SigPhiSigPhi

The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life

Émile Durkheim

Lingua:
inglese
Traduzione:
J. W. Swain
Stato:
Opera completa
Autorialità:
Scritta dall'autore
Stato del testo:
Testo pulito
Estensione:
~270.000 parole · 1285 passi
Cita quest'opera
  • APAÉmile Durkheim. (n.d.). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/emile-durkheim/the-elementary-forms-of-the-religious-life
  • MLAÉmile Durkheim. "The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/it/works/emile-durkheim/the-elementary-forms-of-the-religious-life.
  • ChicagoÉmile Durkheim. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/emile-durkheim/the-elementary-forms-of-the-religious-life.

Di che cosa tratta

Il libro in cui Durkheim cerca la forma più semplice di religione per capirle tutte, e conclude che ciò che una società adora, senza saperlo, è se stessa.

Contesto e storia

Uscito nel 1912. Prende come caso elementare il totemismo dei popoli aborigeni australiani, e qui serve una precisazione onesta: Durkheim non vi andò mai. Lavora su etnografie altrui, e quel materiale è stato assai contestato in seguito, sia per la qualità sia per il presupposto che quelle società fossero «elementari». L'argomento sociologico — il sacro come forza collettiva, il rito come ciò che la tiene viva — ha retto assai meglio del materiale su cui fu costruito.

Contesto editoriale, non una fonte citabile: a differenza dei passi dell'opera, questi dati non si possono verificare sul corpus.

Come comincia
SUBJECT OF OUR STUDY: RELIGIOUS SOCIOLOGY AND THE THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE In this book we propose to study the most primitive and simple religion which is actually known, to make an analysis of it, and to attempt an explanation of it. A religious system may be said to be the most primitive which we can observe when it fulfils the two following conditions: in the first place, when it is found in a society whose organization is surpassed by no others in simplicity;[1] and secondly, when it is possible to explain it without making use of any element borrowed from a previous religion. We shall set ourselves to describe the organization of this system with all the exactness and fidelity that an ethnographer or an historian could give it. But our task will not be limited to that: sociology raises other problems than history or ethnography. It does not seek to know the passed forms of civilization with the sole end of knowing them and reconstructing them. But rather, like every positive science, it has as its object the explanation of some actual reality which is near to us, and which consequently is capable of affecting our ideas and our acts: this reality is man, and more precisely, the man of to-day, for there is nothing which we are more interested in knowing. Then we are not going to study a very archaic religion simply for the pleasure of telling its peculiarities and its singularities. If we have taken it as the subject of our research, it is because it has seemed to us better adapted than any other to lead to an understanding of the religious nature of man, that is to say, to show us an essential and permanent aspect of humanity.

Leggi l'opera intera →

← Torna a Émile Durkheim