SigPhiSigPhi

La queja de la paz

Erasmo

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
Extensión:
~24.600 palabras · 117 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAErasmo. (n.d.). The Complaint of Peace [La queja de la paz]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/erasmus/the-complaint-of-peace
  • MLAErasmo. The Complaint of Peace [La queja de la paz]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/erasmus/the-complaint-of-peace.
  • ChicagoErasmo. The Complaint of Peace [La queja de la paz]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/erasmus/the-complaint-of-peace.

Referencia de la edición reproducida. SigPhi es la reproducción digital. Se incluyen año, editorial y traductor cuando constan; «n.d.» indica que no consta el año.

De qué trata

La queja de la paz (1517): la Paz en persona protesta porque la echan de todas partes.

Contexto e historia

Escrito en vísperas de las guerras de religión, por encargo de un canciller borgoñón que quería un argumento contra la guerra. Lo que sostiene Erasmo es que una guerra entre cristianos es siempre una guerra civil — el argumento que le puso medio continente en contra. Es una traducción inglesa. El latín de Erasmo, que es lo que hay que citar, solo está en el catálogo dentro de la antología de epístolas.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Extracto de la edición disponible
In living bodies, how all the various limbs harmonize, and mutually combine, for common defence against injury! What can be more heterogeneous, and unlike, than the body and the soul? and yet with what strong bonds nature has united them, is evident from the pang of separation. As life itself is nothing else but the concordant union of body and soul, so is health the harmonious cooperation of all the parts and functions of the body. Animals destitute of reason live with their own kind in a state of social amity. Elephants herd together; sheep and swine feed in flocks; cranes and crows take their flight in troops; storks have their public meetings to consult previously to their emigration, and feed their parents when unable to feed themselves; dolphins defend each other by mutual assistance; and everybody knows, that both ants and bees have respectively established by general agreement, a little friendly community. But I need dwell no longer on animals, which, though they want reason, are evidently furnished with sense. In trees and plants one may trace the vestiges of amity and love. Many of them are barren, unless the male plant is placed on their vicinity. The vine embraces the elm, and other plants cling to the vine. So that things which have no powers of sense to perceive any thing else, seem strongly to feel the advantages of union. But plants, though they have not powers of perception, yet, as they have life, certainly approach very nearly to those things which are endowed with sentient faculties. What then is so completely insensible as stony substance? yet even in this, there appears to be a desire of union. Thus the loadstone attracts iron to it, and holds it fast in its embrace, when so attracted. Indeed, the attraction of cohesion, as a law of love, takes place throughout all inanimate nature. I need not repeat, that the most savage of the savage tribes in the forest, live among each other in amity. Lions show no fierceness to the lion race.…

Lee esta edición →

← Volver a Erasmo