SigPhiSigPhi

Lob der Torheit (ed. 2)

Erasmus von Rotterdam

Sprache:
Englisch
Status:
Vollständiges Werk
Autorschaft:
Vom Autor verfasst
Zustand des Textes:
Kein Scanrauschen festgestellt (automatische Messung über den ganzen Text, nicht von Hand geprüft)
Umfang:
~36.800 Wörter · 175 Passagen
Dieses Werk zitieren
  • APAErasmus von Rotterdam. (n.d.). The Praise of Folly [Lob der Torheit (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/erasmus/the-praise-of-folly
  • MLAErasmus von Rotterdam. The Praise of Folly [Lob der Torheit (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/de/works/erasmus/the-praise-of-folly.
  • ChicagoErasmus von Rotterdam. The Praise of Folly [Lob der Torheit (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/erasmus/the-praise-of-folly.

Nachweis der wiedergegebenen Ausgabe. SigPhi ist die digitale Reproduktion. Jahr, Verlag und Übersetzer werden angegeben, soweit bekannt; „n.d.“ bedeutet unbekanntes Jahr.

Wovon es handelt

Das Lob der Torheit: die ZWEITE englische Übersetzung, die der Katalog hat.

Kontext und Geschichte

Es ist dasselbe Werk wie «In Praise of Folly», in anderen Worten. Es ist kein Doppel, und beide bleiben: zwei Übersetzungen sind zwei Bücher, und die Kapitelzählung deckt sich nicht immer. Beim Zitieren sagen, welche der beiden. Eine englische Übersetzung. Das Latein des Erasmus, das zitiert werden sollte, steht im Katalog nur in der Briefanthologie.

Redaktioneller Kontext, keine zitierfähige Quelle: anders als die Passagen des Werks lassen sich diese Angaben nicht am Korpus überprüfen.

Auszug aus der verfügbaren Ausgabe
heretofore they were wont to have their shares, till in one of their angry humors they tumbled him, together with Ate, goddess of mischief, down headlong to the earth, because his wisdom, forsooth, unseasonably disturbed their happiness. Nor since that dares any mortal give him harbor, though I must confess there wanted little but that he had been received into the courts of princes, had not my companion Flattery reigned in chief there, with whom and the other there is no more correspondence than between lambs and wolves. From whence it is that the gods play the fool with the greater liberty and more content to themselves "doing all things carelessly," as says Father Homer, that is to say, without anyone to correct them. For what ridiculous stuff is there which that stump of the fig tree Priapus does not afford them? What tricks and legerdemains with which Mercury does not cloak his thefts? What buffoonery that Vulcan is not guilty of, while one with his polt-foot, another with his smutched muzzle, another with his impertinencies, he makes sport for the rest of the gods? As also that old Silenus with his country dances, Polyphemus footing time to his Cyclops hammers, the nymphs with their jigs, and satyrs with their antics; while Pan makes them all twitter with some coarse ballad, which yet they had rather hear than the Muses themselves, and chiefly when they are well whittled with nectar. Besides, what should I mention what these gods do when they are half drunk? Now by my troth, so foolish that I myself can hardly refrain laughter. But in these matters 'twere better we remembered Harpocrates, lest some eavesdropping god or other take us whispering that which Momus only has the privilege of speaking at length. And therefore, according to Homer's example, I think it high time to leave the gods to themselves, and look down a little on the earth; wherein likewise you'll find nothing frolic or fortunate that it owes not to me.…

Diese Ausgabe lesen →

← Zurück zu Erasmus von Rotterdam