SigPhiSigPhi

La anarquía defendida por los anarquistas

Emma Goldman

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Texto limpio
Extensión:
~1470 palabras · 7 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAEmma Goldman. (n.d.). La anarquía defendida por los anarquistas. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/emma-goldman/anarchy-defended-by-anarchists
  • MLAEmma Goldman. "La anarquía defendida por los anarquistas." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/emma-goldman/anarchy-defended-by-anarchists.
  • ChicagoEmma Goldman. La anarquía defendida por los anarquistas. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/emma-goldman/anarchy-defended-by-anarchists.

De qué trata

Un diálogo periodístico temprano (1896) en el que Goldman y Johann Most defienden el anarquismo ante el público general.

Contexto e historia

Pieza de juventud y de divulgación: interesa sobre todo por cómo se le explicaba el anarquismo a los lectores de un periódico de masas, diez años después de Haymarket. Es un artículo corto y no un libro: su tamaño en el catálogo no es ningún defecto de la copia. Buena parte de la obra de Goldman tuvo esta forma, en su revista Mother Earth y en folletos.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Cómo empieza
To most Americans Anarchy is an evil-sounding word -- another name for wickedness, perversity, and chaos. Anarchists are looked upon as a herd of uncombed, unwashed, and vile ruffians, bent on killing the rich and dividing their capital. Anarchy, however, to its followers actually signifies a social theory which regards the union of order with the absence of all government of man by man; in short, it means perfect individual liberty. If the meaning of Anarchy has so far been interpreted as a state of the greatest disorder, it is because people have been taught that their affairs are regulated, that they are ruled wisely, and that authority is a necessity. In by-gone centuries any person who asserted that mankind could get along without the aid of worldly and spiritual authority was considered a madman, and was either placed in a lunatic asylum or burned at the stake; whereas to-day hundreds of thousands of men and women are infidels who scorn the idea of a supernatural Being. The freethinkers of to-day, for instance, still believe in the necessity of the State, which protects society; they do not desire to know the history of our barbarian institutions. They do not understand that government did not and cannot exist without oppression; that every government has committed dark deeds and great crimes against society. The development of government has been in the order, despotism, monarchy, oligarchy, plutocracy; but it has always been a tyranny. It cannot be denied that there are a large number of wise and well-meaning people who are anxious to better the present conditions, but they have not sufficiently emancipated themselves from the prejudices and superstitions of the dark ages to understand the true inwardness of the institution called government. "How can we get along without government?" ask these people. "If our government is bad let us try to have a good one, but we must have government by all means!…

Lee la obra completa →

← Volver a Emma Goldman