SigPhiSigPhi

Las tres fuentes y las tres partes integrantes del marxismo

Vladimir Lenin

Idioma:
inglés
Estado:
Obra completa
Autoría:
Escrita por el autor
Estado del texto:
Sin ruido de escaneo detectado (medición automática sobre todo el texto, no revisada a mano)
Extensión:
~2320 palabras · 11 pasajes
Cita esta obra
  • APAVladimir Lenin. (n.d.). The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism [Las tres fuentes y las tres partes integrantes del marxismo]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/vladimir-lenin/the-three-sources-and-three-component-parts-of-marxism
  • MLAVladimir Lenin. The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism [Las tres fuentes y las tres partes integrantes del marxismo]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/es/works/vladimir-lenin/the-three-sources-and-three-component-parts-of-marxism.
  • ChicagoVladimir Lenin. The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism [Las tres fuentes y las tres partes integrantes del marxismo]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/es/works/vladimir-lenin/the-three-sources-and-three-component-parts-of-marxism.

Referencia de la edición reproducida. SigPhi es la reproducción digital. Se incluyen año, editorial y traductor cuando constan; «n.d.» indica que no consta el año.

De qué trata

Un artículo de 1913: el marxismo viene de la filosofía alemana, la economía inglesa y el socialismo francés.

Contexto e historia

Tres páginas que fijaron cómo se enseñaría el marxismo durante setenta años. La brevedad es del artículo: una pieza de divulgación, no un libro. El original está en RUSO. Esta es una traducción inglesa; para citar, el original.

Contexto editorial, no una fuente citable: a diferencia de los pasajes de la obra, estos datos no se pueden comprobar contra el corpus.

Extracto de la edición disponible
Where the bourgeois economists saw a relation between things (the exchange of one commodity for another) Marx revealed a relation between people. The exchange of commodities expresses the connection between individual producers through the market. Money signifies that the connection is becoming closer and closer, inseparably uniting the entire economic life of the individual producers into one whole. Capital signifies a further development of this connection: man’s labour-power becomes a commodity. The wage-worker sells his labour-power to the owner of land, factories and instruments of labour. The worker spends one part of the day covering the cost of maintaining himself and his family (wages), while the other part of the day he works without remuneration, creating for the capitalist surplus-value, the source of profit, the source of the wealth of the capitalist class. The doctrine of surplus-value is the corner-stone of Marx’s economic theory. Capital, created by the labour of the worker, crushes the worker, ruining small proprietors and creating an army of unemployed. In industry, the victory of large-scale production is immediately apparent, but the same phenomenon is also to be observed in agriculture, where the superiority of large-scale capitalist agriculture is enhanced, the use of machinery increases and the peasant economy, trapped by money-capital, declines and falls into ruin under the burden of its backward technique. The decline of small-scale production assumes different forms in agriculture, but the decline itself is an indisputable fact. By destroying small-scale production, capital leads to an increase in productivity of labour and to the creation of a monopoly position for the associations of big capitalists. Production itself becomes more and more social—hundreds of thousands and millions of workers become bound together in a regular economic organism—but the product of this collective labour is appropriated by a handful of capitalists.…

Lee esta edición →

← Volver a Vladimir Lenin