SigPhiSigPhi

Sul sistema livellatore

Jeremy Bentham

Lingua:
inglese
Stato:
Opera completa
Autorialità:
Scritta dall'autore
Stato del testo:
Nessun rumore di scansione rilevato (misura automatica su tutto il testo, non verificata a mano)
Estensione:
~7160 parole · 34 passi
Cita quest'opera
  • APAJeremy Bentham. (n.d.). Of the Levelling System [Sul sistema livellatore]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/jeremy-bentham/of-the-levelling-system
  • MLAJeremy Bentham. Of the Levelling System [Sul sistema livellatore]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/it/works/jeremy-bentham/of-the-levelling-system.
  • ChicagoJeremy Bentham. Of the Levelling System [Sul sistema livellatore]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/jeremy-bentham/of-the-levelling-system.

Riferimento dell'edizione che SigPhi riproduce: SigPhi ne è la riproduzione digitale, non l'editore. L'anno dell'edizione non figura nei metadati (da qui «n.d.») e il traduttore compare solo quando è noto.

Di che cosa tratta

Sul sistema livellatore: sull'uguagliamento dei patrimoni.

Contesto e storia

Bentham si chiede se redistribuire la ricchezza accresca la felicità totale. La risposta ha due metà che di solito si citano separate: sì, perché lo stesso denaro vale di più per chi ne ha di meno; ma no, se distrugge la sicurezza della proprietà, che lui considera la condizione di tutto il resto.

Contesto editoriale, non una fonte citabile: a differenza dei passi dell'opera, questi dati non si possono verificare sul corpus.

Come comincia
many thousands of pounds to lend, so many thousands more than they have need to employ otherwise. Upon the equalisation scheme, all these monied men would be no more: nobody would have any thing he could spare for any length of time, much less for ever; no man would have any thing but from hand to mouth. As to the gainers — (I speak always of the immediate and momentary gainers, for ultimately, as we shall see, there would scarcely be a real gainer left in the nation) — as to the real gainers, if they were to be looked for any where, it would be in the class of the present day-labourers in husbandry. Their employment need not be changed; they would continue labourers in husbandry, with this comfortable difference, as it would be thought, of labouring upon, and for the benefit of their own property, instead of other people's. But even these would for the most part gain nothing but ruin by the change. Their fragments of farms having no buildings on them, would be useless to them till buildings could be erected. A man might farm profitably, and live comfortably a year or two hence, if he were then alive: but in the meantime he would not be able to farm or live at all. The immense multitude of new created farms, all of them without buildings, would require an immense and instant multiplication of the number of workmen concerned in building. But this number, instead of being multiplied, or so much as increased, would be as immediately and permanently reduced: for they too would have their portions, as well as the labourers in husbandry: if they laboured any longer, it would be upon their own property, not upon other people’s. If they laboured at all, what inducement would they have to labour upon other peoples property, or indeed for other people? What would they get by it? an

Leggi l'opera intera →

← Torna a Jeremy Bentham