SigPhiSigPhi

Sull'andatura degli animali

Aristotele

Lingua:
inglese
Stato:
Opera completa
Autorialità:
Scritta dall'autore
Stato del testo:
Testo pulito
Estensione:
~9470 parole · 45 passi
Cita quest'opera
  • APAAristotele. (n.d.). Sull'andatura degli animali. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/aristotle/on-the-progression-of-animals
  • MLAAristotele. "Sull'andatura degli animali." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/it/works/aristotle/on-the-progression-of-animals.
  • ChicagoAristotele. Sull'andatura degli animali. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/aristotle/on-the-progression-of-animals.

Di che cosa tratta

Perché gli animali hanno le membra che hanno, e perché sempre in numero pari.

Contesto e storia

Anatomia comparata prima che il nome esistesse: la forma delle membra vi è messa in rapporto con il modo di locomozione e con l'ambiente. Uno dei testi in cui l'Aristotele osservatore sul campo è più visibile.

Contesto editoriale, non una fonte citabile: a differenza dei passi dell'opera, questi dati non si possono verificare sul corpus.

Come comincia
We have now to consider the parts which are useful to animals for movement in place (locomotion); first, why each part is such as it is and to what end they possess them; and second, the differences between these parts both in one and the same creature, and again by comparison of the parts of creatures of different species with one another. First then let us lay down how many questions we have to consider. The first is what are the fewest points of motion necessary to animal progression, the second why sanguineous animals have four points and not more, but bloodless animals more than four, and generally why some animals are footless, others bipeds, others quadrupeds, others polypods, and why all have an even number of feet, if they have feet at all; why in fine the points on which progression depends are even in number. Next, why are man and bird bipeds, but fish footless; and why do man and bird, though both bipeds, have an opposite curvature of the legs. For man bends his legs convexly, a bird has his bent concavely; again, man bends his arms and legs in opposite directions, for he has his arms bent convexly, but his legs concavely. And a viviparous quadruped bends his limbs in opposite directions to a man's, and in opposite directions to one another; for he has his forelegs bent convexly, his hind legs concavely. Again, quadrupeds which are not viviparous but oviparous have a peculiar curvature of the limbs laterally away from the body. Again, why do quadrupeds move their legs criss-cross? We have to examine the reasons for all these facts, and others cognate to them; that the facts are such is clear from our Natural History, we have now to ask reasons for the facts. Part 2

Leggi l'opera intera →

← Torna a Aristotele