SigPhiSigPhi

La conquista del pan

Piotr Kropotkin

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Texto limpio
Extensión:
~78.500 palabras · 373 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAPiotr Kropotkin. (n.d.). La conquista del pan. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/peter-kropotkin/the-conquest-of-bread
  • MLAPiotr Kropotkin. "La conquista del pan." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/peter-kropotkin/the-conquest-of-bread.
  • ChicagoPiotr Kropotkin. La conquista del pan. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/peter-kropotkin/the-conquest-of-bread.

De qué trata

La conquista del pan (1892): cómo come la gente el día después de la revolución.

Contexto e historia

Kropotkin no discute principios: calcula. Cuánto pan hace falta, cuántas casas, cuántas horas de trabajo. La tesis es que el bienestar para todos ya es posible con la técnica existente, y que el problema es el reparto. Es el libro anarquista más práctico que se ha escrito.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Cómo empieza
One of the current objections to Communism, and Socialism altogether, is that the idea is so old, and yet it has never been realized. Schemes of ideal States haunted the thinkers of Ancient Greece; later on, the early Christians joined in communist groups; centuries later, large communist brotherhoods came into existence during the Reform movement. Then, the same ideals were revived during the great English and French Revolutions; and finally, quite lately, in 1848, a revolution, inspired to a great extent with Socialist ideals, took place in France. "And yet, you see," we are told, "how far away is still the realization of your schemes. Don't you think that there is some fundamental error in your understanding of human nature and its needs?" At first sight this objection seems very serious. However, the moment we consider human history more attentively, it loses its strength. We see, first, that hundreds of millions of men have succeeded in maintaining amongst themselves, in their village communities, for many hundreds of years, one of the main elements of Socialism--the common ownership of the chief instrument of production, the land, and the apportionment of the same according to the labour capacities of the different families; and we learn that if the communal possession of the land has been destroyed in Western Europe, it was not from within, but from without, by the governments which created a land monopoly in favour of the nobility and the middle classes. We learn, moreover, that the medieval cities succeeded in maintaining in their midst, for several centuries in succession, a certain socialized organization of production and trade; that these centuries were periods of a rapid intellectual, industrial, and artistic progress; while the decay of these communal institutions came mainly from the incapacity of men of combining the village with the city, the peasant with the citizen, so as jointly to oppose the growth of the military states, which…

Lee la obra completa →

← Volver a Piotr Kropotkin