SigPhiSigPhi

Die von Anarchisten verteidigte Anarchie

Emma Goldman

Sprache:
Englisch
Status:
Vollständiges Werk
Autorschaft:
Vom Autor verfasst
Zustand des Textes:
Sauberer Text
Umfang:
~1.470 Wörter · 7 Passagen
Dieses Werk zitieren
  • APAEmma Goldman. (n.d.). Die von Anarchisten verteidigte Anarchie. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/emma-goldman/anarchy-defended-by-anarchists
  • MLAEmma Goldman. "Die von Anarchisten verteidigte Anarchie." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/de/works/emma-goldman/anarchy-defended-by-anarchists.
  • ChicagoEmma Goldman. Die von Anarchisten verteidigte Anarchie. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/emma-goldman/anarchy-defended-by-anarchists.

Wovon es handelt

Ein früher Zeitungsdialog (1896), in dem Goldman und Johann Most den Anarchismus vor der Öffentlichkeit verteidigen.

Kontext und Geschichte

Ein Stück Jugend und Volksaufklärung: interessant vor allem dafür, wie man den Anarchismus den Lesern einer Massenzeitung erklärte, zehn Jahre nach Haymarket. Dies ist ein kurzer Artikel, kein Buch: seine Größe im Katalog ist kein Mangel der Kopie. Ein guter Teil von Goldmans Werk hatte diese Form, in ihrer Zeitschrift Mother Earth und in Broschüren.

Redaktioneller Kontext, keine zitierfähige Quelle: anders als die Passagen des Werks lassen sich diese Angaben nicht am Korpus überprüfen.

Wie es beginnt
To most Americans Anarchy is an evil-sounding word -- another name for wickedness, perversity, and chaos. Anarchists are looked upon as a herd of uncombed, unwashed, and vile ruffians, bent on killing the rich and dividing their capital. Anarchy, however, to its followers actually signifies a social theory which regards the union of order with the absence of all government of man by man; in short, it means perfect individual liberty. If the meaning of Anarchy has so far been interpreted as a state of the greatest disorder, it is because people have been taught that their affairs are regulated, that they are ruled wisely, and that authority is a necessity. In by-gone centuries any person who asserted that mankind could get along without the aid of worldly and spiritual authority was considered a madman, and was either placed in a lunatic asylum or burned at the stake; whereas to-day hundreds of thousands of men and women are infidels who scorn the idea of a supernatural Being. The freethinkers of to-day, for instance, still believe in the necessity of the State, which protects society; they do not desire to know the history of our barbarian institutions. They do not understand that government did not and cannot exist without oppression; that every government has committed dark deeds and great crimes against society. The development of government has been in the order, despotism, monarchy, oligarchy, plutocracy; but it has always been a tyranny. It cannot be denied that there are a large number of wise and well-meaning people who are anxious to better the present conditions, but they have not sufficiently emancipated themselves from the prejudices and superstitions of the dark ages to understand the true inwardness of the institution called government. "How can we get along without government?" ask these people. "If our government is bad let us try to have a good one, but we must have government by all means!…

Das ganze Werk lesen →

← Zurück zu Emma Goldman