Rosa Luxemburg — Una política anticlerical del socialismo (1903)
- Idioma:
- inglés
- Estado:
- Obra completa
- Autoría:
- Escrita por el autor
- Estado del texto:
- Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
- Extensión:
- ~3370 palabras · 16 pasajes
Cita esta obra
- APARosa Luxemburg. (n.d.). Rosa Luxemburg An anti-clerical policy of Socialism (1903) [Rosa Luxemburg — Una política anticlerical del socialismo (1903)]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/rosa-luxemburg/rosa-luxemburg-an-anti-clerical-policy-of-socialism-1903
- MLARosa Luxemburg. Rosa Luxemburg An anti-clerical policy of Socialism (1903) [Rosa Luxemburg — Una política anticlerical del socialismo (1903)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/rosa-luxemburg/rosa-luxemburg-an-anti-clerical-policy-of-socialism-1903.
- ChicagoRosa Luxemburg. Rosa Luxemburg An anti-clerical policy of Socialism (1903) [Rosa Luxemburg — Una política anticlerical del socialismo (1903)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/rosa-luxemburg/rosa-luxemburg-an-anti-clerical-policy-of-socialism-1903.
Referencia de la edición que reproduce SigPhi: SigPhi es su reproducción digital, no el editor. El año de la edición no consta en los metadatos (por eso «n.d.») y el traductor solo aparece cuando consta.
De qué trata
Una política anticlerical del socialismo (1903): qué debería hacer un partido obrero con la religión.
Contexto e historia
La posición de Luxemburg es más matizada de lo que promete el título: separar Iglesia y Estado, sí; combatir la fe de los obreros, no. Se lee bien junto a Iglesia y socialismo, que está en el catálogo en alemán. Traducción inglesa del Marxists Internet Archive. El original es alemán —o polaco, según la pieza—; para citar, el original. Esto es un artículo o un discurso de congreso, no un libro: su tamaño en el catálogo es el tamaño real de la pieza.
Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.
The analogy of the situation occupied by the army and by the Church towards the Republic has brought about a closer union between these two powers and has given a monarchical colouring to all the later political crises which have occurred in France. Every time these two organs of the Republic have been united in their revolt. And just as the contradiction between the army and the Republic can only be solved by the transformation of the standing army into a militia, the contradiction between the Catholic Church and the Republic can only disappear when the Church shall have ceased to be a public institution and shall have become a private institution, that is to say, when the Church shall have been separated from the State, when the clergy shall havebeen driven from the schools and from the army, and when the property of the religious orders shall have been confiscated. The Social-Democracy does not ask the partial confiscation of capitalist property by the middle-class State, but that is not because it is in principle an opponent of these confiscations. In cases where we ask for the socialisation of an industry, of that of the railways for example, we should not object if this measure took place simply by confiscation. If this be not one of our desiderata, if we do not ask only in certain cases that the State should take over an industry, it is because this working of an industry by the State would not alter the capitalist character of property and, indeed, in some cases it increases the power of a reactionary State. Even when this fear is not justified, as in Switzerland, such a demand addressed to a middle-class government is really utopian.