Erkenntnistheorie (ed. 2)
- Sprache:
- Englisch
- Status:
- Vollständiges Werk
- Autorschaft:
- Vom Autor verfasst
- Zustand des Textes:
- Kein Scanrauschen festgestellt (automatische Messung über den ganzen Text, nicht von Hand geprüft)
- Umfang:
- ~15.200 Wörter · 72 Passagen
Dieses Werk zitieren
- APAJohann Gottlieb Fichte. (n.d.). Concerning the Conception of the Science of Knowledge Generally [Erkenntnistheorie (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/johann-fichte/concerning-the-conception-of-the-science-of-knowledge-generally
- MLAJohann Gottlieb Fichte. Concerning the Conception of the Science of Knowledge Generally [Erkenntnistheorie (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/de/works/johann-fichte/concerning-the-conception-of-the-science-of-knowledge-generally.
- ChicagoJohann Gottlieb Fichte. Concerning the Conception of the Science of Knowledge Generally [Erkenntnistheorie (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/de/works/johann-fichte/concerning-the-conception-of-the-science-of-knowledge-generally.
Nachweis der wiedergegebenen Ausgabe. SigPhi ist die digitale Reproduktion. Jahr, Verlag und Übersetzer werden angegeben, soweit bekannt; „n.d.“ bedeutet unbekanntes Jahr.
Wovon es handelt
Über den Begriff der Wissenschaftslehre (1794): das Programm des Systems, vor dem System.
Kontext und Geschichte
Fichte veröffentlichte diesen kurzen Text, um anzukündigen, was er vorhatte: eine Philosophie, ganz aus einem einzigen Grundsatz abgeleitet, der Tätigkeit des Ich. Es ist der Zugang zur Wissenschaftslehre, die er ein Dutzend Mal neu geschrieben und nie zu seiner Zufriedenheit beendet hat. Eine alte englische Übersetzung. Der Katalog hat auch Fichte auf Deutsch; zitiert werden sollte das Original.
Redaktioneller Kontext, keine zitierfähige Quelle: anders als die Passagen des Werks lassen sich diese Angaben nicht am Korpus überprüfen.
No proposition is possible without content or without form. It must contain something whereof we know, and something which is known thereof. Hence, the first principle of the science of knowledge must have both content and form. Now, this first principle is to be immediately and of itself certain, and this can only signify: its content must determine its form, and its form its content. Its form can only fit its content, and its content can only fit its form; every other form connected with that content, or every other content connected with that form, would cancel that principle itself, and thus annihilate all knowledge. Hence, the form of the absolute first principle of the science of knowledge is not only contained in that principle itself, but is also presented as absolutely valid for the content of that principle. Again: if there should be, besides this absolute first principle, still other fundamental principles of the science of knowledge—which in that case can only be partly absolute, and must be partly derived from the first principle, since otherwise in the first case they would not be fundamental principles, and in the latter case not connected with the first and highest principle—then the absolute part of these other fundamental principles could only be either the content or the form; and, likewise, the conditioned or derived part of these principles could only be either the content or the form. If the content of these other fundamental principles be their absolute or unconditioned part, then the absolute first principle of the science of knowledge must condition the form of those contents; or if the form of those other principles be the unconditioned part, then their content must be conditioned by the first principle of the science of knowledge; and thus indirectly also their form, that is, in so far as the form is to be form of the content.…
Eine Frage zu diesem Werk stellenWorum geht es in Erkenntnistheorie (ed. 2)?Fassen Sie Erkenntnistheorie (ed. 2) kurz zusammenWas sind die Kernideen von Erkenntnistheorie (ed. 2)?
← Zurück zu Johann Gottlieb Fichte