobre les lleis i la justícia.
Context i història
El format és l'argument: un diccionari es consulta, no es llegeix seguit, i això el feia impossible de refutar en bloc i fàcil de fer circular clandestinament. Voltaire el va publicar anònimament el 1764 i el van cremar a Ginebra i a París. Avís d'edició: al catàleg hi ha DUES edicions del «Diccionari filosòfic» — aquesta en deu volums i una altra en un de sol, «Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary». No són cap duplicat: són tries i traduccions diferents, i els articles no s'hi corresponen un a un. L'original és francès.
Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.
Perhaps, by attending a little to the progress of his life, and the nature of his character, we may discover what it was that inspired him with so strong an aversion to Christianity. The emperor Constantine, his great-uncle, who had placed the new religion on the throne, was stained by the murder of his wife, his son, his brother-inlaw, his nephew, and his father-in-law. The three children of Constantine began their bloody and baleful reign, with murdering their uncle and their cousins. From that time followed a series of civil wars and murders. The father, the brother, and all the relations of Julian, and even Julian himself, were marked down for destruction by Constantius, his uncle. He escaped this general massacre, but the first years of his life were passed in exile, and he at last owed the preservation of his life, his fortune, and the title of Cæsar, only to Eusebia, the wife of his uncle Constantius, who, after having had the cruelty to proscribe his infancy, had the imprudence to appoint him Cæsar, and the still further and greater imprudence of then persecuting him. He was, in the first instance, a witness of the insolence with which a certain bishop treated his benefactress Eusebia. He was called Leontius, and was bishop of Tripoli. He sent information to the empress, "that he would not visit her unless she would consent to receive him in a manner corresponding to his episcopal dignity--that is, that she should advance to receive him at the door, that she should receive his benediction in a bending attitude, and that she should remain standing until he granted her permission to be seated." The Pagan pontiffs were not in the habit of treating princesses precisely in this manner, and such brutal arrogance could not but make a deep impression on the mind of a young man attached at once to philosophy and simplicity.