SigPhiSigPhi

Rosa Luxemburg — Motín y revolución (1906)

Rosa Luxemburg

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Texto limpio
Extensión:
~2950 palabras · 14 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APARosa Luxemburg. (n.d.). Rosa Luxemburg — Motín y revolución (1906). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/rosa-luxemburg/rosa-luxemburg-riot-and-revolution-1906
  • MLARosa Luxemburg. "Rosa Luxemburg — Motín y revolución (1906)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/rosa-luxemburg/rosa-luxemburg-riot-and-revolution-1906.
  • ChicagoRosa Luxemburg. Rosa Luxemburg — Motín y revolución (1906). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/rosa-luxemburg/rosa-luxemburg-riot-and-revolution-1906.

De qué trata

Motín y revolución (1906): la diferencia entre un estallido espontáneo y un proceso revolucionario.

Contexto e historia

Complementa La huelga de masas: Luxemburg no idealizaba la espontaneidad, quería entenderla. Traducción inglesa del Marxists Internet Archive. El original es alemán —o polaco, según la pieza—; para citar, el original. Esto es un artículo o un discurso de congreso, no un libro: su tamaño en el catálogo es el tamaño real de la pieza.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Cómo empieza
Copyleft: Luxemburg Internet Archive (marxists.org) 2003. Permission is granted to copy and/or distribute this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License . On the twelfth of last month Rosa Luxemburg was tried at the Criminal Court at Weimar for “inciting to the use of physical force” by the speech she contributed to the discussion on the General Strike at the annual Congress of the German Socialist Party held in 1905 at Jena. The court was densely crowded. Besides a great number of Socialists the audience included a good many “ladies of the highest Bourgeoisie”, the President of the Supreme Court, and, last but not least, a representative of the Ministry. Public Prosecutor’s Charge The incriminating speech having been read the Public Prosecutor submitted his case as follows: “After Bebel had spoken at the Party Congress in favour of the General Strike, other speakers, who took part in the discussion, expressed disapproval of such means, as the General Strike could lead to a physical force revolution, at which the workers may be defeated. Then followed the accused, who derided and sneered at these objections, more especially as they were living in the year of the ‘glorious Russian revolution’. She said: ‘we should be fools if that would be no lesson to us’, and she emphasised the fact that in Germany we had also arrived at that point where Evolution must give way to Revolution.…

Lee la obra completa →

← Volver a Rosa Luxemburg