SigPhiSigPhi

Mi ulterior desencanto en Rusia

Emma Goldman

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
Extensión:
~39.800 palabras · 189 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAEmma Goldman. (n.d.). My further disillusionment in Russia [Mi ulterior desencanto en Rusia]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/emma-goldman/my-further-disillusionment-in-russia
  • MLAEmma Goldman. My further disillusionment in Russia [Mi ulterior desencanto en Rusia]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/emma-goldman/my-further-disillusionment-in-russia.
  • ChicagoEmma Goldman. My further disillusionment in Russia [Mi ulterior desencanto en Rusia]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/emma-goldman/my-further-disillusionment-in-russia.

Referencia de la edición que reproduce SigPhi: SigPhi es su reproducción digital, no el editor. El año de la edición no consta en los metadatos (por eso «n.d.») y el traductor solo aparece cuando consta.

De qué trata

La segunda mitad del relato ruso, que el editor norteamericano publicó por separado.

Contexto e historia

No es una obra nueva: son los capítulos finales de Mi desilusión en Rusia, cortados de la primera edición sin avisar. Contiene el epílogo, donde Goldman saca las conclusiones teóricas: una revolución no puede separar los medios de los fines.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Cómo empieza
accepted notion, the pogrom wave during the civil war period, between the years 1918 and 1921, under the various Ukrainian governments, was even worse than the most terrible Jewish massacres under the Tsars. There had taken place no pogroms during the Bolshevik régime, but he believed that the atmosphere created by them intensified the anti-Jewish spirit and would some day break out in the wholesale slaughter of the Jews. He did not think that the Bolsheviki were particularly concerned in defending his race. In certain localities of the South the Jews, constantly exposed to assault and pillage by robber bands and occasionally by individual Red soldiers, had appealed to the Soviet Government for permission to organize themselves for self-defence, requesting that arms be given them. But in all such cases the Government refused. It was the general sentiment of the Zionists that the continuation of the Bolsheviki in power meant the destruction of the Jews. The Russian Jews, as a rule, were not workers. From time immemorial they had engaged in trade; but business had been destroyed by the Communists, and before the Jew could be turned into a worker he would deteriorate, as a race, and become extinct. Specific Jewish culture, the most priceless thing to the Zionists, was frowned upon by the Bolsheviki. That phase of the situation seemed to affect them even more deeply than pogroms. These intellectual Jews were not of the proletarian class. They were bourgeois without any revolutionary spirit. Their criticism of the Bolsheviki did not appeal to me for it was a criticism from the Right. If I had still believed in the Communists as the true champions of the Revolution I could have defended them against the Zionist complaints. But I myself had lost faith in the revolutionary integrity of the Bolsheviki.…

Lee la obra completa →

← Volver a Emma Goldman