Le provinciali (ed. 2)
- Lingua:
- inglese
- Stato:
- Opera completa
- Autorialità:
- Scritta dall'autore
- Stato del testo:
- Nessun rumore di scansione rilevato (misura automatica su tutto il testo, non verificata a mano)
- Estensione:
- ~120.000 parole · 575 passi
Cita quest'opera
- APAPascal. (n.d.). Lettres Provinciales [Le provinciali (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/blaise-pascal/lettres-provinciales
- MLAPascal. Lettres Provinciales [Le provinciali (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/it/works/blaise-pascal/lettres-provinciales.
- ChicagoPascal. Lettres Provinciales [Le provinciali (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/blaise-pascal/lettres-provinciales.
Riferimento all’edizione riprodotta. SigPhi è la riproduzione digitale. Anno, editore e traduttore compaiono quando noti; «n.d.» indica un anno sconosciuto.
Di che cosa tratta
L'originale francese delle «Provinciali», del 1656-57: il testo da citare, e quello che creò la prosa francese moderna.
Contesto e storia
Nel catalogo c'è anche una traduzione inglese con introduzione storica; questa è l'opera quale Pascal la scrisse, e ciò conta perché in questo caso la lingua è l'argomento. Ciò che fece trionfare queste diciotto lettere anonime non fu solo quel che dicevano contro la casistica dei gesuiti, ma come lo dicevano: in francese corrente, in dialogo, con ironia e frasi brevi, in un tempo in cui una disputa teologica si scriveva in latino e per specialisti. Voltaire disse che era il primo libro di genio scritto in prosa francese. Furono bruciate per ordine del re e messe all'Indice nel 1660.
Contesto editoriale, non una fonte citabile: a differenza dei passi dell'opera, questi dati non si possono verificare sul corpus.
The question here was, if he could, without presumption, entertain a doubt that these propositions were in Jansenius, after the bishops had declared that they were. The matter having been brought before the Sorbonne, seventy-one doctors undertook his defence, maintaining that the only reply he could possibly give to the demands made upon him in so many publications, calling on him to say if he held that these propositions were in that book, was that he had not been able to find them, but that if they were in the book, he condemned them in the book. Some even went a step farther and protested that, after all the search they had made into the book, they had never stumbled upon these propositions, and that they had, on the contrary, found sentiments entirely at variance with them. They then earnestly begged that, if any doctor present had discovered them, he would have the goodness to point them out; adding that what was so easy could not reasonably be refused, as this would be the surest way to silence the whole of them, M. Arnauld included; but this proposal has been uniformly declined. So much for the one side. On the other side are eighty secular doctors and some forty mendicant friars, who have condemned M. Arnauld's proposition, without choosing to examine whether he has spoken truly or falsely- who, in fact, have declared that they have nothing to do with the veracity of his proposition, but simply with its temerity. Besides these, there were fifteen who were not in favor of the censure, and who are called Neutrals. Such was the issue of the question of fact, regarding which, I must say, I give myself very little concern. It does not affect my conscience in the least whether M.…