The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature
- Idioma:
- anglès
- Completesa:
- Obra completa
- Autoria:
- Escrita per l'autor
- Estat del text:
- Sense soroll d'escaneig detectat (mesura automàtica sobre tot el text, no revisada a mà)
- Extensió:
- ~200.000 paraules · 952 passatges
Cita aquesta obra
- APAWilliam James. (n.d.). The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/william-james/the-varieties-of-religious-experience-a-study-in-human-nature
- MLAWilliam James. The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/william-james/the-varieties-of-religious-experience-a-study-in-human-nature.
- ChicagoWilliam James. The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ca/works/william-james/the-varieties-of-religious-experience-a-study-in-human-nature.
Referència de l’edició reproduïda. SigPhi és la reproducció digital, no l’editor. S’hi inclouen l’any, l’editorial i el traductor quan consten; «n.d.» indica que no consta l’any. La responsabilitat d’un pròleg o d’una nota es determina segons el passatge citat.
De què tracta
Les conferències Gifford de James, del 1901-1902: un estudi de la conversió, la santedat, el misticisme i l'ànima malalta a partir de testimonis de primera mà.
Context i història
El criteri de selecció és el que fa el llibre. James decideix mirar només l'experiència personal —el que li passa a algú quan està sol— i deixar de banda les institucions, els dogmes i les esglésies; ell mateix admet que és una tria que deixa fora molta cosa. També tria els casos extrems en comptes dels corrents, perquè diu que en el cas extrem el fenomen es veu millor. Ho declara obertament, i per això el llibre es pot discutir sabent exactament què s'hi ha inclòs i què no.
Context editorial, no una font citable: a diferència dels passatges de l'obra, aquestes dades no es poden contrastar amb el corpus.
religious feelings and religious impulses must be its subject, and I must confine myself to those more developed subjective phenomena recorded in literature produced by articulate and fully self‐conscious men, in works of piety and autobiography. Interesting as the origins and early stages of a subject always are, yet when one seeks earnestly for its full significance, one must always look to its more completely evolved and perfect forms. It follows from this that the documents that will most concern us will be those of the men who were most accomplished in the religious life and best able to give an intelligible account of their ideas and motives. These men, of course, are either comparatively modern writers, or else such earlier ones as have become religious classics. The _documents humains_ which we shall find most instructive need not then be sought for in the haunts of special erudition—they lie along the beaten highway; and this circumstance, which flows so naturally from the character of our problem, suits admirably also your lecturer’s lack of special theological learning. I may take my citations, my sentences and paragraphs of personal confession, from books that most of you at some time will have had already in your hands, and yet this will be no detriment to the value of my conclusions. It is true that some more adventurous reader and investigator, lecturing here in future, may unearth from the shelves of libraries documents that will make a more delectable and curious entertainment to listen to than mine. Yet I doubt whether he will necessarily, by his control of so much more out‐of‐the‐way material, get much closer to the essence of the matter in hand. The question, What are the religious propensities? and the question, What is their philosophic significance?…