SigPhiSigPhi

Mi desilusión con Rusia

Emma Goldman

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
Extensión:
~53.300 palabras · 253 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAEmma Goldman. (n.d.). My Disillusionment in Russia [Mi desilusión con Rusia]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/emma-goldman/my-disillusionment-in-russia
  • MLAEmma Goldman. My Disillusionment in Russia [Mi desilusión con Rusia]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/emma-goldman/my-disillusionment-in-russia.
  • ChicagoEmma Goldman. My Disillusionment in Russia [Mi desilusión con Rusia]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/emma-goldman/my-disillusionment-in-russia.

Referencia de la edición reproducida. SigPhi es la reproducción digital. Se incluyen año, editorial y traductor cuando constan; «n.d.» indica que no consta el año.

De qué trata

Goldman en la Rusia soviética (1920-1921): llegó deportada de Estados Unidos y partidaria de la Revolución, y se fue horrorizada.

Contexto e historia

Uno de los primeros relatos críticos del bolchevismo escritos desde la izquierda, y por eso incómodo para todos: la derecha no quería a la anarquista y la izquierda no quería la crítica. El título no es suyo sino del editor, y lo detestaba.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Extracto de la edición disponible
Revolution." Here I have in mind the sincere friends of the Russian Revolution. The work of most of them has resulted in incalculable confusion and mischief. They have helped to perpetuate the myth that the Bolsheviki and the Revolution are synonymous. Yet nothing is further from the truth. The _actual_ Russian Revolution took place in the summer months of 1917. During that period the peasants possessed themselves of the land, the workers of the factories, thus demonstrating that they knew well the meaning of social revolution. The October change was the finishing touch to the work begun six months previously. In the great uprising the Bolsheviki assumed the voice of the people. They clothed themselves with the agrarian programme of the Social Revolutionists and the industrial tactics of the Anarchists. But after the high tide of revolutionary enthusiasm had carried them into power, the Bolsheviki discarded their false plumes. It was then that began the spiritual separation between the Bolsheviki and the Russian Revolution. With each succeeding day the gap grew wider, their interests more conflicting. To-day it is no exaggeration to state that the Bolsheviki stand as the arch enemies of the Russian Revolution. Superstitions die hard. In the case of this modern superstition the process is doubly hard because various factors have combined to administer artificial respiration. International intervention, the blockade, and the very efficient world propaganda of the Communist Party have kept the Bolshevik myth alive. Even the terrible famine is being exploited to that end. How powerful a hold that superstition wields I realize from my own experience. I had always known that the Bolsheviki are Marxists. For thirty years I fought the Marxian theory as a cold, mechanistic, enslaving formula. In pamphlets, lectures, and debates I argued against it. I was therefore not unaware of what might be expected from the Bolsheviki.…

Lee esta edición →

← Volver a Emma Goldman