Historia animalium
- Lingua:
- inglese
- Stato:
- Opera completa
- Autorialità:
- Scritta dall'autore
- Stato del testo:
- Testo pulito
- Estensione:
- ~130.000 parole · 633 passi
Cita quest'opera
- APAAristotele. (n.d.). Historia animalium. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/aristotle/aristotle-s-history-of-animals
- MLAAristotele. "Historia animalium." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/it/works/aristotle/aristotle-s-history-of-animals.
- ChicagoAristotele. Historia animalium. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/aristotle/aristotle-s-history-of-animals.
Di che cosa tratta
La raccolta di Aristotele di ciò che si sapeva e di ciò che egli stesso osservò sugli animali: il più antico trattato di zoologia conservato.
Contesto e storia
«Storia» qui significa indagine, non racconto del passato. Il libro descrive parti, abitudini, riproduzione, alimentazione e comportamento di centinaia di specie, e il metodo è ciò che lo rende notevole: Aristotele disseziona, confronta e classifica, e dove non ha visto una cosa lo dice o nomina il suo informatore. Ci sono errori — molti, alcuni provenienti da pescatori e allevatori che lo informarono male — e ci sono osservazioni che non furono riconfermate se non nell'Ottocento, come la riproduzione del polpo o lo sviluppo giorno per giorno dell'embrione di pollo. Darwin scrisse che i suoi dèi della scienza erano scolaretti a paragone del vecchio Aristotele.
Contesto editoriale, non una fonte citabile: a differenza dei passi dell'opera, questi dati non si possono verificare sul corpus.
The following Translation of Aristotle's History of Animals has been made from the text of Schneider. In a work of considerable difficulty it is hardly possible entirely to avoid errors; but it is hoped that those which have escaped are neither numerous nor important. The notes of Schneider have been consulted throughout; and in places of difficulty the English translation by Taylor, the French of Camus, and the German of Strack, have been severally referred to. The work itself is the most ancient and celebrated contribution to science which has come down to us; and it is hardly possible, when we consider the means of observation which were accessible at the time, to imagine a work of more accurate observation. From the numerous quotations in which our author avails himself of the experience of his predecessors in the same field, as well as corrects their errors, there can be no doubt that Aristotle had the advantage of many works which have perished in the lapse of ages. In the Appendix to the present Translation will be found the Essay of Schneider on the sources whence Aristotle derived his knowledge of the animals he describes; and these sources, together with his own accurate observations, are probably sufficient to account for the correct knowledge of the history of animals displayed throughout the work. It is right, perhaps, to observe in this place, that Dr. Smith, in his Dictionary of Biography, speaks of the 'History of Animals' as partly the result of the royal liberality of Alexander; and doubtless Aristotle would gladly have introduced into his work any fresh materials which might have been made available to him either during his residence at the Macedonian court, or by the subsequent victories of Alexander in the East, if the information so obtained had reached Athens in sufficient time to be incorporated.…