The Principles of Logic
- Sprache:
- Englisch
- Status:
- Vollständiges Werk
- Autorschaft:
- Vom Autor verfasst
- Zustand des Textes:
- Sauberer Text
- Umfang:
- ~180.000 Wörter · 872 Passagen
Dieses Werk zitieren
- APAF. H. Bradley. (n.d.). The Principles of Logic. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/f-h-bradley/the-principles-of-logic
- MLAF. H. Bradley. "The Principles of Logic." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/de/works/f-h-bradley/the-principles-of-logic.
- ChicagoF. H. Bradley. The Principles of Logic. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/f-h-bradley/the-principles-of-logic.
Wovon es handelt
Bradleys erstes großes Buch: was ein Urteil wirklich ist, was ein Schluss ist und warum die Logik, die man ihn gelehrt hatte, weder das eine noch das andere erklärte.
Kontext und Geschichte
1883 erschienen, zehn Jahre vor Appearance and Reality, und hier bereitet er dessen Boden. Der Hauptangriff gilt der englischen empiristischen Überlieferung — dem Gedanken, Denken sei das Verknüpfen einzelner Vorstellungen —, und er behauptet, jedes Urteil schreibe der Wirklichkeit im Ganzen etwas zu, nicht einem herausgelösten Stück. Das Buch erschien gerade, als die moderne formale Logik in anderer Richtung entstand, und der Gegensatz beider Auffassungen davon, was Logik sei, macht seine fortdauernde Lektüre lohnend.
Redaktioneller Kontext, keine zitierfähige Quelle: anders als die Passagen des Werks lassen sich diese Angaben nicht am Korpus überprüfen.
IT is with mixed feelings that this reissue of an old work is offered to the public. I am happy to find that a book of mine is still alive, and that after some forty years it has seemed worthy to reappear. On the other hand I regret that, while Logic during this interval has lived and moved, I myself have failed, except partially, to follow its advance. My available energy has been expended mainly in fields which more or less fall outside Logic proper. And it is too late for me now to make good my shortcoming, and to endeavour to master those more recent works which have succeeded in throwing, at the lowest estimate, much light on their subject. Hence I could not rewrite my book so as to offer it as an adequate account of contemporary Logic. And on the other hand simply to reprint it, or again, so far as I am concerned, to let it die, seemed alike open to objection. I therefore de cided, while reissuing the old volume, to add to it some notes and an appendix with a view to correct and supplement some part of its defects. At the same time I saw clearly that any such addition would still leave the book largely incomplete. The course which I have followed may even perhaps result in some gain to the reader.…